Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Winter-January 2026 Transfer Window Rumours ...

1…159160162164165…171

Comments

  • thenewbie
    thenewbie Posts: 11,142
    TheHerminator said:
    AberystwythAddick said:
    aso914 said:
    50% is still 12.5k a week 
    What an absolute waste of Money.

    crying out for other positions where this could have been needed 
    So we shouldn’t sign quality cover for Jones? 
    We absolutely should sign quality cover for Jones. We should not sign Coady. 
  • Bailey
    Bailey Posts: 3,613
    AndyG said:
    CaptainRobbo said:
    AberystwythAddick said:
    aso914 said:
    50% is still 12.5k a week 
    What an absolute waste of Money.

    crying out for other positions where this could have been needed 
    There is obviously a bit of moolah sloshing around.
    Maybe a good sign of things to come 🤞
    For £12.5k a week surely that buys a decent player ??? 
    If available. 
  • NabySarr
    NabySarr Posts: 4,992
    edited January 27
    ThomasOliver3 said:
    NabySarr said:
    ThomasOliver3 said:
    Callumcafc said:
    https://the72.co.uk/2026/01/27/oxford-united-bid-andrias-edmundsson/

    Oxford taking a gamble on an unproven left footed centre back

    This is what annoys me. Every other club in the Championship is creative with their transfers, looking for value, a rough diamond etc.

    All we every do is sign middle-old, British players ideally with a link to Luton. The requisite qualities required seem to be they players can't pass or keep the ball, they are just have to be stoppers or workhorses.

    My concern is that when NJ does inevitably go in the next 2-4 weeks, the new manager will be looking around asking where is the ability to pass, create or sprint. It's such a poorly constructed squad totally in the image of NJ.

    If he does somehow keeps us I'd still want him politely moved on in the summer as this anti-football isn't how we progress up the league.
    Seemed to work pretty well in progressing Luton up this league? 

    If Jones keeps us up he’s done a great job and deserves to go again next summer with hopefully us being able to be a bit more ambitious in our recruitment 
    IF he does then maybe that's fair.

    My own opinion is that even in the 4 years since his 6th place finish with Luton, the league has moved on. I don't see the long ball stuff working over time, and I don't enjoy watching it.

    Doesn't mean I'm not grateful to him, but the game doesn't stand still and right now we've been found out and so far don't have an answer.
    I’m sorry but that just isn’t true. 3 of the current championship top 6 are also in the bottom 8 for possession this season. Preston, Derby, QPR and Bristol City are also having good seasons and challenging for the play offs

    If anything the league is moving further away from technical and more towards valuing physical attributes, as teams have realised the physical jump to the premier league is huge and why teams keep coming straight back down 

    Fair enough if you don’t enjoy watching it or don’t rate Jones anymore, but the style definitely works at this level still 
  • Bailey
    Bailey Posts: 3,613
    thenewbie said:
    TheHerminator said:
    AberystwythAddick said:
    aso914 said:
    50% is still 12.5k a week 
    What an absolute waste of Money.

    crying out for other positions where this could have been needed 
    So we shouldn’t sign quality cover for Jones? 
    We absolutely should sign quality cover for Jones. We should not sign Coady. 
    OK, who should we sign then ?
  • CAFCsayer
    CAFCsayer Posts: 10,389
    Coady is a good signing if cover for jones, if he is being signed to start, in not so sure
  • AberystwythAddick
    AberystwythAddick Posts: 1,146
    CAFCsayer said:
    Coady is a good signing if cover for jones, if he is being signed to start, in not so sure
    For a reported 12.5k a week it’s a wank signing.

    absolutely fucking mental to consider paying that much for a back up player.  
  • alburyaddick
    alburyaddick Posts: 579
    ThomasOliver3 said:
    NabySarr said:
    ThomasOliver3 said:
    Callumcafc said:
    https://the72.co.uk/2026/01/27/oxford-united-bid-andrias-edmundsson/

    Oxford taking a gamble on an unproven left footed centre back

    This is what annoys me. Every other club in the Championship is creative with their transfers, looking for value, a rough diamond etc.

    All we every do is sign middle-old, British players ideally with a link to Luton. The requisite qualities required seem to be they players can't pass or keep the ball, they are just have to be stoppers or workhorses.

