Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Evans Conviction overturned (ed. signs for Chesterfield)

1101113151619

Comments

  • Shows what 50 grand can do.

    Shows what 10 grand a week can do too.
  • So pleased for him. Hopes that horrible little slag rots.
  • Flag alert!
  • Clearly the key aspect was that her identity illegally got out, as otherwise the men who slept with her before and after Ched Evans wouldn't have known that it was the same person...

    This is an interesting issue. In pretty much every other area of law, the defence is allowed bring in witnesses to dispute the veracity and character of the victim or other witnesses the prosecution brings in. Surely this is impossible for the defence to do if the identify of the victim is kept secret? The defendant's name is made public in order to allow other victims to come forward and help the prosecution, but the defence cannot normally pursue this line of defence if need be. It is difficult to get any idea of how someone in the courtroom takes in the evidence as I imagine the cases hinges very much so on the testimony of the victim and the accused. And now if Ched's verdict was changed purely because of this witness who was only possible to find due to the identify of the victim being made public, then that exposes a flaw in the system. There is still a very strong argument and very good reasons why the victim's identity should remain anonymous, but clearly the status quo is currently not fit for purpose.
  • Greenie Jr preparing to celebrate by bagging some young lady, taking her to a hotel room and then springing his mate on her halfway through, as all healthy red-blooded young men do for the benefit of their constitutions
  • Sponsored links:


  • Can't quite remember being as depressed by a thread before.

    Irritated, yes, angry yes, depressed, no.

    Can we have an Ignore Thread button so once you have decided you would rather not know what has been posted anymore it just doesn't appear on the list?
  • I do realise I can just exceecise self restraint, not a strong point.
  • Neither is it with Ched Evans
  • edited October 2016
    He's not guilty. However, he will live with the fact he is a complete wanker for the rest of his life. Not a criminal, but a despicable little shit who will get his fair share of abuse by decent honest people wherever he goes. He will be unwanted in decent company and shunned at every place he chooses to go.
  • The other guy is just as bad if not worse imo
  • Being immoral is not a criminal act. You hear of to many birds doing this, acting a slag, regretting it then crying rape. Bollocks
  • Had thought @Greenie Junior was trolling.

    Now even more depressed he/she (guessing he) may be actually saying it how he/she sees it.

    Please let you be a troll.
  • Sponsored links:


  • The fact that there was seven Females on the jury, and Evans was found not guilty tells you that the new evidence did make a hell of a difference.
    The sisterhood does seem to work out other women's intentions.

    Ched Evans Lust and morals has made him pay a high price and cost him years of his career including a place in the last Euro's ?
    That doesn't make him Guilty of a Crime, but all Young rich footballers should heed the lessons of this very shabby affair.

    He would never have got a place ahead of Simon! Talk sense!
  • Curb_It said:

    So pleased for him. Hopes that horrible little slag rots.


    Classy. Cos he's a fine upstanding citizen isn't he. The bloke is a scumbag. Horrible comment from you.

    What a grim read this is.

    Had thought @Greenie Junior was trolling.

    Now even more depressed he/she (guessing he) may be actually saying it how he/she sees it.

    Please let you be a troll.

    Get out of it, a bird lied and imprisoned a bloke falsely, and he's the scumbag?? Where's the logic?

    He's morally questionable but should he have had his freedom taken away cos some horrible bird regretted being a wrongun? Absolutely not and if you disagree then you're wrong.
  • What was the lie ?
  • Curb_It said:

    So pleased for him. Hopes that horrible little slag rots.


    Classy. Cos he's a fine upstanding citizen isn't he. The bloke is a scumbag. Horrible comment from you.

    What a grim read this is.

    Had thought @Greenie Junior was trolling.

    Now even more depressed he/she (guessing he) may be actually saying it how he/she sees it.

    Please let you be a troll.

    Get out of it, a bird lied and imprisoned a bloke falsely, and he's the scumbag?? Where's the logic?

    He's morally questionable but should he have had his freedom taken away cos some horrible bird regretted being a wrongun? Absolutely not and if you disagree then you're wrong.
    Call me old fashioned but I think it's the CPS that decides whether to prosecute not a 'bird' as you (and Clayton McDonald) so delightfully put it.
  • Curb_It said:

    So pleased for him. Hopes that horrible little slag rots.


    Classy. Cos he's a fine upstanding citizen isn't he. The bloke is a scumbag. Horrible comment from you.

    What a grim read this is.

    Had thought @Greenie Junior was trolling.

    Now even more depressed he/she (guessing he) may be actually saying it how he/she sees it.

    Please let you be a troll.

    Get out of it, a bird lied and imprisoned a bloke falsely, and he's the scumbag?? Where's the logic?

    He's morally questionable but should he have had his freedom taken away cos some horrible bird regretted being a wrongun? Absolutely not and if you disagree then you're wrong.
    Hurray, I was right. Under the Bridge.
  • What was the lie ?

    She said he raped her
  • Curb_It said:

    So pleased for him. Hopes that horrible little slag rots.


    Classy. Cos he's a fine upstanding citizen isn't he. The bloke is a scumbag. Horrible comment from you.

    What a grim read this is.

    Had thought @Greenie Junior was trolling.

    Now even more depressed he/she (guessing he) may be actually saying it how he/she sees it.

    Please let you be a troll.

    Get out of it, a bird lied and imprisoned a bloke falsely, and he's the scumbag?? Where's the logic?

    He's morally questionable but should he have had his freedom taken away cos some horrible bird regretted being a wrongun? Absolutely not and if you disagree then you're wrong.
    Hurray, I was right. Under the Bridge.
    Div.
  • What was the lie ?

    She said he raped her
    Ignorant of the facts. Try and find out the facts before you make yourself look even more foolish.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!