Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Max Clifford
Comments
-
Covered End said:
I may be wrong, but I believe these offences were committed 30/40 odd years ago.LoOkOuT said:I'd say he's a danger to 15 year old girls.
If so, he probably isn't still a danger .
Is that how it works?0 -
He won't be inside long, unfortunately0
-
Well, if his last offence was in 1982, I should suspect with lower testosterone and also suffering from cancer, he's pretty unlikely to offend in the next 4 days.JT said:Covered End said:
I may be wrong, but I believe these offences were committed 30/40 odd years ago.LoOkOuT said:I'd say he's a danger to 15 year old girls.
If so, he probably isn't still a danger .
Is that how it works?0 -
I'm glad your not in no.10!Covered End said:
Well, if his last offence was in 1982, I should suspect with lower testosterone and also suffering from cancer, he's pretty unlikely to offend in the next 4 days.JT said:Covered End said:
I may be wrong, but I believe these offences were committed 30/40 odd years ago.LoOkOuT said:I'd say he's a danger to 15 year old girls.
If so, he probably isn't still a danger .
Is that how it works?0 -
Wouldn't be shocked if he were to "take the easy way out" between now and sentencing.............0
-
Hardly the point!Covered End said:
Well, if his last offence was in 1982, I should suspect with lower testosterone and also suffering from cancer, he's pretty unlikely to offend in the next 4 days.JT said:Covered End said:
I may be wrong, but I believe these offences were committed 30/40 odd years ago.LoOkOuT said:I'd say he's a danger to 15 year old girls.
If so, he probably isn't still a danger .
Is that how it works?0 -
Well tbh, I'm not expecting a famous 72ish year old bloke, suffering from prostate cancer to be in a position in the next 4 days to reoffend, when he hasn't since he was 30 years old. He's scum, but let's be realistic.
I shouldn't think he's got any business appointments with women booked in the next 4 days.1 -
You never know. He may decide to have a final fling0
-
Letter to Viz about Max Clifford, seven years ago (not for those shocked by bad language):
https://www.facebook.com/VizComic?fref=photo4 -
Sponsored links:
-
Don't think he can fling it, just move it from side to side slightly.Rob said:You never know. He may decide to have a final fling
0 -
0
-
Yes he is 72, and probably unlikely to abscond, but for a crime as serious as sexual assault, he should be remanded in custody to await his sentence. That might be for his own protection, too.
Hope he gets put away for a long time - he has a very few mitigating circumstances to see a reduction in sentence and a lot of aggravating ones. He will need solitary, methinks.0 -
I know. Looks like a man who never took it seriously and thought he'd get away with it.Bedsaddick said:0 -
Rosina Cottage QC - the prosecutor - according to the web site for her chambers, she has a reputation for excellence in this area (sexual offences) gained from dealing with some of the most high profile and sensitive cases over many years.
I wonder if she gets the work because of her name, chose to specialise in the area because of her name or it's just a coincidence?
1 -
3
-
8 years and will serve at least 42
-
Not long enough tbh!Elthamaddick said:8 years and will serve at least 4
1 -
Arrogant to the last. What a complete and utter tosser.4
-
Sponsored links:
-
Good riddance dirty pervert hope he gets abused in prison and made to feel what his victims went through0
-
Blimey. I expected him to get a lot less .
Never mind , perhaps his mate James Bond can help him escape .0 -
-
Just read a transcript of the judge's summing-up, which goes into disturbing detail about all the offences that were taken into account. Not for the faint-hearted, and I won't repeat any of it on here. But believe me, he's absolute scum of the most scummy order. A real nasty, NASTY piece of work.0
-
Dirty old nonce case.
Just looking at him makes my skin crawl. I hope he gets proper battered inside or does us all a favour and croaks it.2 -
Most disgusting thing was dragging his family through it. Got to feel sorry for them.
Hope he gets b@ggered senseless inside.1 -
Arrogant arsehole
Feel sorry for his wife and family, he will get roggered inside0 -
Consecutive sentences rather than concurrent is pretty unusual. Rather gives a clue as to what the judge thought of him.
However I'd suggest it does open the door for an appeal.0 -
I read that the tarif for the offences for which he was convicted is now 10 years but at the time they were actually committed (70's and 80's) it was 2 years - hence the individual sentences for these 8 offences range from 6 - 24 months. It is, as I understand it, entirely up to the trial judge to determine whether sentences for multiple convictions run consecuatively or concurrently.cafcfan said:Consecutive sentences rather than concurrent is pretty unusual. Rather gives a clue as to what the judge thought of him.
However I'd suggest it does open the door for an appeal.
If he appeals this sentence then it is entirely possible that the Court of Appeal could increase his total sentence by applying the maximum 2 years for each and every one of the 8 offences and still order them to run consecuatively (16 years).
Throw away the key I say.1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMB_e0PH3Hg&feature=youtu.be
