Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
jonny deep
Comments
-
Both are actors, so actually getting the truth out of it is nigh on impossible. Depp's charm has worked wonders for him overall in the public eye, but FWIW I think Heard has been slightly worse than him in the stories told and it's only exasperated the situation and helped fuel the support for Depp.
They are both absolute pieces of shit1 -
Friend of mine came to stay with us last week and talk non stop about it.
Up until then I had no clue what was going on. Mainly because, well, it’s not particularly important is it? With everything else going on in the world 🤷♀️Same as the Vardy Rooney nonsense.
Why are we so obsessed with celebrities 😳12 -
KBslittlesis said:Friend of mine came to stay with us last week and talk non stop about it.
Up until then I had no clue what was going on. Mainly because, well, it’s not particularly important is it? With everything else going on in the world 🤷♀️Same as the Vardy Rooney nonsense.
Why are we so obsessed with celebrities 😳
I've never been remotely interested in the lives of celebrities and it is easy to avoid if you are a retired old fogey like me.
I was drawn in by the misspelling in the thread title, which I found amusing.
Surely it should be Johnny and Amanda Shallow3 -
sam3110 said:Both are actors, so actually getting the truth out of it is nigh on impossible. Depp's charm has worked wonders for him overall in the public eye, but FWIW I think Heard has been slightly worse than him in the stories told and it's only exasperated the situation and helped fuel the support for Depp.
They are both absolute pieces of shit4 -
McBobbin said:Surprised that so many people have such strong views on this, taken one side, and getting into inflamed arguments. I know it's the way of the world online but it's strange. Nobody knows these two people, nobody knows the truth of the matter. I understand it's "news" as they are famous, but some of the vitriol is just odd.
I agree but the hatred for someone who happens to wear a different club's colours is also difficult to explain to someone who doesn't follow sport.
Equally, looking in, some might question why so many people get into inflamed arguments about the merits of whether a footballer at a third tier football club, such as Chris Solly for example, should be held accountable for not fulfilling his contract. But they do and there is as much more in the public domain as to what went on in the Heard/Deppe relationship than was said between player and manager - especially as the individuals in question are being questioned under oath in order to establish that truth.
It is whatever interests you. One man's meat and all that.2 -
new version of Punch n Judy .. Amber n Jonny0
-
The legal question that's being addressed is whether or not Amber Heard's OpEd is true and whether it's defamatory. The fact that they've both come out of this in a much worse state than they entered is mere fluff. The legal case rests on whether what she wrote about him was true and, if not, did it damage him, materially.
So far, legally, it seems both parties are on for a big loss.0 -
Chizz said:The legal question that's being addressed is whether or not Amber Heard's OpEd is true and whether it's defamatory. The fact that they've both come out of this in a much worse state than they entered is mere fluff. The legal case rests on whether what she wrote about him was true and, if not, did it damage him, materially.
So far, legally, it seems both parties are on for a big loss.4 -
It says a lot that there are so few people willing to defend her in the media this time round. Even victim charities and activists seem to be unusually muted. The reaction is strikingly different to the other high profile abuse cases.0
-
I'm sure that with the exact same set of facts, if it wasn't teenage hearthrob Johnny Depp, but John C O'Reilly, talented character actor though he is, the reaction would be different.0
- Sponsored links:
-
ElliotCAFC said:Chizz said:The legal question that's being addressed is whether or not Amber Heard's OpEd is true and whether it's defamatory. The fact that they've both come out of this in a much worse state than they entered is mere fluff. The legal case rests on whether what she wrote about him was true and, if not, did it damage him, materially.
So far, legally, it seems both parties are on for a big loss.0 -
thenewbie said:ElliotCAFC said:Chizz said:The legal question that's being addressed is whether or not Amber Heard's OpEd is true and whether it's defamatory. The fact that they've both come out of this in a much worse state than they entered is mere fluff. The legal case rests on whether what she wrote about him was true and, if not, did it damage him, materially.
So far, legally, it seems both parties are on for a big loss.0 -
thenewbie said:ElliotCAFC said:Chizz said:The legal question that's being addressed is whether or not Amber Heard's OpEd is true and whether it's defamatory. The fact that they've both come out of this in a much worse state than they entered is mere fluff. The legal case rests on whether what she wrote about him was true and, if not, did it damage him, materially.
So far, legally, it seems both parties are on for a big loss.0 -
It's also a civil case so nothing "legal" about it, technically1
-
Whos Deep?0
-
Chizz said:thenewbie said:ElliotCAFC said:Chizz said:The legal question that's being addressed is whether or not Amber Heard's OpEd is true and whether it's defamatory. The fact that they've both come out of this in a much worse state than they entered is mere fluff. The legal case rests on whether what she wrote about him was true and, if not, did it damage him, materially.
So far, legally, it seems both parties are on for a big loss.4 -
Not read this thread and don't intend to. If we care about this we get sucked into a World of nonsense. Why can't they just not talk to each other like others do?
0 -
MuttleyCAFC said:Not read this thread and don't intend to. If we care about this we get sucked into a World of nonsense. Why can't they just not talk to each other like others do?
Her lies have cost him millions. I'm pleased it's in court, I just hope the truth whatever that may be is found in favour of.1 -
MuttleyCAFC said:Not read this thread and don't intend to. If we care about this we get sucked into a World of nonsense. Why can't they just not talk to each other like others do?
2 -
Please never ever change the title of this thread.4
- Sponsored links:
-
DamoNorthStand said:Please never ever change the title of this thread.2
-
Apparently Depp hasn't look at Heard once in the whole trial, and this stems back to when he told her a few years ago "you'll never see my eyes again"
Pretty hardcore to not only deliver that line, but stick to his word about it so far2 -
For those of you that may be interested, by all accounts the jury have reached a verdict and it will be announced at 8PM UK time.3
-
I'm so uninterested in this story. Media just feeding on itself.
I do think that the way the media has influenced the trial is poor though. There's widespread love for Depp and hatred for Heard. I much prefer our untelevised court system which doesn't try to make a soap opera out of people's suffering.3 -
2.7 million people watching on one stream on youtube right now, multiple others over 250 thousand, it's a new world. Soap operas WISH they could get these kind of viewing figures.2
-
Wow... Didnt expect Johnny Depp to win0
-
cafcnick1992 said:I'm so uninterested in this story. Media just feeding on itself.
I do think that the way the media has influenced the trial is poor though. There's widespread love for Depp and hatred for Heard. I much prefer our untelevised court system which doesn't try to make a soap opera out of people's suffering.
Maybe she really is a bad egg, but the whole pantomime just doesn’t sit right with me.
Edit: So, Depp won. Now hopefully the jury made it’s decision purely on the evidence, but like @cafcnick1992 said, I can’t help but think the coverage influenced it. Safe to say Amber Heard’s career as she knows it is over. Maybe that’s karma? I’m not so sure.0 -
ForeverAddickted said:Wow... Didnt expect Johnny Depp to win
Thought it was more about getting public opinion back on his side than actually winning.
To actually win the case is quite something.2 -
At least Heard won't have to worry now about giving the $7m divorce settlement that she promised to give to charity - but never did.2
-
lordromford said:cafcnick1992 said:I'm so uninterested in this story. Media just feeding on itself.
I do think that the way the media has influenced the trial is poor though. There's widespread love for Depp and hatred for Heard. I much prefer our untelevised court system which doesn't try to make a soap opera out of people's suffering.
Maybe she really is a bad egg, but the whole pantomime just doesn’t sit right with me.
Suspect he's paid a fair bit to online content companies etc to push it in the right places as well as to lawyers.2