Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Charlton have an updated/new O/S

«1345

Comments

  • AFKABartram
    AFKABartram Posts: 57,833
    rarely look at the OS, what's new about it ?
  • O-Randy-Hunt
    O-Randy-Hunt Posts: 10,668
    Won't believe it until its on the O/S
  • ValleyGary
    ValleyGary Posts: 37,987
    looks really cheap if im honest.
  • Folev the red
    Folev the red Posts: 2,087
    It looks the same for me
  • Stebo
    Stebo Posts: 790
    it's obviously something they're working on, because it keeps changing and then going back to the old one.

    I'm hoping it's still a work in progress, because at the moment it looks like something knocked up in 5 minutes using frontpage.
  • Friend Or Defoe
    Friend Or Defoe Posts: 18,104
    Looks better than the old one but you still can't buy tickets.
  • Steve Kavanagh and Varney gone from Directors
  • sam3110
    sam3110 Posts: 21,293
    They need to change the font it's far too spindly and pixelated
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,016
    Looks totally different. I reserve judgement.
    It does say they will be giving up to date match reporting for CAFC.
  • Swisdom
    Swisdom Posts: 14,977
    I hardly ever look at it to be honest - just to make sure our sponsorship of Rhoys Wiggins is still showing - and our website is on there

    www.whitecode.co.uk if anyone needs a Building Services Design service :-)

  • Sponsored links:



  • razil
    razil Posts: 15,041
    yikes too much white..
  • wickford
    wickford Posts: 863
    Everyday I love it less and less....
  • rikofold
    rikofold Posts: 4,051
    sam3110 said:

    They need to change the font it's far too spindly and pixelated

    Agree. It's fine on IE strangely, probably some IE-specific font smoothing thing, but looks dreadful on Chrome. Better than the last effort I think, though.
  • JT
    JT Posts: 12,348
    1st time i've been on it for a very long time
  • DamoNorthStand
    DamoNorthStand Posts: 10,943
    God, that looks so cheap and nasty. And agree on the font, it looks like something from a school project.
  • Greenie
    Greenie Posts: 9,172
    edited July 2012
    Whys is it still red though?
  • eaststandmike
    eaststandmike Posts: 14,956
    Mine keeps reverting to the old one so I cannot see any difference, not that I go there much these days
  • suzisausage
    suzisausage Posts: 11,502
    I very rarely look at the site, but having just gone on - I like it - it looks less 'busy' than it used to with the red background and small headings.
  • Plaaayer
    Plaaayer Posts: 9,001
    Wrong shade of red.
  • Mine looks exactly the same...

  • Sponsored links:



  • Ross
    Ross Posts: 4,412
    Can someone with the new site do a screen shot please?
  • Greenie
    Greenie Posts: 9,172
    Got it now, much better.
  • Stebo
    Stebo Posts: 790
    image
  • Ross
    Ross Posts: 4,412
    That looks horrible. Very basic.

    Hopefully just a work in progress.
  • JT
    JT Posts: 12,348
    Looks like a site from a club who have run out of cash..
  • Saga Lout
    Saga Lout Posts: 6,845
    Front end is similar to the revamped BBC site - I don't know why you are all saying it looks cheap and nasty?
  • Plaaayer
    Plaaayer Posts: 9,001
    Revamped so they no longer show the Directors.
  • Ross
    Ross Posts: 4,412
    Font types and sizes, lack of lines/boxes between stories etc.

    Like I said, hopefully just a work in progress.

    We are still under the FLi contract, and apparently there were a few layouts to choose from, so I wonder if any other teams have had theirs change yet?
  • Looks same to me?
  • NathanPrior
    NathanPrior Posts: 3,577
    Ross said:


    We are still under the FLi contract, and apparently there were a few layouts to choose from, so I wonder if any other teams have had theirs change yet?

    Of what I've seen Oxford have changed too