Just watching Spurs v Blackburn and it seems Blackburn have taken the decision, for whatever reason, not to have a poppy on their shirt.
Except for the goalkeeper Paul Robinson.
I thought it might just be hard to see in their red shirts, but I've looked carefully and they definitely don't have one.
Anyone know why this is? And why does Robinson have one?
0
Comments
Why? What exactly does that achieve? It's a fine cause and one I whole heartedly support, but it's possible to go OTT. There has been a minutes silence at every Premier League and Football League match this weekend and there was a poppy wreath laid on the centre circle before our match. That's enough surely, all in addition to the 2 minutes silence that all those in support of the event will have held privately on Thursday.
Really?
I was looking carefully everytime they did a close up on one of them on Football First and didn't see any.
Yer the whole Blackburn team definately had one.
Well, that answers my question then eh?
*gets coat*
The poppy shirts I have seen seem to be embedded in the fabric (rather than being a sewn-on badge), suggesting a new shirt has been produced, rather than as a stick-on badge.
With funds as tight as they are the producing 16 new jerseys might have been a bit expensive for some teams.
Just a thought......
I don't really think having a poppy on the shirt can be classed as OTT. As for what does it achieve, well exactly the same as what you wearing a poppy on your coat or jumper - it shows support for the cause.
Of course.
It does show support, but there was also a minutes silence before kick-off a poppy wreath laid on the centre spot - it's not exactly like event was completely ignored is it. having a poppy on the shirt as well isn't really necessary on top of that.
You realise the kits are signed n auctioned after the game and all the money goes to the poppy appeal, right?
How much would you pay for those that Charlton didn't wear yesterday ?
How much would you pay for a Celtic one while we're at it ?
Saw that the refs had them on their shirts as well.
The ubiquity of expecting poppy wearing is making it into something way more than a remembrance, IMHO making it into something quite controlling. It reminds me of the 'unless it's forbidden it's compulsory' mantra of the ants in The Once and Future King.
Because of what it represents.
Interestingly
India's army grew from 200,000 in 1939 to 2.5 million in 1945, with Muslims making up about a third of the numbers at any one time. Most Muslim recruits came from what is now Pakistan.
In all, 87,000 Indian army soldiers were killed in the war, according to the Commonwealth War Graves Commission.
Hmmm. Not sure that his can't be said of any charity. Why shouldn't shirts have the symbol of sense or RNLI or Oxfam then - they all represent charities at least as worthy, as do many, many more.
Didn't Aston Villa wear a charity shirt (?Acorns) for a season or more a while back?
Not too sure you're not trying to get a response but the wearing of a poppy over other visable types of charity support, the ribbons, wristbands, badges, etc, is more than just an message to everyone you donate to a certain charity. It's an outward way of showing that you appreciate and recognise the sacrifices made by many, many, others and continue to be made.