The man that killed 77 people and injured 242 in the bomb attack in Oslo and the killing spree on the small island, Utoeya (many under 18 years old).
He told the court he would "do it again." He admits to the bombings and attacks but pleads not guilty to terror and mass murder.
The question is, do you think he is sane or insane? There seems to be something seriously messed up in his head.
0
Comments
I read somewhere that he is claiming self defence and that he shed teers of joy when the video of the bombing was shown in the court.
Also read that the trial was halted for a time as one of the judges had spoken out saying that he should be facing the death penalty.
He has twisted political views, but that doesn't make him mad.
Maybe not in the way that insanity is judged by 'professionals' and their list of boxes that need to be ticked, but he is definitely mental.
His antics and comments thus far during the trial merely illustrate this and the longer he's allowed to spout such crap the more bizarre he's likely to become.
Lovely country Norway and I just love the people.....they are obviously trying to demonstrate to the world how 'fair minded' they are but honestly in this instance just declare him insane and throw the key away guys. No one is going to hold you up to ridicule or being considered heartless if you did so.
Before he done all this, He knew that he would either be killed or spend the rest of his life behind bars but sacrificed that for what he believes to be the 'good of his country's future'. IMHO You can't fault him for his views, Everyone has personal opinions but shooting kids etc is just sick imo. Not mental but sick and theres no doubt he will spend the rest of his life in prison. I just hope he suffers.
He wanted to make an hour long speech to the court about the West and Immigration. Don't know if he was allowed or not though?
No differnace from this guy to any other arse wipe terrorist--------he shouldnt be given a voice. Jury yes-----trial yes----no media-----no coverage
To find him not guilty by virtue of insanity would be a travesty of justice imho.
He's entitled to an opinion - but when that opinion is expressed in the murder of 77 mostly young kids (and all of them were unarmed) then it crosses a line. Cowardice is the least of his sins unless attacking unarmed young adults is ok?
Only read/quote half my posts if you want so it looks like it was meant in a different way.
I know what I meant and stand by the view if that you can't fault someone for having views aslong as they're not acted on in a waylike he did. Thats just sick and Can be faulted!
you can't stop people having views no matter how sick or twisted they are to you or me as they are their views.
but i think you can fault him for his views, they are warped and prehistoric, and then what he did afterwards....i think we all agree on that
also for someone to believe that killing all them kids was "for the good of his country" is insane. how has his country benefitted? no reasonable person would have believed that any good would have come from committing those acts. just because you can plan something doesn't mean you are sane