    My concern is that when NJ does inevitably go in the next 2-4 weeks, the new manager will be looking around asking where is the ability to pass, create or sprint. It's such a poorly constructed squad totally in the image of NJ.

    If he does somehow keeps us I'd still want him politely moved on in the summer as this anti-football isn't how we progress up the league.
    Seemed to work pretty well in progressing Luton up this league? 

    If Jones keeps us up he’s done a great job and deserves to go again next summer with hopefully us being able to be a bit more ambitious in our recruitment 
    IF he does then maybe that's fair.

    My own opinion is that even in the 4 years since his 6th place finish with Luton, the league has moved on. I don't see the long ball stuff working over time, and I don't enjoy watching it.

    Doesn't mean I'm not grateful to him, but the game doesn't stand still and right now we've been found out and so far don't have an answer.
    I think this is interesting, I’m certainly not an expert on football tactics but there has actually been a shift away from tippy tappy possession football in the Premier League back to set pieces, corners , long throws and the long ball. 
    I think our problem is that ( and we have lost the Josh Edwards long throw) we just aren’t as good at Nathan’s preferred tactical approach as we need to be ! 
    I agree its not great to watch but none of us would care if it was working but it isn’t 
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 34,849
    FirenzeAddick said:
    golfaddick said:
    Jdredsox said:
    Not commented much on here as I didn't have any rumours, but you have to laugh.

    Last week everyone was complaining about Chambers not having enough experience and that was what we needed in the relegation battle. This week we're complaining about signing an experienced defender, who hasn't even signed yet.
    Love the spin you're trying to put on it but let me align you with the facts.

    No-one was complaining about Chambet's lack of EXPERIENCE.......they were complaining about his lack of FITNESS. In case you were unaware the reason why he only played 45 mins on Sat was because he had only played 2 games of football this season due to a back injury he sustained last April and therefore he game time has to be "managed". I doubt we'll see him play 90 mins for a good few weeks yet so unless we sign another left footed defender we might be seeing TC at LWB for the next few games.

    And the complaints around Coady are that he is slow & not what he need when you are in a relegation battle. Experience us one thing.....being past it is another.

    If only football & recruitment was as simple as you pretend it to be, you are a master at finding problems but don't ever seem to put forward a reasoned solution? The simple solution to all problems in football, is buy better players. The trouble is every other club has worked that out too, and if you have less money than them its hard to complete.

    If we could bring in a match fit left back to suit our budget and fit our style of play, I can 100% categorically guarantee that Jones and the board would have done so.

    Leicester fans context for Coady is in a Championship promotion season and a relegation from the Premier League, very different to ours and the standard/speed of the PL is worlds apart.
    Did you miss the bit from the Wrexham fans saying he was slow when he played at the start of this season in the Championship ?  It took Parky 5 games before he dropped him and supposedly he's not played since.

    And are you telling me that there are no fit left backs in the whole of Europe ?  Yes, they might cost a bit of money but thats what it takes to stay in this League. What was it Oscar Wilde said about knowing the price of something & the value of nothing. It will cost more than a couple of million if we get relegated & are stuck in League One for another 5 years.
  • Valley11
    Valley11 Posts: 12,133
    Why is Coady ‘good’ if back up? The point being made by Wrexham fans is his legs have gone. So doesn’t matter if he’s being used for 20 mins or 90. 
  • Scoham
    Scoham Posts: 38,184
    AberystwythAddick said:
    CAFCsayer said:
    Coady is a good signing if cover for jones, if he is being signed to start, in not so sure
    For a reported 12.5k a week it’s a wank signing.

    absolutely fucking mental to consider paying that much for a back up player.  
    Maybe Jones has an injury and Coady will be first choice?

  • Sponsored links:



  • RonnieMoore
    RonnieMoore Posts: 4,798
    AberystwythAddick said:
    aso914 said:
    50% is still 12.5k a week 
    What an absolute waste of Money.

    crying out for other positions where this could have been needed 

    Chris_from_Sidcup said:
    ElliotCAFC said:
    I don't mind him signing to be a leader and emergency cover should several CB's get injured at the same time, but if he's here to improve our defense, I'm suddenly very worried about our ability to bring in good players this week. 
    It’s an excellent signing .. he can play anywhere in a three which I believe he will along with Jones and Ramsey ( not sure he a starter on form ) .. can see Bell playing LWB and Clarke RWB one thing noticeable will be the height in our back 5 .. 
  • Rufus is a dogs name
    Rufus is a dogs name Posts: 1,549
    edited January 27
    There's a big difference in the value of paying 12.5k per week for a player as a back up centre half vs what that 12.5k could potentially get us in someone who is a starter and properly sort out that left hand side (or CM for that matter).
  • RonnieMoore
    RonnieMoore Posts: 4,798
    AberystwythAddick said:
    CAFCsayer said:
    Coady is a good signing if cover for jones, if he is being signed to start, in not so sure
    For a reported 12.5k a week it’s a wank signing.

