Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Olympic Stadium; our day in court

12467107

Comments

  • What times Kick-off ?

    It was 10am I think...
  • Late. LLDC not impressing Judge Judy.
  • Winning 5 - 0 Richard's scored a fantastic hat trick.

    Great stuff !

    Richard won't flag in the 2nd half !

  • Been in secret session since 12.30, not allowed back til 4.30.
  • Sponsored links:


  • That's what LLDC said when Richard asked them to explain Karen Brady's outburst.

    Much squirming because WHU have the power of veto by exercising consents/agreements but no specific veto.

    Interpret as you choose. WHU prefer one interpretation LLDC another.
  • Another day to be set to finalise hearing. Delaying tactics rule supreme. Richard superb.

    No resolution today?

    Did you speak to the FOI people about how the secret part went?
  • Sponsored links:


  • IA said:

    Another day to be set to finalise hearing. Delaying tactics rule supreme. Richard superb.

    No resolution today?

    Did you speak to the FOI people about how the secret part went?
    We got an agreed written statement read out. Nothing of note just waffle. Agreed to release hospitality details which are are already public!

    IOC barrister told Richard secret session was mostly her cross examining LLDC and not to read it negatively.

    Quote of the day from one of the Tribunal judges to LLDC witness "are you saying your commercial department are so weedy they will be turned over in any negotiations?"


    Barry Hearn famously said he wouldn't trust them to run a newsagents. I think he has a point.
  • IA said:

    Another day to be set to finalise hearing. Delaying tactics rule supreme. Richard superb.

    No resolution today?

    Did you speak to the FOI people about how the secret part went?
    We got an agreed written statement read out. Nothing of note just waffle. Agreed to release hospitality details which are are already public!

    IOC barrister told Richard secret session was mostly her cross examining LLDC and not to read it negatively.

    Quote of the day from one of the Tribunal judges to LLDC witness "are you saying your commercial department are so weedy they will be turned over in any negotiations?"


    Perhaps they need some negotiation training from the lovely Lady Brady!! I'm sure she wouldn't charge much!!

    Well done Prague!
  • redman said:

    Prague, on behalf of us all well done. You make the point about being expensive for us. I, and am sure many more, would gladly chip in. How are the costs being funded?

    The cost of the Tribunal and indeed the LLDC's expensive legal advice (£21,000 ) is met by you, the taxpayer.

    My costs, don't worry about it. I need to come home and see my ageing Mum, and can park the travel costs as a business expense.

  • well done Prague and than you
  • Prague well done keep us informed of the final outcome.
  • Curiously the Sun article linked above has disappeared. But this is sound...:

    http://www.theguardian.com/football/2016/jan/25/west-ham-face-possibility-of-groundsharing-at-olympic-stadium

    So when the LLDC rep says that "negotiations are very difficult if you've got an anchor", I assume she means if you've given a ludicrously advantageous deal to the anchor tenant?
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!