Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Royal Family
Comments
-
The girl on the other side has her fingers crossed too, albeit her other hand is partially covering them.Karim_myBagheri said:I reckon it had something to do with the one on the other side with his fingers crossed...
What a thoroughly odd series of events. No wonder social media is doing it's thing and coming up with all sorts of guff. It's all just a bit strange.0 -
I am definitely not going to get involved with, or exacerbate any wild speculation or rumour-mongering.
Definitely not.
Because there's nothing worthwhile that can come of "noticing" something on the picture and then commenting on it. Nothing at all.
So I won't make any speculation or wild assumptions based on what can be seen in the photo. I mean, they issue a photo pretty much every year to coincide with family events, such as birthdays, Mother's Day, Christmas and so forth.
Usually lovely, smiling pictures that show the Prince and Princess of Wales in the way in which they want to be seen. Happy, loving, caring, settled, bright, interesting, contented, cheerful, untroubled people getting on with their lives and nurturing their family as best they can.
Always the same. Every time. Different compositions each time. But the same, general ambience, aura and mood. A family projecting family values.
So, I wonder why she's taken her wedding ring off this time..?1 -
They've locked her up like Britney haven't they. #FreeKate1
-
Honestly think they’ve pissed around with the settings on a new Pixel and it’s done weird things with Best shot2
-
Perhaps she is suffering from swollen fingers and it is uncomfortable. She may be on drugs that cause them to swell.Chizz said:I am definitely not going to get involved with, or exacerbate any wild speculation or rumour-mongering.
Definitely not.
Because there's nothing worthwhile that can come of "noticing" something on the picture and then commenting on it. Nothing at all.
So I won't make any speculation or wild assumptions based on what can be seen in the photo. I mean, they issue a photo pretty much every year to coincide with family events, such as birthdays, Mother's Day, Christmas and so forth.
Usually lovely, smiling pictures that show the Prince and Princess of Wales in the way in which they want to be seen. Happy, loving, caring, settled, bright, interesting, contented, cheerful, untroubled people getting on with their lives and nurturing their family as best they can.
Always the same. Every time. Different compositions each time. But the same, general ambience, aura and mood. A family projecting family values.
So, I wonder why she's taken her wedding ring off this time..?4 -
Is it just possible that’s she’s just found out that she’s married into a family of lizards ?8
-
Because she would definitely send a signal about the state of her marriage in this way.Chizz said:I am definitely not going to get involved with, or exacerbate any wild speculation or rumour-mongering.
Definitely not.
Because there's nothing worthwhile that can come of "noticing" something on the picture and then commenting on it. Nothing at all.
So I won't make any speculation or wild assumptions based on what can be seen in the photo. I mean, they issue a photo pretty much every year to coincide with family events, such as birthdays, Mother's Day, Christmas and so forth.
Usually lovely, smiling pictures that show the Prince and Princess of Wales in the way in which they want to be seen. Happy, loving, caring, settled, bright, interesting, contented, cheerful, untroubled people getting on with their lives and nurturing their family as best they can.
Always the same. Every time. Different compositions each time. But the same, general ambience, aura and mood. A family projecting family values.
So, I wonder why she's taken her wedding ring off this time..?
You do write some absolute guff sometimes.0 -
Not easy for someone in her position to get a message out there at all. I think the missing ring is a very valid observation.SporadicAddick said:
Because she would definitely send a signal about the state of her marriage in this way.Chizz said:I am definitely not going to get involved with, or exacerbate any wild speculation or rumour-mongering.
Definitely not.
Because there's nothing worthwhile that can come of "noticing" something on the picture and then commenting on it. Nothing at all.
So I won't make any speculation or wild assumptions based on what can be seen in the photo. I mean, they issue a photo pretty much every year to coincide with family events, such as birthdays, Mother's Day, Christmas and so forth.
Usually lovely, smiling pictures that show the Prince and Princess of Wales in the way in which they want to be seen. Happy, loving, caring, settled, bright, interesting, contented, cheerful, untroubled people getting on with their lives and nurturing their family as best they can.
Always the same. Every time. Different compositions each time. But the same, general ambience, aura and mood. A family projecting family values.
So, I wonder why she's taken her wedding ring off this time..?