    absolutely fucking mental to consider paying that much for a back up player.  
    He not back up he starting to good to be back up .. don’t worry about that 
  • golfaddick
    golfaddick Posts: 34,849
    TheHerminator said:
    AberystwythAddick said:
    aso914 said:
    50% is still 12.5k a week 
    What an absolute waste of Money.

    crying out for other positions where this could have been needed 
    So we shouldn’t sign quality cover for Jones? 
    We should certainly sign quality cover for Jones. Whether that is Coady is another matter.
  • llama_child_21cws
    llama_child_21cws Posts: 98
    Rufus is a dogs name said:
    There's a big difference in the value of paying 12.5k per week for a player as a back up centre half vs what that 12.5k could potentially get us in someone who as a starter and properly sort out that left hand side (or CM for that matter).
    L. Jones might not be able to play 90 minutes every week so we need someone who can play there
  • NabySarr
    NabySarr Posts: 4,992
    AberystwythAddick said:
    CAFCsayer said:
    Coady is a good signing if cover for jones, if he is being signed to start, in not so sure
    For a reported 12.5k a week it’s a wank signing.

    absolutely fucking mental to consider paying that much for a back up player.  
    Where has 12.5k a week come from? Absolutely no chance we will be paying him that 

    Wrexham are desperate to get rid because they have too many players signed on in their squad. They’ll be taking a huge hit on his wages 
  • AberystwythAddick
    AberystwythAddick Posts: 1,146
    NabySarr said:
    AberystwythAddick said:
    CAFCsayer said:
    Coady is a good signing if cover for jones, if he is being signed to start, in not so sure
    For a reported 12.5k a week it’s a wank signing.

    absolutely fucking mental to consider paying that much for a back up player.  
    Where has 12.5k a week come from? Absolutely no chance we will be paying him that 

    Wrexham are desperate to get rid because they have too many players signed on in their squad. They’ll be taking a huge hit on his wages 
    Sky sports reporting he’s on about 25k a week and they are looking at a 50% split 
  • CAFCsayer
    CAFCsayer Posts: 10,389
    edited January 27
    AberystwythAddick said:
    CAFCsayer said:
    Coady is a good signing if cover for jones, if he is being signed to start, in not so sure
    For a reported 12.5k a week it’s a wank signing.

    absolutely fucking mental to consider paying that much for a back up player.  
    12.5k a week is peanuts in the championship and without a transfer fee... To put it into context, I'm pretty sure Chuks wasn't miles off of that. An experienced head like coady and a bit of leadership as a rotation option is a good signing in my book
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,879
    Another Coady rumour screenshot. 

    Off Facebook though so they probably saw it elsewhere and copied. 

  • Sponsored links:



  • NabySarr
    NabySarr Posts: 4,992
    AberystwythAddick said:
    NabySarr said:
    AberystwythAddick said:
    CAFCsayer said:
    Coady is a good signing if cover for jones, if he is being signed to start, in not so sure
    For a reported 12.5k a week it’s a wank signing.

    absolutely fucking mental to consider paying that much for a back up player.  
    Where has 12.5k a week come from? Absolutely no chance we will be paying him that 

    Wrexham are desperate to get rid because they have too many players signed on in their squad. They’ll be taking a huge hit on his wages 
    Sky sports reporting he’s on about 25k a week and they are looking at a 50% split 
    Can’t see sky sports reporting on the move anywhere? Or anyone commenting on the split being 50%? Where have you seen the 50% split? 
  • Bolderhumphreyreid
    Bolderhumphreyreid Posts: 2,581
    edited January 27
    Luton fans were saying that Bell was over the hill and that Burke would be a Premier League player if it weren't for the injuries.

    Bell is outstanding when fit and I've seen nothing of Burke to suggest he's better than average.

