Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Surrey ccc

18485878990190

Comments

  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,679
    177 for 7.
    One over to go.
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,679
    188 after 20 overs.
    Decent total me thinks
  • Frontline9
    Frontline9 Posts: 764
    This is going to be extremely tight for us. Poor from Stoneman. Looked tremendously uncomfortable out there. As controversial as this is - I'm just not sure about him in one day games.
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,930

    This is going to be extremely tight for us. Poor from Stoneman. Looked tremendously uncomfortable out there. As controversial as this is - I'm just not sure about him in one day games.

    He's been great in the 50 over stuff but I agree he is not really suited to T20. Having said that I would have said the same about Sibley before his innings today.
  • MrOneLung
    MrOneLung Posts: 26,857
    You should have enough. Jamie got battered !!
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,679
    Get in Tom Curren.
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,679
    Chopra clean bowled
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,930
    Chopra chops on!
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,679
    Sam now 31 for 2
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,930
    Sam gets Dan Lawrence!
  • Sponsored links:



  • Frontline9
    Frontline9 Posts: 764
    Brilliant start!! Come on the rey!!
  • Frontline9
    Frontline9 Posts: 764

    This is going to be extremely tight for us. Poor from Stoneman. Looked tremendously uncomfortable out there. As controversial as this is - I'm just not sure about him in one day games.

    He's been great in the 50 over stuff but I agree he is not really suited to T20. Having said that I would have said the same about Sibley before his innings today.
    I don't know what it was and shoot me down but his innings last Saturday was an odd one for me. He never really pushed on in the way Hales did. He could of but didn't. Was extremely odd seeing someone get so many runs yet so slowly in a 1 day game.
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,930

    This is going to be extremely tight for us. Poor from Stoneman. Looked tremendously uncomfortable out there. As controversial as this is - I'm just not sure about him in one day games.

    He's been great in the 50 over stuff but I agree he is not really suited to T20. Having said that I would have said the same about Sibley before his innings today.
    I don't know what it was and shoot me down but his innings last Saturday was an odd one for me. He never really pushed on in the way Hales did. He could of but didn't. Was extremely odd seeing someone get so many runs yet so slowly in a 1 day game.
    You're right. But that is the type of player he is. He doesn't really have the capability to kick on to another gear. He plays the anchor role and needs other players around him to kick on. His innings was good on Sunday but I agree he needed to kick on. But I don't blame him for the loss...
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,930

    This is going to be extremely tight for us. Poor from Stoneman. Looked tremendously uncomfortable out there. As controversial as this is - I'm just not sure about him in one day games.

    He's been great in the 50 over stuff but I agree he is not really suited to T20. Having said that I would have said the same about Sibley before his innings today.
    I don't know what it was and shoot me down but his innings last Saturday was an odd one for me. He never really pushed on in the way Hales did. He could of but didn't. Was extremely odd seeing someone get so many runs yet so slowly in a 1 day game.
    You're right. But that is the type of player he is. He doesn't really have the capability to kick on to another gear. He plays the anchor role and needs other players around him to kick on. His innings was good on Sunday but I agree he needed to kick on. But I don't blame him for the loss...
    What I'm trying to say there is you're right to an extent but that's his way and the others should be able to provide the impetus.
  • Frontline9
    Frontline9 Posts: 764
    Yeah agree. I don't blame him at all for the loss. I blame the rest of the sides poor batting and bloody Hales being an animal. Just was a weird one for me.

    A wicket soon will do us here. Can't have these two building a partnership.

    As for that magic trick.... wtf
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,930
    Radio commentators calling Sibley an off spinner. He is a leggie surely even if you don't know about the player you can work out what he bowls by watching it.
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,930
    Need a couple of quick ones here.
  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,679
    Be patient chaps wickets are coming
  • Frontline9
    Frontline9 Posts: 764
    got him!!!! 76-3!!
  • Frontline9
    Frontline9 Posts: 764
    Get in there!

    This gives me far more enjoyment than Charlton these days.
  • Sponsored links:



  • blackpool72
    blackpool72 Posts: 23,679
    Told ya: )
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,930

    Be patient chaps wickets are coming

    Nicely called. Borthwick starts with a googly and bowls Westly who was looking dangerous
  • Frontline9
    Frontline9 Posts: 764
    Get Ravi gone now please.

    Can't stand Nasser... so biased (which is expected).
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,930
    Ten Doscate comes in he can be dangerous. Won't be comfortable until he is out!
  • Frontline9
    Frontline9 Posts: 764
    Nice over that. 81-3 from 10
  • Frontline9
    Frontline9 Posts: 764
    We were 85-4 at this stage
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 16,930
    Run rate nearly 11 an over. Tough ask but small boundaries so not done yet...
  • Frontline9
    Frontline9 Posts: 764
    Bollocks
  • Frontline9
    Frontline9 Posts: 764
    I think if we get Ravi gone soon then TDS not long after, we'll do this
  • Frontline9
    Frontline9 Posts: 764
    Not looking good this