Owners- Short arms & Long pockets..........or no pockets?

124

Comments

  • Sword65pf
    Sword65pf Posts: 3,186
    wolfgang said:
    Sword65pf said:
    I really do feel like NJ. Has been thrown under the bus.
    He'll survive. He has been earning good money for a decade. Does not seem like the type to waste money on breads and bitches. Worse case he will find a nice little job in the Cymru Premier. Holywell Town may need a new manager. Played 13, won 1. He would fit in well there and the name might appeal to him.

    Rules for choosing our next manager:
    1) No one from the Celtic fringe.
    2) No religious nuts.
    3) May not sign players from his former clubs.
    4) Must employ Ronnie and Golfie as advisors. 

    Am I there as a football adviser or a financial one...?? 
    No job too small!!😜
  • NabySarr
    NabySarr Posts: 6,920
    NabySarr said:
    NabySarr said:
    Sword65pf said:
    I suspect that our owners are reluctant to continue giving Jones and his advisers money for new signings, as his record so far, when it comes to Championship standard signings is abysmal. 
    Then sack him and give the money to someone they trust🤷🏻‍♂️, if not back him again.
    Is the obvious answer. I would hope the owners, assuming they still give a fig about us, are looking around for a successor to Jones This will not be easy. Our recent managerial roster is made up of chancers, past its and no hopers. No point in appointing another such in place of Jones who despite his shortcomings is still hanging on by his fingernails i m o. Also as we are up for sale, Jones is possibly safe until new owners decide on his and the clubs futures .. 
    Charlton for sale as Global Football Partners eye exit - Inside World Football .. Global Football Partners - shareholders with 5%+ each: Gabriel Brener and family Private investor and former majority shareholder of a Major League Soccer team Joshua Friedman and family Co-Founder, Co-Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer of Canyon Partners, LLC, a leading global alternative asset management firm Warren Rosenfeld and family.

    (Canyon Partners list the aquisition of 'distressed assets' as one of its main strategies)

    Anyway, back to the point at hand .. 
    Nathan Jones has done (and still is doing) his best for the club, but i m o his best is not good enough, he is just not a Championship class manager

    I wish Nathan Jones no ill will at all. Pro football is a tough and ruthless business, he knows that very well.
    Very few managers are really successesful, most try very hard, work 24/7 and still fail. Such is life 
    Can you point me to a time when Nathan Jones has under-achieved in a full season as a championship manager? Kept Luton up, got them to mid table and then got them to the play offs, and kept us up. So from 4 full seasons at this level he has overachieved every time 

    His only failure was at Stoke where plenty of good championship managers have also failed. 

    So based on his record. How is he not a championship class manager? And which championship class manager would you replace him with? 
    I m o Luton's success during their 'Jones era' was as much if not more down to Mick Harford's coaching and leadership as it was down to Nathan J .. I posted this today on the 'I am going to say it' etc etc thread .. an opinion I first posted way back 

    B t w .. Are you making a bid to be Nathan's P R person ? .. or already got the gig ?  ..  anymore questions ?
    It'd be good if you made a critique of my whole posts and not just the parts which suit your particular agenda to pick on
    So when Jones does well, its other people responsible. But when he does badly its his fault? Harford wasn't on the coaching staff (other than the times Jones left and he stepped in), he was responsible for recruitment. In fact, in one of those periods where Harford was caretaker they decided instead to hire Jones back and he led them to safety. He must have been an unbelievable coach to have that much impact with his coaching in a few caretaker manager spells. Harford was very good at his job, and recruited good players, so was Jones, who coached them to success. 

    I didn't disagree with the rest of your post other than the statement that Jones isn't a championship class manager, which I disagreed with based on his record of over-achievement in the championship
    Yes to that part.
    2016 ..  joined Luton .. 
    2019 .. 10 months at Stoke having jumped ship at Luton ? .. sacked. Return to Luton (and the safe arms of Mick Harford)
    2022 .. jumped from the Luton ship again BUT ... 4 months at Southampton (in the Prem) .. sacked 2023 having served  the shortest period as a 'full time' manager of the Saints.
    2024 .. Joined CAFC where Curtis Fleming now his assistant was acting as manager. Success like a few CAFC managers before him as a third tier manager, promotion through the playoffs. In the Championship, so far little more than manging to avoid relegation. 

    Not a great record. I'm sure Jones does his limited best though I doubt he is is a good man manager and he certainly lacks tactical nous. Just opinions of course, but results and performances speak for themselves. 