You do write some absolute guff sometimes.4 -
.0
-
Incredible how anybody could give that much of a shit about this.23
- Sponsored links:
-
.0
-
Thank you for your considered comments. If I mentioned "sending a signal", then I apologise.SporadicAddick said:
Because she would definitely send a signal about the state of her marriage in this way.Chizz said:I am definitely not going to get involved with, or exacerbate any wild speculation or rumour-mongering.
Definitely not.
Because there's nothing worthwhile that can come of "noticing" something on the picture and then commenting on it. Nothing at all.
So I won't make any speculation or wild assumptions based on what can be seen in the photo. I mean, they issue a photo pretty much every year to coincide with family events, such as birthdays, Mother's Day, Christmas and so forth.
Usually lovely, smiling pictures that show the Prince and Princess of Wales in the way in which they want to be seen. Happy, loving, caring, settled, bright, interesting, contented, cheerful, untroubled people getting on with their lives and nurturing their family as best they can.
Always the same. Every time. Different compositions each time. But the same, general ambience, aura and mood. A family projecting family values.
So, I wonder why she's taken her wedding ring off this time..?
You do write some absolute guff sometimes.
If, instead, I asked a question as to why she'd removed her wedding ring, then it would be because I'm interested in the opinions of thoughtful, intelligent contributors. And perhaps also yours.9 -
Clearly she's a cyberman. They're well known to be allergic to gold.3
-
They've run out of money and she has to do her own washing up?ShootersHillGuru said:
Not easy for someone in her position to get a message out there at all. I think the missing ring is a very valid observation.SporadicAddick said:
Because she would definitely send a signal about the state of her marriage in this way.Chizz said:I am definitely not going to get involved with, or exacerbate any wild speculation or rumour-mongering.
Definitely not.
Because there's nothing worthwhile that can come of "noticing" something on the picture and then commenting on it. Nothing at all.
So I won't make any speculation or wild assumptions based on what can be seen in the photo. I mean, they issue a photo pretty much every year to coincide with family events, such as birthdays, Mother's Day, Christmas and so forth.
Usually lovely, smiling pictures that show the Prince and Princess of Wales in the way in which they want to be seen. Happy, loving, caring, settled, bright, interesting, contented, cheerful, untroubled people getting on with their lives and nurturing their family as best they can.
Always the same. Every time. Different compositions each time. But the same, general ambience, aura and mood. A family projecting family values.
So, I wonder why she's taken her wedding ring off this time..?
You do write some absolute guff sometimes.7 -
Always knew that Andrew was telling the truth. He never did meet that girl. Kate’s been messing around with photoshop the whole time.6
-
Yet ANOTHER reason for Anti-Royalist Republicans... Shit Photoshop skills, Grrrrr!0
-
Following on from Welling's result at Yeovil Saturday.
https://x.com/wellingunited/status/1767153682263543899?s=20
1 -
Bit of a harsh description of Kate that mate.soapy_jones said:Yet ANOTHER reason for Anti-Royalist Republicans... Shit Photoshop skills, Grrrrr!0 -
0 -
Because we are subjects and most of us pay to keep the Royal family going, the Royal firm want the masses to wave their flags on Royal occasions and give them privacy when they are proving they are very ordinary people, who are only Royal because of being in the right place at the right time?
Harry wanted privacy yet also wanted the publicity when it suited and the money.
When King Charlie was Prince of Wales he gave William and Harry millions from the Duchy of Cornwall money making institution.
Does it matter what's wrong with Kate ?
Well about as much as that other soap opera, East Enders when Dirty Den and Angie were having a row. (Last time I watch it so can't give any current characters !)
Both William and Kate are under pressure because of Harry and Megan doing a runner. They now have a small squad to chose from since Queen Elizabeth death, Harry and Megan going stateside and Andrew being a dirty old man. 5 down including Kate and with King Charles having cancer of some descriptive they are short of Royals who are capable to step up.
Anne and William are the only fit royals and the firm may have to get a Euro Royal loan.
My Danish mate Claus tells me Brigette the Duchess of Gloucester was born into the Danish Royal family and is having a fitness test as I type this.
Carry on up the Windsors.
Was Sid James in that one 🤔
5 - Sponsored links:
-
Have you seen Kate?soapboxsam said:Because we are subjects and most of us pay to keep the Royal family going, the Royal firm want the masses to wave their flags on Royal occasions and give them privacy when they are proving they are very ordinary people, who are only Royal because of being in the right place at the right time?
Harry wanted privacy yet also wanted the publicity when it suited and the money.
When King Charlie was Prince of Wales he gave William and Harry millions from the Duchy of Cornwall money making institution.
