Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Michael Morrison - signed for Pompey (p6)

12346

Comments

  • aliwibble
    aliwibble Posts: 26,299
    Signed for Pompey:
    Still can't get used to him with hair.
  • Huskaris
    Huskaris Posts: 9,853
    Cracking signing for Pompey. 
  • Scoham
    Scoham Posts: 37,384
    aliwibble said:
    Signed for Pompey:
    Still can't get used to him with hair.
    I always think that, seems to have had hair at every club he’s played for except us.
  • wmcf123
    wmcf123 Posts: 5,827
    I’d have pushed to get him back .
  • charltonkeston
    charltonkeston Posts: 7,367
    I thought a big loss when he left us.
    He'll be a good signing for Pompey.
  • cafctom
    cafctom Posts: 11,372
    Has had a very good career. Been a regular pretty much everywhere he has gone since he was with us.

    Played about 370 games at Championship level since our 2012 promotion.
  • Bostonaddick
    Bostonaddick Posts: 817
    Morrison had a bad year last year according to Reading fans.  He was never the quickest but seemed to have lost a step last year.  Not saying he won’t be good in league one but at his age the downward slide in athleticism comes quick
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,331
    Huskaris said:
    Cracking signing for Pompey. 
    Why, do they need a defence coach?
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,331
    This is the kind of signing which, if we'd made, I'd have been pretty livid tbh
  • SELR_addicks
    SELR_addicks Posts: 15,469
    edited July 2022
    Decent no-nonsense defender but can imagine he'll get torn apart by any striker with pace this season. 

    In League One they are few and far between however. Can see Aneke giving him fits. 
  • Sponsored links:



  • Pelling1993
    Pelling1993 Posts: 6,678
    Scoham said:
    aliwibble said:
    Signed for Pompey:
    Still can't get used to him with hair.
    I always think that, seems to have had hair at every club he’s played for except us.
    That's what Charlton does to a man! 
  • cafctom
    cafctom Posts: 11,372
    Leuth said:
    This is the kind of signing which, if we'd made, I'd have been pretty livid tbh
    Why?

    A player who has been consistent in the Championship for 10 straight years. Maybe not one for the future but certainly not a bad signing. 
  • king addick
    king addick Posts: 3,705
    I like Morrison but most of us were giving pelters to Pearce that he was too old etc but would have signed Morrison? 

    Makes zero sense....
  • kentaddick
    kentaddick Posts: 18,729
    great signing for them. One of those individuals that if we had actually been run properly would've easily stayed with us for the last 10 years imo. Him and Yann's sales were stupid at the time, utterly ridiculous in hindsight. 
  • kentaddick
    kentaddick Posts: 18,729
    Leuth said:
    This is the kind of signing which, if we'd made, I'd have been pretty livid tbh
    a player with bags of experience of regularly playing at a higher level and had been promoted as runaway champions twice from this division with two different clubs? Would love some one like that here. Not as a big signing, but more as a pearce/andy hughes type of signing.
  • sam3110
    sam3110 Posts: 21,280
    Really good signing 5 years ago

    In 2022? Not so much
  • Scoham
    Scoham Posts: 37,384
    Leuth said:
    This is the kind of signing which, if we'd made, I'd have been pretty livid tbh
    a player with bags of experience of regularly playing at a higher level and had been promoted as runaway champions twice from this division with two different clubs? Would love some one like that here. Not as a big signing, but more as a pearce/andy hughes type of signing.
    Only a few months younger than Pearce, a bit of a gamble that he’s still got the legs for where Pompey want to be.
  • Todds_right_hook
    Todds_right_hook Posts: 10,885
    cafctom said:
    Leuth said:
    This is the kind of signing which, if we'd made, I'd have been pretty livid tbh
    Why?

    A player who has been consistent in the Championship for 10 straight years. Maybe not one for the future but certainly not a bad signing. 
    Ben watson, harry arter?

    both of these played at a higher level than Morrison 
  • CAFCsayer
    CAFCsayer Posts: 10,228
    sam3110 said:
    Really good signing 5 years ago

    In 2022? Not so much
    This... I'd have said it was a good signing even 2 years ago, but he's lost a yard of pace and on the way down
  • cafcfan1990
    cafcfan1990 Posts: 12,811
    cafctom said:
    Leuth said:
    This is the kind of signing which, if we'd made, I'd have been pretty livid tbh
    Why?

    A player who has been consistent in the Championship for 10 straight years. Maybe not one for the future but certainly not a bad signing. 
    Ben watson, harry arter?

    both of these played at a higher level than Morrison 
    Sam Vokes, James McClean, Barry Bannan?
  • Sponsored links:



  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    edited July 2022
    cafctom said:
    Leuth said:
    This is the kind of signing which, if we'd made, I'd have been pretty livid tbh
    Why?

