Wasn't there a story about him from prior to his Charlton days too? Silly boy...though fair play for being with Jennifer Metcalfe! He's done well for himself there
The sun refer to him as "ex-Man United star" in what world was he a star at United. Cheap clickbait as usual.
And in a "state of undress", all that was missing was his shoes. And what difference does it make with the model and cost of the car. Would he have got a lighter sentence if the car was worth £10,000
The sun refer to him as "ex-Man United star" in what world was he a star at United. Cheap clickbait as usual.
You will always be known for the biggest club you've played for! And star sounds better than reject...
We've had that when an ex youth team player (who played perhaps 1 match in the EFL Cup) gets arrested 10 years later, having had a career in non league, and is described as a former Charlton player player.
The sun refer to him as "ex-Man United star" in what world was he a star at United. Cheap clickbait as usual.
And in a "state of undress", all that was missing was his shoes. And what difference does it make with the model and cost of the car. Would he have got a lighter sentence if the car was worth £10,000
Laughable
I thought the MINIMUM for DD was a 12-month ban. How come he only got 3 months I wonder?
The sun refer to him as "ex-Man United star" in what world was he a star at United. Cheap clickbait as usual.
And in a "state of undress", all that was missing was his shoes. And what difference does it make with the model and cost of the car. Would he have got a lighter sentence if the car was worth £10,000
Laughable
I thought the MINIMUM for DD was a 12-month ban. How come he only got 3 months I wonder?
The sun refer to him as "ex-Man United star" in what world was he a star at United. Cheap clickbait as usual.
And in a "state of undress", all that was missing was his shoes. And what difference does it make with the model and cost of the car. Would he have got a lighter sentence if the car was worth £10,000
Laughable
I thought the MINIMUM for DD was a 12-month ban. How come he only got 3 months I wonder?
The sun refer to him as "ex-Man United star" in what world was he a star at United. Cheap clickbait as usual.
And in a "state of undress", all that was missing was his shoes. And what difference does it make with the model and cost of the car. Would he have got a lighter sentence if the car was worth £10,000
Laughable
I thought the MINIMUM for DD was a 12-month ban. How come he only got 3 months I wonder?
The sun refer to him as "ex-Man United star" in what world was he a star at United. Cheap clickbait as usual.
And in a "state of undress", all that was missing was his shoes. And what difference does it make with the model and cost of the car. Would he have got a lighter sentence if the car was worth £10,000
Laughable
I thought the MINIMUM for DD was a 12-month ban. How come he only got 3 months I wonder?
I got 32 months
Wow. Was it your first DD? That seems a heavy ban
it was my first and only.
I blew 180 something, 35 was the limit at the time.
Comments
Edit - That was in reference to the Discussion title not the drink driving
Laughable
We've had that when an ex youth team player (who played perhaps 1 match in the EFL Cup) gets arrested 10 years later, having had a career in non league, and is described as a former Charlton player player.
I blew 180 something, 35 was the limit at the time.
huge costly mistake when I was younger.