Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Chris Eagles rumoured to be joining on loan (2014)

1234568»

Comments

  • The sun refer to him as "ex-Man United star" in what world was he a star at United. Cheap clickbait as usual.
  • Swisdom
    Swisdom Posts: 14,977
    clive said:
    Wasn't there a story about him from prior to his Charlton days too?  Silly boy...though fair play for being with Jennifer Metcalfe!  He's done well for himself there
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,413
    edited September 2021
    Again?

    Edit - That was in  reference to the Discussion title not the drink driving
  • The sun refer to him as "ex-Man United star" in what world was he a star at United. Cheap clickbait as usual.
    And in a "state of undress", all that was missing was his shoes. And what difference does it make with the model and cost of the car. Would he have got a lighter sentence if the car was worth £10,000

    Laughable
  • Dave Rudd
    Dave Rudd Posts: 2,867
    Is he replacing Jaiyesimi?
  • The sun refer to him as "ex-Man United star" in what world was he a star at United. Cheap clickbait as usual.
    You will always be known for the biggest club you've played for! And star sounds better than reject...

    We've had that when an ex youth team player (who played perhaps 1 match in the EFL Cup) gets arrested 10 years later, having had a career in non league, and is described as a former Charlton player player.
  • He should have been sent down for crimes against hair. 
  • cafcfan
    cafcfan Posts: 11,200
    The sun refer to him as "ex-Man United star" in what world was he a star at United. Cheap clickbait as usual.
    And in a "state of undress", all that was missing was his shoes. And what difference does it make with the model and cost of the car. Would he have got a lighter sentence if the car was worth £10,000

    Laughable
    I thought the MINIMUM for DD was a 12-month ban. How come he only got 3 months I wonder?

  • Sponsored links:



  • cafcdave123
    cafcdave123 Posts: 11,491
    cafcfan said:
    The sun refer to him as "ex-Man United star" in what world was he a star at United. Cheap clickbait as usual.
    And in a "state of undress", all that was missing was his shoes. And what difference does it make with the model and cost of the car. Would he have got a lighter sentence if the car was worth £10,000

    Laughable
    I thought the MINIMUM for DD was a 12-month ban. How come he only got 3 months I wonder?
    I got 32 months
  • ricky_otto
    ricky_otto Posts: 22,600
    The sun refer to him as "ex-Man United star" in what world was he a star at United. Cheap clickbait as usual.
    Imagine the amount of hits they would have got if they had said “ex Charlton Athletic substitute”
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,057
    cafcfan said:
    The sun refer to him as "ex-Man United star" in what world was he a star at United. Cheap clickbait as usual.
    And in a "state of undress", all that was missing was his shoes. And what difference does it make with the model and cost of the car. Would he have got a lighter sentence if the car was worth £10,000

    Laughable
    I thought the MINIMUM for DD was a 12-month ban. How come he only got 3 months I wonder?
    I got 32 months
    Had you lost both shoes?
  • ct_addick
    ct_addick Posts: 4,338
    cafcfan said:
    The sun refer to him as "ex-Man United star" in what world was he a star at United. Cheap clickbait as usual.
    And in a "state of undress", all that was missing was his shoes. And what difference does it make with the model and cost of the car. Would he have got a lighter sentence if the car was worth £10,000

    Laughable
    I thought the MINIMUM for DD was a 12-month ban. How come he only got 3 months I wonder?
    I got 32 months
    Wow. Was it your first DD? That seems a heavy ban
  • cafcdave123
    cafcdave123 Posts: 11,491
    edited September 2021
    ct_addick said:
    cafcfan said:
    The sun refer to him as "ex-Man United star" in what world was he a star at United. Cheap clickbait as usual.
    And in a "state of undress", all that was missing was his shoes. And what difference does it make with the model and cost of the car. Would he have got a lighter sentence if the car was worth £10,000

    Laughable
    I thought the MINIMUM for DD was a 12-month ban. How come he only got 3 months I wonder?
    I got 32 months
    Wow. Was it your first DD? That seems a heavy ban
    it was my first and only.

    I blew 180 something, 35 was the limit at the time.

    huge costly mistake when I was younger.