The man creates stories that are full of half truths and the partial facts , he then turns them in to snippets of info fed from the club as whole truths
look at the directors story last week
made it seem that talks had taken place with directors and 4 were satisfied and 3 had not
total bullshit
because someone had contacted the directors and asked if they were willing to discuss and possibly make a deal
he then puts out the spin that 4 have agreed
now multiply this by every shred of nonsensical rubbish he has released over the past decades
the man peddles shite and some still lap it up due to his past involvement with success
Let's keep an open mind. He had the choice to walk away and discredit Duchatelet to hasten his departure, or become a double agent and a one man underground resistance fighter. Airman might be a front man and Murray is the secret head of CARD and when the new owners finally take over he will crawl out of his bunker hands held high saying don't shoot I was on your side all the time.
Oh I totally believe this (apart from being head of CARD :-) ) I am sure when the takeover happens he will talk about how he always took the view that it was better to work with the Belgian than to leave him to his own devices because things would have been a lot worse. I'm sure he will be saddened to see what has happened to the club that "he" built up & disagreed with how the Belgian had run the club down but was powerless to do anything other than advise him against various actions. Thanks Dick Quisling but you're not wanted here
Mr Murray when RD took control you said something along the lines of you would be the conduit between him and the fans. I know past statements you have made have not helped matters, as your hopes never materialised.
However, isn't it reasonable to hear a statement from yourself regarding Lee Bowyer and the sale of the club ?
I’m not sure he posts on here.
Thread titled "Richard Murrary club chairman"
With 20k views.
"It's just a message board thing"
I'm 99% certain he will be scrolling the thread. It's not hard to find.
Maybe he will, but I don’t understand the point of asking him a question. Do you expect him to sign up for an account and reply??
I thought he was on here as Redrobo.
Bloody cheek.
Although I did hear he was trying to get a foreign banker to buy us.
I heard a rumour, roughly 18 months ago....from someone who was, funnily enough, a Reading fan.
He said Roland was going to buy them but Murrary intervened and steered the ship in our direction.
Murrary, effectively.....was actually what brought Roland into Charlton.
But, like I say ...this is hearsay and I have nothing to prove it.
Do I believe it to be true?
Personally, I do. Yes.
May be true, but at the time we were out of cash, in need of a buyer and frankly a multi ‘00m net worth individual from europe whose money is clean looked a bloody good thing.
I heard a rumour, roughly 18 months ago....from someone who was, funnily enough, a Reading fan.
He said Roland was going to buy them but Murrary intervened and steered the ship in our direction.
Murrary, effectively.....was actually what brought Roland into Charlton.
But, like I say ...this is hearsay and I have nothing to prove it.
Do I believe it to be true?
Personally, I do. Yes.
May be true, but at the time we were out of cash, in need of a buyer and frankly a multi ‘00m net worth individual from europe whose money is clean looked a bloody good thing.
It's a shame then that he wasn't aware of the Rat's previous shenanigans at Standard or maybe he was? 😯
Let's keep an open mind. He had the choice to walk away and discredit Duchatelet to hasten his departure, or become a double agent and a one man underground resistance fighter. Airman might be a front man and Murray is the secret head of CARD and when the new owners finally take over he will crawl out of his bunker hands held high saying don't shoot I was on your side all the time.
Oh I totally believe this (apart from being head of CARD :-) ) I am sure when the takeover happens he will talk about how he always took the view that it was better to work with the Belgian than to leave him to his own devices because things would have been a lot worse. I'm sure he will be saddened to see what has happened to the club that "he" built up & disagreed with how the Belgian had run the club down but was powerless to do anything other than advise him against various actions. Thanks Dick Quisling but you're not wanted here
Well we might thing a little bit more of him if he admitted it at least!
This. Had a golden opportunity to do this back in Jan-16 when he did the 'Q&A' I think the majority of fans would have accepted Murray felt he had to keep backing RD but enough was enough etc and if he'd stepped down even then 2 years after RD's arrival his reputation IMO wouldn't be perfect but it'd be a lot better and well received than how he's seen now.
He has something in common with Roland. An inability to admit he is wrong despite it being as plain as the nose on his face! I don't think he has lost his marbles like Roland though - at least that is an excuse the mad old scroat has!
Well we might thing a little bit more of him if he admitted it at least!
This. Had a golden opportunity to do this back in Jan-16 when he did the 'Q&A' I think the majority of fans would have accepted Murray felt he had to keep backing RD but enough was enough etc and if he'd stepped down even then 2 years after RD's arrival his reputation IMO wouldn't be perfect but it'd be a lot better and well received than how he's seen now.
This was over 3 years ago...
Whatever happened then is in the past. If RM were to try to do the same thing now, he would just be laughed/shouted down, and receive a torrent of abuse from more vociferous supporters.
There is a time to just turn around, and walk into the sunset.
Nice of you lot to be judge and jury as to what RM should have said and done, but we have no idea what he has been saying or doing to mitigate the Rolly factors. If he were to say this I suspect that most of you would a) not believe it, b) suggest that he would say that, c) say that he should have walked away, d) that it only did it to keep a place at the table, and e) he was wrong and should have spoken out.
No doubt that there will now be someone who is ‘really in the know’ who will be pointing out some facts but be a bit short on any actual evidence. Before I decide on guilt I would like to hear the defence.
I also note that Bowyer seems to appreciate his advice, and others have been equally appreciative, which to me suggests that there is another side to this story.
For me, there is only one person who has proven without doubt that he has acted against the best interests of our club. Roland.
In the absence of any defence, I am quite happy to hang him on all the evidence that we do have .....
Comments
Although I did hear he was trying to get a foreign banker to buy us.
Don't think Alan Murrary is involved.
What takeover?
He knows, absolutely, that he has screwed up. He's burnt his bridges, and he knows it.
He's just waiting for the takeover, and the Coup de Grace...
Whatever happened then is in the past. If RM were to try to do the same thing now, he would just be laughed/shouted down, and receive a torrent of abuse from more vociferous supporters.
There is a time to just turn around, and walk into the sunset.
RM is at that stage now...
The day you sling your hook with this Belgian pr*ck will be a happy day in SE7.
In footballing terms it’s a long, long time since he had a positive impact on our club.
He was the way to get at Duchatelet.