    A player who has been consistent in the Championship for 10 straight years. Maybe not one for the future but certainly not a bad signing. 
    Ben watson, harry arter?

    both of these played at a higher level than Morrison 
    Sam Vokes, James McClean, Barry Bannan?
    32, 32 and 33.  So all older than Gunter was when we signed him.......

    Getting the right "oldy" is almost as hard as getting the right youngster out of non league.

    Doesn't mean it's a bad idea to try though.
  • cafctom
    cafctom Posts: 11,372
    cafctom said:
    Leuth said:
    This is the kind of signing which, if we'd made, I'd have been pretty livid tbh
    Why?

    A player who has been consistent in the Championship for 10 straight years. Maybe not one for the future but certainly not a bad signing. 
    Ben watson, harry arter?

    both of these played at a higher level than Morrison 
    I know, but nobody was livid about those signings when they came in - as we quite rightfully thought they could add something. 
  • Huskaris
    Huskaris Posts: 9,853
    edited July 2022
    .
  • thenewbie
    thenewbie Posts: 11,001
    CAFCsayer said:
    sam3110 said:
    Really good signing 5 years ago

    In 2022? Not so much
    This... I'd have said it was a good signing even 2 years ago, but he's lost a yard of pace and on the way down
    Yeah, I'd happily sign the Morrison we let go but the current version I'm not fussed about.
  • Karim_myBagheri
    Karim_myBagheri Posts: 12,725
    great signing for them. One of those individuals that if we had actually been run properly would've easily stayed with us for the last 10 years imo. Him and Yann's sales were stupid at the time, utterly ridiculous in hindsight. 
    i agree but you dont need hindsight it was obviously terrible decision at the time. When Yann was sold i knew from that point we were in trouble with RD as owner. 
  • Chippycafc
    Chippycafc Posts: 14,150
    Huskaris said:
    Cracking signing for Pompey. 

    Pompey boys at work well pleased with this.
  • cafcfan1990
    cafcfan1990 Posts: 12,811
    Cafc43v3r said:
    cafctom said:
    Leuth said:
    This is the kind of signing which, if we'd made, I'd have been pretty livid tbh
    Why?

    A player who has been consistent in the Championship for 10 straight years. Maybe not one for the future but certainly not a bad signing. 
    Ben watson, harry arter?

    both of these played at a higher level than Morrison 
    Sam Vokes, James McClean, Barry Bannan?
    32, 32 and 33.  So all older than Gunter was when we signed him.......

    Getting the right "oldy" is almost as hard as getting the right youngster out of non league.

    Doesn't mean it's a bad idea to try though.
    Agreed, age means nothing.  In hindsight, the signs were there with Arter but I think Gunter just didn't work out, still maintain he wasn't a bad signing on paper. I think being insistent on signing players who are under 27 just because of the last few years is an overreaction. Made plenty of shite signings who were much younger too. 
  • CAFCsayer said:
    sam3110 said:
    Really good signing 5 years ago

    In 2022? Not so much
    This... I'd have said it was a good signing even 2 years ago, but he's lost a yard of pace and on the way down
    Exactly, there's a reason he was released by a side who had the worst defensive record in the championship last season and who would've been relegated had Derby not been deducted a million points.
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,874
    great signing for them. One of those individuals that if we had actually been run properly would've easily stayed with us for the last 10 years imo. Him and Yann's sales were stupid at the time, utterly ridiculous in hindsight. 
    i agree but you dont need hindsight it was obviously terrible decision at the time. When Yann was sold i knew from that point we were in trouble with RD as owner. 
    The Yann sale did make some sort of sense though. Player with 6 months left on his contract, offered a better deal by Bournemouth a club owned by a secretive Russian, who broke the FFP rules.

    The Morrison sale was ludicrous in comparison, as we forced out our 3rd choice CB - i.e. a player one injury/suspension away from the first team - someone who had just signed a new contract
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,874
    Cafc43v3r said:
    cafctom said:
    Leuth said:
    This is the kind of signing which, if we'd made, I'd have been pretty livid tbh
    Why?

    A player who has been consistent in the Championship for 10 straight years. Maybe not one for the future but certainly not a bad signing. 
    Ben watson, harry arter?

    both of these played at a higher level than Morrison 
    Sam Vokes, James McClean, Barry Bannan?
    32, 32 and 33.  So all older than Gunter was when we signed him.......

    Getting the right "oldy" is almost as hard as getting the right youngster out of non league.

    Doesn't mean it's a bad idea to try though.
    Signing a "playmaker" oldie can be a brilliant move if you build a team of younger players around him to do the physical side, and let him use his skills. Wes Hoolahan had 2 brilliant seasons at Cambridge in his late 30s

    Signing a midfield workhorse who's legs have gone (i.e. Arter) isn't such a good idea...