    You ask who would I like to replace Jones ?.  Most 'available' British managers have a history of recent failure otherwise they would still be employed. I say again, I can't see any 'upwardly mobile' British manager wanting to grasp the Charlton nettle.

    Picking a name. Perhaps Jack Wilshire, another Lutonian. He's not tainted with failure as yet. Of course no Champ experience. Still learning the job, so far so good. It'll never happen though.
    There must be a host of young ex pros with more coaching badges than you can throw a stick at who are gasping for an EFL job. Who ? I know not

    Or perhaps we should emulate (e.g.) Brighton, Southampton and Middlesbrough and look to appoint a young(ish) continental coach who's looking to make a career in the EFL. A clever German if possible

    Question I can't answer is who ?  I pass that puzzle to the CAFC talent spotters and scouts, if we have any left.




    Jack Wilshire is currently in 10th with probably the best squad in league 1, so far so bad. If we appointed him it would be a mental decision 

    I think giving a young coach their first job would be incredibly risky given our situation. 

    Yes there is probably a good manager out there abroad, but your last point is the big fear there. Do we really have the expertise in our ownership and staff to find a gem from abroad? I’d be very doubtful  
  • To me, more than the noise of owners and NJ, is our scouting. 

    Our recruitment has been poor for years.  The way to outperform in football is through recruitment first and foremost. Brighton and Brentford are the shining examples and their managers are just cogs in a bigger machine (look at the performance of Frank and Potter after leaving as an example).

    If I was an owner, that is where my money would have been spent.  Swansea having a great season after taking Brighton's recruitment data - could we have got hold of that instead?  They took Beadle and Ezenwata off us and wanted M'Bick, surely there was some kind of deal to be struck. 
    Lincoln another club with an amazing recruitment record.

    I look at our team and our best player is TC who came through the youth.  Despite spending the best part of £15M+ in the last 15 months or so, how much could we sell our first teamers for, when you exclude the kids and people like Lloyd Jones who joined well before any of the current managers/owners?  Not a lot I fear.

    That is simply poor recruitment.  Chapple has to take some responsibility for that, but what is the team around him and how does it compare with other Championship (and even League One) teams?
  • ElfsborgAddick
    ElfsborgAddick Posts: 31,523
    To me, more than the noise of owners and NJ, is our scouting. 

    Our recruitment has been poor for years.  The way to outperform in football is through recruitment first and foremost. Brighton and Brentford are the shining examples and their managers are just cogs in a bigger machine (look at the performance of Frank and Potter after leaving as an example).

    If I was an owner, that is where my money would have been spent.  Swansea having a great season after taking Brighton's recruitment data - could we have got hold of that instead?  They took Beadle and Ezenwata off us and wanted M'Bick, surely there was some kind of deal to be struck. 
    Lincoln another club with an amazing recruitment record.

    I look at our team and our best player is TC who came through the youth.  Despite spending the best part of £15M+ in the last 15 months or so, how much could we sell our first teamers for, when you exclude the kids and people like Lloyd Jones who joined well before any of the current managers/owners?  Not a lot I fear.

    That is simply poor recruitment.  Chapple has to take some responsibility for that, but what is the team around him and how does it compare with other Championship (and even League One) teams?
    In some ways this could be the root of our problems.
  • NabySarr
    NabySarr Posts: 6,920
    edited October 27
    To me, more than the noise of owners and NJ, is our scouting. 

    Our recruitment has been poor for years.  The way to outperform in football is through recruitment first and foremost. Brighton and Brentford are the shining examples and their managers are just cogs in a bigger machine (look at the performance of Frank and Potter after leaving as an example).

    If I was an owner, that is where my money would have been spent.  Swansea having a great season after taking Brighton's recruitment data - could we have got hold of that instead?  They took Beadle and Ezenwata off us and wanted M'Bick, surely there was some kind of deal to be struck. 
    Lincoln another club with an amazing recruitment record.

    I look at our team and our best player is TC who came through the youth.  Despite spending the best part of £15M+ in the last 15 months or so, how much could we sell our first teamers for, when you exclude the kids and people like Lloyd Jones who joined well before any of the current managers/owners?  Not a lot I fear.