Does it matter what's wrong with Kate ?
Well about as much as that other soap opera, East Enders when Dirty Den and Angie were having a row. (Last time I watch it so can't give any current characters !)
Both William and Kate are under pressure because of Harry and Megan doing a runner. They now have a small squad to chose from since Queen Elizabeth death, Harry and Megan going stateside and Andrew being a dirty old man. 5 down including Kate and with King Charles having cancer of some descriptive they are short of Royals who are capable to step up.
Anne and William are the only fit royals and the firm may have to get a Euro Royal loan.
My Danish mate Claus tells me Brigette the Duchess of Gloucester was born into the Danish Royal family and is having a fitness test as I type this.
Carry on up the Windsors.
Was Sid James in that one 🤔
I mean, not recently, I presume, but you know what I mean.1 -
I have seen Kate but then I got distracted by her sister's...North Lower Neil said:
Have you seen Kate?soapboxsam said:Because we are subjects and most of us pay to keep the Royal family going, the Royal firm want the masses to wave their flags on Royal occasions and give them privacy when they are proving they are very ordinary people, who are only Royal because of being in the right place at the right time?
Harry wanted privacy yet also wanted the publicity when it suited and the money.
When King Charlie was Prince of Wales he gave William and Harry millions from the Duchy of Cornwall money making institution.
Does it matter what's wrong with Kate ?
Well about as much as that other soap opera, East Enders when Dirty Den and Angie were having a row. (Last time I watch it so can't give any current characters !)
Both William and Kate are under pressure because of Harry and Megan doing a runner. They now have a small squad to chose from since Queen Elizabeth death, Harry and Megan going stateside and Andrew being a dirty old man. 5 down including Kate and with King Charles having cancer of some descriptive they are short of Royals who are capable to step up.
Anne and William are the only fit royals and the firm may have to get a Euro Royal loan.
My Danish mate Claus tells me Brigette the Duchess of Gloucester was born into the Danish Royal family and is having a fitness test as I type this.
Carry on up the Windsors.
Was Sid James in that one 🤔
I mean, not recently, I presume, but you know what I mean.1 -
North Lower Neil said:
Have you seen Kate?soapboxsam said:Because we are subjects and most of us pay to keep the Royal family going, the Royal firm want the masses to wave their flags on Royal occasions and give them privacy when they are proving they are very ordinary people, who are only Royal because of being in the right place at the right time?
Harry wanted privacy yet also wanted the publicity when it suited and the money.
When King Charlie was Prince of Wales he gave William and Harry millions from the Duchy of Cornwall money making institution.
Does it matter what's wrong with Kate ?
Well about as much as that other soap opera, East Enders when Dirty Den and Angie were having a row. (Last time I watch it so can't give any current characters !)
Both William and Kate are under pressure because of Harry and Megan doing a runner. They now have a small squad to chose from since Queen Elizabeth death, Harry and Megan going stateside and Andrew being a dirty old man. 5 down including Kate and with King Charles having cancer of some descriptive they are short of Royals who are capable to step up.
Anne and William are the only fit royals and the firm may have to get a Euro Royal loan.
My Danish mate Claus tells me Brigette the Duchess of Gloucester was born into the Danish Royal family and is having a fitness test as I type this.
Carry on up the Windsors.
Was Sid James in that one 🤔
I mean, not recently, I presume, but you know what I mean.
I should've said healthy not fit !
You have just highlighted that I said William and Anne are fit 🤦🏻♂️
TBF both Kate and Zara are fit but we digress...
0 -
apologies, I meant patronising guff.Chizz said:
Thank you for your considered comments. If I mentioned "sending a signal", then I apologise.SporadicAddick said:
Because she would definitely send a signal about the state of her marriage in this way.Chizz said:I am definitely not going to get involved with, or exacerbate any wild speculation or rumour-mongering.
Definitely not.
Because there's nothing worthwhile that can come of "noticing" something on the picture and then commenting on it. Nothing at all.
So I won't make any speculation or wild assumptions based on what can be seen in the photo. I mean, they issue a photo pretty much every year to coincide with family events, such as birthdays, Mother's Day, Christmas and so forth.
Usually lovely, smiling pictures that show the Prince and Princess of Wales in the way in which they want to be seen. Happy, loving, caring, settled, bright, interesting, contented, cheerful, untroubled people getting on with their lives and nurturing their family as best they can.
