Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Max Clifford
Chris_from_Sidcup
Posts: 36,012
"The jury in the trial of Max Clifford had to be sent out for laughing this afternoon as an alleged victim gave graphic evidence in relation to the man’s penis size"
Poor Max. Hung like a button mushroom.
Poor Max. Hung like a button mushroom.
1
Comments
-
Who'd have thought such a massive prick would have such a small cock?12
-
he got it out to disprove the evidence .. but it wouldn't stand up in court ... boom boom ... ((:>)7
-
Poor old Max, he has brought such joy to so many but not in the trouser department apparently...0
-
it was actually because the woman said he was well endowed, and that she "only had a small mouth"0
-
"Jurors in the indecent assault trial of publicist Max Clifford have been told they can return a majority verdict.
Judge Anthony Leonard told the 10-person jury he would accept a verdict on which nine of them agreed.
Mr Clifford, 71, from Surrey, denies 11 counts of indecent assault against seven women and girls, aged 14 to 19, between 1966 and 1984.
The jury has been sent home after a fifth day of deliberations and will reconvene at 10:00 BST on Thursday.
The six men and four women were called back into Southwark Crown Court after lunch on Wednesday, where they informed the judge they had been unable to reach unanimous decisions on all of the counts.
The judge told them: "The time has now come in law where I am able to say that I can accept a verdict which is not the verdict of you all, but it must be a verdict on which at least nine of you are agreed." "0 -
Going down.1
-
Guilty on 8 counts of indecent assault and not guilty of 20
-
Always comes across as an arrogant prick.3
-
That's because he ismistrollingin said:Always comes across as an arrogant prick.
1 -
Couldn't happen to a nicer bloke....filth.0
- Sponsored links:
-
Well done to the CPS and the police. They have had a lot of uncalled for criticism over Yewtree imo but hopefully this will make other victims feel more confident in coming forward in the future
4 -
mistrollingin said:
Always comes across as an acorn prick.
0 -
Women who want a man with money and a sizeable package, need a job and a tighter *****.1
-
There's no such thing as bad publicity though, eh Max ?6
-
.0
-
Wonder if some of the people Clifford has tried so vehemently to "spin" the truth about them are sitting quite so satisifed tonight by all he has done for them?0
-
karma`s a bitch aint it Max ?3
-
Why has he not been remanded before sentencing? Surely there's no doubt he'll be sent to prison.0
-
My guess: 4 years out in 20
-
Literally just said that to my missus when it came on the news. Eight counts of indecent assault including one under the age of 16 - why on earth wouldn't he be on remand ?DaveMehmet said:Why has he not been remanded before sentencing? Surely there's no doubt he'll be sent to prison.
0 - Sponsored links:
-
There's a fair old stack in Weybridge going empty for a while if anyone is short of digs!0
-
Custody on remand is generally used only if the convicted person is a danger to the public or likely to abscond.se9addick said:
Literally just said that to my missus when it came on the news. Eight counts of indecent assault including one under the age of 16 - why on earth wouldn't he be on remand ?DaveMehmet said:Why has he not been remanded before sentencing? Surely there's no doubt he'll be sent to prison.
0 -
I'd say he's a danger to 15 year old girls.0
-
he might be if he had a weapon, but it sounds like the young girls will be perfectly safe.LoOkOuT said:I'd say he's a danger to 15 year old girls.
2 -
Mind how you go in the showers next week Max.0
-
I see - cheers. I thought you were generally held on remand if you were likely to be sent down.Viewfinder said:
Custody on remand is generally used only if the convicted person is a danger to the public or likely to abscond.se9addick said:
Literally just said that to my missus when it came on the news. Eight counts of indecent assault including one under the age of 16 - why on earth wouldn't he be on remand ?DaveMehmet said:Why has he not been remanded before sentencing? Surely there's no doubt he'll be sent to prison.
-1 -
I may be wrong, but I believe these offences were committed 30/40 odd years ago.LoOkOuT said:I'd say he's a danger to 15 year old girls.
If so, he probably isn't still a danger .0 -
Hope he gets all he deserves slowly and painfully,it couldn't happen to a nicer bloke!0
-
And the majority of the victims came forward after he was named by police apparently, so he may not have been convicted if the defendant anonymity that people keep banging on about had been in place.0
-
Just hope he gets a proper prison and not the holiday camp open prison's that rich people seem to end up in.0