    That is simply poor recruitment.  Chapple has to take some responsibility for that, but what is the team around him and how does it compare with other Championship (and even League One) teams?
    If you have a lower budget then it means recruitment becomes even more important. I’m not sure there is info out there about our full recruitment staff beyond Chapple and 1 other guy. I’d assume we have a full team of scouts and analysts but based on the results maybe not 
  • shine166
    shine166 Posts: 14,762
    Blame the scouting, but almost every signing is follow by NJ stating that hes been watching them for years. 
  • NabySarr
    NabySarr Posts: 6,920
    shine166 said:
    Blame the scouting, but almost every signing is follow by NJ stating that hes been watching them for years. 
    It’s the same quotes that every manager says about every signing. The players then say it’s a massive club and I had a great chat with the manager, can’t wait to play in front of the fans etc 
  • shirty5
    shirty5 Posts: 20,220
    shine166 said:
    Blame the scouting, but almost every signing is follow by NJ stating that hes been watching them for years. 
    It’s Rodwell’s comments on every signing that always brings a smile to my face.

    Every club does it to be fair. 
  • MarcusH26
    MarcusH26 Posts: 11,279
    Do think the recruitment is a major major issue. Is it just Chapple going all over Europe and Calvin Charlton covering Scotland specifically?

    How much does data play a role in our recruitment, are we tied to a company already for data so couldn't be eligible for the Jamestown/Tony Bloom package for this season? 

    I was expecting a few more signings from Europe this summer but I guess with the 4 GBE exemption slots that's always going to be tricky. I assume with Sichenje out for the season and Ouma AWOL we will actually have some flexibility on those for January. 

    If your budget gets slashed halfway through the window and you then have to pivot on who your targets are , it's even more important that you get them right and it just feels like we're trending towards more misses than hits which we really couldn't afford to have happen. 
  • NabySarr
    NabySarr Posts: 6,920
    MarcusH26 said:
    Do think the recruitment is a major major issue. Is it just Chapple going all over Europe and Calvin Charlton covering Scotland specifically?

    How much does data play a role in our recruitment, are we tied to a company already for data so couldn't be eligible for the Jamestown/Tony Bloom package for this season? 

    I was expecting a few more signings from Europe this summer but I guess with the 4 GBE exemption slots that's always going to be tricky. I assume with Sichenje out for the season and Ouma AWOL we will actually have some flexibility on those for January. 

    If your budget gets slashed halfway through the window and you then have to pivot on who your targets are , it's even more important that you get them right and it just feels like we're trending towards more misses than hits which we really couldn't afford to have happen. 
    I’d imagine the Jamestown stuff costs a fair bit so probably not something we could afford. And Jamestown would probably much rather work with a club on a higher budget 

    Would love there to be a bit more transparency around our recruitment process, who is involved and doing what. But I think that’s wishful thinking at the moment, kind of thing that would only be put out if things were going well 

  • Sponsored links:



  • sam3110
    sam3110 Posts: 25,060
    Well if Calvin Charlton was responsible for Edwards and then Koumetio, I'd be looking at him getting a greater responsibility, or focusing even harder on players north of the border
  • NabySarr
    NabySarr Posts: 6,920
    sam3110 said:
    Well if Calvin Charlton was responsible for Edwards and then Koumetio, I'd be looking at him getting a greater responsibility, or focusing even harder on players north of the border
    I don’t think he was here when we signed Edwards, neither was Chapple. The rumour at the time was that Nathan jones was watching Scottish football towards the end of the season before we signed Edwards 
  • valleynick66
    valleynick66 Posts: 5,826
    NabySarr said:
    sam3110 said:
    Well if Calvin Charlton was responsible for Edwards and then Koumetio, I'd be looking at him getting a greater responsibility, or focusing even harder on players north of the border
    I don’t think he was here when we signed Edwards, neither was Chapple. The rumour at the time was that Nathan jones was watching Scottish football towards the end of the season before we signed Edwards 
    He should watch more of our matches carefully and react accordingly !
  • Interesting that with the appointment of the new CEO there might just be hope of a budget re-set for January?
    Whether that will be with NJ in charge or not- time will tell?
    Can't see why the owners  would have made that appointment if they were not going to re-set their ambitions at least for this season to avoid the hit of the financial loss if we go down.......
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 24,160
    Interesting that with the appointment of the new CEO there might just be hope of a budget re-set for January?
    Whether that will be with NJ in charge or not- time will tell?
    Can't see why the owners  would have made that appointment if they were not going to re-set their ambitions at least for this season to avoid the hit of the financial loss if we go down.......
    I think this will have been in the works for a while to satisfy both the EFL and IFR, it just happens to have coincided with this run of results
  • Stig
    Stig Posts: 30,201
    edited October 28
    For me the biggest problem with our recruitment is that we make too many risky appointments, and too many of those risks blow up in our faces. Whether it's taking on players with persistent injuries or poorly disciplined players or ones whose careers have nosedived, you can bet your bottom dollar that when we sign them the injuries and indiscipline will continue as will their tailspinning careers. I'd like to see some steady Eddie recruiting.  
  • Crispywood
    Crispywood Posts: 3,048
    Stig said:
    For me the biggest problem with our recruitment is that we make too many risky appointments, and too many of those risks blow up in our faces. Whether it's taking on players with persistent injuries or poorly disciplined players or ones whose careers have nosedived, you can bet your bottom dollar that when we sign them the injuries and indiscipline will continue as will their tailspinning careers. I'd like to see some steady Eddie recruiting.  
    Unfortunately that costs way more money. When we’re a side that generates 4M below average revenue, haven’t sold players for big money and made previous bad investment it’s harder to justify 
  • NabySarr
    NabySarr Posts: 6,920
    Stig said:
    For me the biggest problem with our recruitment is that we make too many risky appointments, and too many of those risks blow up in our faces. Whether it's taking on players with persistent injuries or poorly disciplined players or ones whose careers have nosedived, you can bet your bottom dollar that when we sign them the injuries and indiscipline will continue as will their tailspinning careers. I'd like to see some steady Eddie recruiting.  
    That’s always going to be the case for teams with less money. The good players that have no issues go to clubs with more money. We are either left with league 1 quality players that are reliable, or championship quality players that aren’t reliable. 

    Shopping abroad is how you can maybe find quality that’s also reliable but probably more risk where you might get a Mesik or you might get an Ouma 
  • Stig
    Stig Posts: 30,201
    Yeah, I get all that Crispywood and NabySarr. Maybe it would feel better if just once in a while we took a punt on a risky player and things turned out well.
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 24,160
    Stig said:
    Yeah, I get all that Crispywood and NabySarr. Maybe it would feel better if just once in a while we took a punt on a risky player and things turned out well.
    Like Josh Edwards or Kayne Ramsay or Billy Koumetio?

  • Sponsored links:



  • Stig said:
    For me the biggest problem with our recruitment is that we make too many risky appointments, and too many of those risks blow up in our faces. Whether it's taking on players with persistent injuries or poorly disciplined players or ones whose careers have nosedived, you can bet your bottom dollar that when we sign them the injuries and indiscipline will continue as will their tailspinning careers. I'd like to see some steady Eddie recruiting.  
    I assume we do that precisely because we're trying to do it on the cheap.

    Jones wanted a central midfielder who was better and more positive in possession than those we had, and he ended up with Chalobah on a free after a long-ish trial.

    I don't think he would have chosen Chalobah if the other option was £4-5m on a better/younger/less injury prone option.

    We're shopping the yellow sticker section.
  • SouthLincsAddick
    SouthLincsAddick Posts: 872
    edited October 28
    To me, more than the noise of owners and NJ, is our scouting. 

    Our recruitment has been poor for years.  The way to outperform in football is through recruitment first and foremost. Brighton and Brentford are the shining examples and their managers are just cogs in a bigger machine (look at the performance of Frank and Potter after leaving as an example).

    If I was an owner, that is where my money would have been spent.  Swansea having a great season after taking Brighton's recruitment data - could we have got hold of that instead?  They took Beadle and Ezenwata off us and wanted M'Bick, surely there was some kind of deal to be struck. 
    Lincoln another club with an amazing recruitment record.

    I look at our team and our best player is TC who came through the youth.  Despite spending the best part of £15M+ in the last 15 months or so, how much could we sell our first teamers for, when you exclude the kids and people like Lloyd Jones who joined well before any of the current managers/owners?  Not a lot I fear.