    I actually think Coady is a solid purchase.
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,879
    Michaelmon said:
    golfaddick said:
    Jdredsox said:
    Not commented much on here as I didn't have any rumours, but you have to laugh.

    Last week everyone was complaining about Chambers not having enough experience and that was what we needed in the relegation battle. This week we're complaining about signing an experienced defender, who hasn't even signed yet.
    Love the spin you're trying to put on it but let me align you with the facts.

    No-one was complaining about Chambet's lack of EXPERIENCE.......they were complaining about his lack of FITNESS. In case you were unaware the reason why he only played 45 mins on Sat was because he had only played 2 games of football this season due to a back injury he sustained last April and therefore he game time has to be "managed". I doubt we'll see him play 90 mins for a good few weeks yet so unless we sign another left footed defender we might be seeing TC at LWB for the next few games.

    And the complaints around Coady are that he is slow & not what he need when you are in a relegation battle. Experience us one thing.....being past it is another.
    Oh come off it. There were literally loads of comments about Chamber's lack of EXPERIENCE above a league one level
    I second this. It was a circa 50/50 split on concerns around fitness and experience.
  • BenHaimandBikey
    BenHaimandBikey Posts: 572
    Player/Pundit coming in on 12.5k a week. A bargain!
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,879
    Chris_from_Sidcup said:
    TheHerminator said:
    golfaddick said:
    NabySarr said:
    Coady is only going to be played in the middle of the back 3. It’s where he’s played for anyone else and with his lack of pace you don’t want him on the sides so this isn’t a Gillesphey replacement 

    If this is a signing that is just Coady sitting on the bench to cover Jones, might come on to see a game out as an extra defensive body, but will be a great presence off the pitch then I think that’s fine 

    Coady was picked for England squads for years purely because of how good he is off the field. On the field he showed at Wrexham that he’s not good enough anymore at this level 

    If the plan is to sign Coady and he’s going to play regularly then that is a terrible decision 
    Don't need pace......first 5 yards is in your head. Look at Jorge Costa...😉
    Jesus Christ, I've found myself agreeing with more than a few of the things you've said recently. 

    I feel weird
    It's fashionable to have a go at Golfie on here simply because it's Golfie, but quite often he actually does talk sense and if some of his posts were said by others they wouldn't get even half the general derision.
    It's not always about what he says, but how he says it. It always comes across as either misery or pointing out the obvious.

    If you spin it with a tone that is less negative and more an opportunity, or at least not a doom and gloom tone it comes across far less irritatingly. 
  • RodneyCharltonTrotta
    RodneyCharltonTrotta Posts: 14,926
    CaptainRobbo said:
    Just waiting for that Di Canio type signing for a bit of excitement.
    Wouldn't surprise me if we did actually sign Di Canio.
  • fenaddick
    fenaddick Posts: 14,842
    NabySarr said:
    AberystwythAddick said:
    NabySarr said:
    AberystwythAddick said:
    CAFCsayer said:
    Coady is a good signing if cover for jones, if he is being signed to start, in not so sure
    For a reported 12.5k a week it’s a wank signing.

    absolutely fucking mental to consider paying that much for a back up player.  
    Where has 12.5k a week come from? Absolutely no chance we will be paying him that 

    Wrexham are desperate to get rid because they have too many players signed on in their squad. They’ll be taking a huge hit on his wages 
    Sky sports reporting he’s on about 25k a week and they are looking at a 50% split 
    Can’t see sky sports reporting on the move anywhere? Or anyone commenting on the split being 50%? Where have you seen the 50% split? 
    It’s on their transfer live blog

    https://www.skysports.com/football/live-blog/31771/12476234/transfer-centre-live-football-transfer-news-updates-and-rumours?postid=10933627#liveblog-body
  • KiwiValley
    KiwiValley Posts: 3,449
    Dazzler21 said:
    Another Coady rumour screenshot. 

    Off Facebook though so they probably saw it elsewhere and copied. 

    Coady indicating the distance he can run before he's blowing out his arse and possibly injured
  • stop_shouting
    stop_shouting Posts: 3,710
    The more I read the posts about coady and the salary he is going to command, the more I’m convinced that jones is gonna be out for a bit 😕
  • Richard J
    Richard J Posts: 8,075
    edited January 27
    I always look for links.

    Did Coady play with Lloyd Jones at Liverpool at U21 level? If so they might be mates and understand each others games.

Categories

“Marketplace”