Always the same. Every time. Different compositions each time. But the same, general ambience, aura and mood. A family projecting family values.
So, I wonder why she's taken her wedding ring off this time..?
You do write some absolute guff sometimes.
If, instead, I asked a question as to why she'd removed her wedding ring, then it would be because I'm interested in the opinions of thoughtful, intelligent contributors. And perhaps also yours.0 -
Quite funny first time roundFriend Or Defoe said:2 -
"Patronising"? Crikey, what a big word. Do you know it means talking down to people. Well done, you.SporadicAddick said:
apologies, I meant patronising guff.Chizz said:
Thank you for your considered comments. If I mentioned "sending a signal", then I apologise.SporadicAddick said:
Because she would definitely send a signal about the state of her marriage in this way.Chizz said:I am definitely not going to get involved with, or exacerbate any wild speculation or rumour-mongering.
Definitely not.
Because there's nothing worthwhile that can come of "noticing" something on the picture and then commenting on it. Nothing at all.
So I won't make any speculation or wild assumptions based on what can be seen in the photo. I mean, they issue a photo pretty much every year to coincide with family events, such as birthdays, Mother's Day, Christmas and so forth.
Usually lovely, smiling pictures that show the Prince and Princess of Wales in the way in which they want to be seen. Happy, loving, caring, settled, bright, interesting, contented, cheerful, untroubled people getting on with their lives and nurturing their family as best they can.
Always the same. Every time. Different compositions each time. But the same, general ambience, aura and mood. A family projecting family values.
So, I wonder why she's taken her wedding ring off this time..?
You do write some absolute guff sometimes.
If, instead, I asked a question as to why she'd removed her wedding ring, then it would be because I'm interested in the opinions of thoughtful, intelligent contributors. And perhaps also yours.0 -
What about faux intellectual patronising guff?Chizz said:
"Patronising"? Crikey, what a big word. Do you know it means talking down to people. Well done, you.SporadicAddick said:
apologies, I meant patronising guff.Chizz said:
Thank you for your considered comments. If I mentioned "sending a signal", then I apologise.SporadicAddick said:
Because she would definitely send a signal about the state of her marriage in this way.Chizz said:I am definitely not going to get involved with, or exacerbate any wild speculation or rumour-mongering.
Definitely not.
Because there's nothing worthwhile that can come of "noticing" something on the picture and then commenting on it. Nothing at all.
So I won't make any speculation or wild assumptions based on what can be seen in the photo. I mean, they issue a photo pretty much every year to coincide with family events, such as birthdays, Mother's Day, Christmas and so forth.
Usually lovely, smiling pictures that show the Prince and Princess of Wales in the way in which they want to be seen. Happy, loving, caring, settled, bright, interesting, contented, cheerful, untroubled people getting on with their lives and nurturing their family as best they can.
Always the same. Every time. Different compositions each time. But the same, general ambience, aura and mood. A family projecting family values.
So, I wonder why she's taken her wedding ring off this time..?
You do write some absolute guff sometimes.
If, instead, I asked a question as to why she'd removed her wedding ring, then it would be because I'm interested in the opinions of thoughtful, intelligent contributors. And perhaps also yours.
You've been carrying it off well for years.1 -
I thought chizz was taking the piss, is why I laughed at his original comment.
1 -
I thought it was clever and amusing. Vintage Chizz.Chizz said:I am definitely not going to get involved with, or exacerbate any wild speculation or rumour-mongering.
Definitely not.
Because there's nothing worthwhile that can come of "noticing" something on the picture and then commenting on it. Nothing at all.
So I won't make any speculation or wild assumptions based on what can be seen in the photo. I mean, they issue a photo pretty much every year to coincide with family events, such as birthdays, Mother's Day, Christmas and so forth.
Usually lovely, smiling pictures that show the Prince and Princess of Wales in the way in which they want to be seen. Happy, loving, caring, settled, bright, interesting, contented, cheerful, untroubled people getting on with their lives and nurturing their family as best they can.
Always the same. Every time. Different compositions each time. But the same, general ambience, aura and mood. A family projecting family values.
So, I wonder why she's taken her wedding ring off this time..?1 -
Oh come on! I hope she is better with Paint3d...RedArmySE7 said:
Bit of a harsh description of Kate that mate.soapy_jones said:Yet ANOTHER reason for Anti-Royalist Republicans... Shit Photoshop skills, Grrrrr!0