    That is simply poor recruitment.  Chapple has to take some responsibility for that, but what is the team around him and how does it compare with other Championship (and even League One) teams?
    It’s taken the three B’s you mentioned well over 10 years to hone their scouting system and the key to their success has been radical stats based recruitment and much more importantly consistency. It’s only a few years ago that a mad Dane’s son was in charge using Football Manager 97 for reference. With us up for sale (sorry I mean reinvestment), I can’t see that consistency arriving any time soon.
  • It’s mad that the owners will lose £25m this season but we’re moaning it’s enough, the sad thing is though, it isn’t enough, not to be competitive. The new spending rules put us at even more of a disadvantage, no wonder the owners want out. This isn’t what Charlie boy promised them.
  • Carter
    Carter Posts: 14,809
    Stig said:
    For me the biggest problem with our recruitment is that we make too many risky appointments, and too many of those risks blow up in our faces. Whether it's taking on players with persistent injuries or poorly disciplined players or ones whose careers have nosedived, you can bet your bottom dollar that when we sign them the injuries and indiscipline will continue as will their tailspinning careers. I'd like to see some steady Eddie recruiting.  
    I assume we do that precisely because we're trying to do it on the cheap.

    Jones wanted a central midfielder who was better and more positive in possession than those we had, and he ended up with Chalobah on a free after a long-ish trial.

    I don't think he would have chosen Chalobah if the other option was £4-5m on a better/younger/less injury prone option.

    We're shopping the yellow sticker section.
    We always have done, from what we know and what players we are aware of who was a realistic signing for the number 8, box to box position? 

    I was adamant Brannagan from Oxford was the answer and still rate him and I'm surprised no other championship clubs have picked him up
  • MarcusH26
    MarcusH26 Posts: 11,279
    The Addicks have a small budget compared to most clubs in the Championship. Another source told The i Paper that the club’s owners, consortium Global Football Partners, were “basically selling to buy” in the summer window, while some investors “want to put in and others don’t” amid reports of the club being up for sale.

    Interesting tidbit in that article Tash has written for theI that's also been posted on the NJ thread. 


  • Crispywood
    Crispywood Posts: 3,048
    They’ve updated the staff list on the club website as of today, correct me if I’m wrong there used to be 7 owners with 5%+ stake in the club list is now down to 5. 

    Shows there are some people at the club willing to cash in 
  • MarcusH26
    MarcusH26 Posts: 11,279
    edited October 28
    They’ve updated the staff list on the club website as of today, correct me if I’m wrong there used to be 7 owners with 5%+ stake in the club list is now down to 5. 

    Shows there are some people at the club willing to cash in 
    Cracking spot but I can't figure who's missing? I thought ACA Football Partners were out of the scene a while ago? 

    * Oh it's Charlie of course. 
  • Crispywood
    Crispywood Posts: 3,048
    MarcusH26 said:
    They’ve updated the staff list on the club website as of today, correct me if I’m wrong there used to be 7 owners with 5%+ stake in the club list is now down to 5. 

    Shows there are some people at the club willing to cash in 
    Cracking spot but I can't figure who's missing? I thought ACA Football Partners were out of the scene a while ago? 

    * Oh it's Charlie of course. 
    I’m not sure if it was ACA football partners but wasn’t their some Asian company that worked in analytics that were part of it?  
  • Stig
    Stig Posts: 30,201
    fenaddick said:
    Stig said:
    Yeah, I get all that Crispywood and NabySarr. Maybe it would feel better if just once in a while we took a punt on a risky player and things turned out well.
    Like Josh Edwards or Kayne Ramsay or Billy Koumetio?
    Is that the same Josh Edwards as the one that was out injured for over a year and who still isn't up to speed? The same Kayne Ramsay who's only played four times this season, contributing to combined team performances that have earned a whopping two points? The same Billy Koumetio who, apart from one tackle, looked absolutely dreadful on Saturday?

    In all seriousness though, you have picked three of our best signings. However, the fact that they are three of our best speaks volumes about our recruitment.
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 24,160
    Stig said:
    fenaddick said:
    Stig said:
    Yeah, I get all that Crispywood and NabySarr. Maybe it would feel better if just once in a while we took a punt on a risky player and things turned out well.
    Like Josh Edwards or Kayne Ramsay or Billy Koumetio?
    Is that the same Josh Edwards as the one that was out injured for over a year and who still isn't up to speed? The same Kayne Ramsay who's only played four times this season, contributing to combined team performances that have earned a whopping two points? The same Billy Koumetio who, apart from one tackle, looked absolutely dreadful on Saturday?

    In all seriousness though, you have picked three of our best signings. However, the fact that they are three of our best speaks volumes about our recruitment.
    They’re our best signings because of the risk though. If they’d been 7 figure players (for example) the pressure would be higher and their performances would be considered standard not special