Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Trust make formal complaint to FA

1356

Comments

  • timken
    timken Posts: 1,003
    ver professional
  • Rob7Lee
    Rob7Lee Posts: 9,617
    Thanks for all the positive comments.

    The CAS Trust is already one of the best supported however it would be really helpful if any who aren't currently members, sign up. The more official members we have the greater our clout.

    £5 a year, less than a burger and pint.......

    You can sign up on the website.
  • _MrDick
    _MrDick Posts: 13,122
    Well done, Steve. Excellent piece of work
  • bellz2002
    bellz2002 Posts: 1,363
    Nice one Trust. Very pleased I am a member and you are representing us (IMO) well.
  • TellyTubby
    TellyTubby Posts: 3,553
    edited May 2016

    Why don't you take your evidence to the police then, I am sure that they would be interested in your information.
  • Mametz
    Mametz Posts: 1,258
    edited May 2016

    Why would I want to do that?
  • LoOkOuT
    LoOkOuT Posts: 10,871
    LuckyReds said:

    I would like to add that I'm under the impression - and open to being corrected - that The Metropolitan Police Service have actually intervened on more than one occasion where staff representing Charlton Athletic have been aggressive towards fans.

    When the Met feel you've been too aggressive against football fans, you should really have a word with yourself!
  • iainment
    iainment Posts: 8,044
    edited May 2016
    Mametz said:

    Why would I want to do that?

    To justify your pedantic, snide dig at CAST.

  • LoOkOuT
    LoOkOuT Posts: 10,871
    The only crime here, is the inability to quote properly!!!
  • Mametz
    Mametz Posts: 1,258
    iainment said:

    Mametz said:

    Mametz said:

    LuckyReds said:

    Mametz said:

    mogodon said:

    Mametz said:

    thenewbie said:

    Mametz said:

    According to the letter CAST say that, either as an independent body or as a member of CARD, they do not condone illegal acts. Surely the throwing of hundreds or thousands of beach and stress balls onto the pitch as organised by CARD were illegal acts.

    Erm... nope. Quite apart from anything else, if there was even the silliest and most pedantic way to possibly spin that as actually illegal, KM would have at least attempted it. The fact she has not speaks volumes.
    Erm..I think it is.
    Ok, if illegal (as opposed to against club rules) what law has been broken?
    The Football Offences Act 1991.

    "It is an offence at a designated football match to throw anything at or towards...the playing area or any area adjacent to the playing area....without lawful authority or lawful excuse...."
    Perhaps the subtlety was lost on you:
    LuckyReds said:

    Mametz said:

    According to the letter CAST say that, either as an independent body or as a member of CARD, they do not condone illegal acts. Surely the throwing of hundreds or thousands of beach and stress balls onto the pitch as organised by CARD were illegal acts.

    I prefer blondes, but my mate is currently going at it with a redhead...
    CARD is not CAST who are not CARD. They are two seperate entities.

    To quote the specific part of the CAST release:
    Under no circumstances does Charlton Athletic Supporters Trust, either independently or as a member of the protest group Coalition Against Roland Duchatelet (CARD), condone any direct personal abuse or illegal action against the club, the owner, the CEO or any employees. If Meire has evidence of any criminal acts, then we urge her to report these to the police.
    Essentially CAST are stating that:

    (a) They do not condone personal abuse or illegal actions against the club as an independent organisation;
    (b) They do not condone personal abuse or illegal actions against the club as a member of CARD*;
    (c) Meire should report any such behaviour to the police.

    I think you're getting at (b), but it's arguable that not all members of CARD have been behind every individual action. It's also worth noting that, with regards to (c), there's been a heavy presence at our recent matches by The Metropolitan Police in an effort of preventing any breaches of the peace - they have not deemed anything worthy of an arrest other than a lone pitch invader to my knowledge.

    I would like to add that I'm under the impression - and open to being corrected - that The Metropolitan Police Service have actually intervened on more than one occasion where staff representing Charlton Athletic have been aggressive towards fans.
    No, I haven't missed any subtlety. CARD have been repeatedly involved and directing illegal acts. CAST are members of CARD and by being so and indeed remaining so have to accept they have been condoning illegal acts.

    Whether Katrien reported these acts or whether the Police responded to those acts is irrelevant. The law was broken.

    I'm not attacking CAST for being involved in these protests, ( I have taken part in these protests) but I believe that there letter is technically incorrect.
    Why don't you take your evidence to the police then, I am sure that they would be interested in your information.
    Why would I want to do that?
    To justify your pedantic, snide dig at CAST.


    It was neither pedantic nor snide.

    They said something in their letter that was clearly misleading. That has nothing to do with pedantry. My concern was that it could lessen the impact of their letter if they were not entirely open about their involvement in illegal acts, especially as they are calling for an enquiry into Katrien's behaviour. I feel that they may be leaving themselves open to accusations of being disingenuous. I support both CAST and CARD in their attempts to rid our club of the current regime and I made it clear that I have been involved in some of those illegal acts. However, I see no reason that my support for these actions means I shouldn't point out an error when I see one.

    I actually think that the word " snide" more accurately describes your criticism of me.

  • Sponsored links:



  • iainment
    iainment Posts: 8,044
    Whatever.
  • bexleyaddick
    bexleyaddick Posts: 479
    edited May 2016
    Great letter but, if talking about the subject of bringing the game into disrepute, I would have added the fact that she mentions mothers not wanting to bring their children to the club yet just a year ago she was sanctioning an advertisement in which a couple were having sex on the pitch. Surely this is part of that inappropriate activity?
  • lancashire lad
    lancashire lad Posts: 15,642
    well done CAST
  • vff
    vff Posts: 6,897
    edited May 2016
    The Trust letter is very good. It pulls together & clearly explains Charlton Athletic supporters positive history as part of the move to challenge racism in football. Katrien Meire's ignorant, ill judged comments shows her total lack of understanding and lack of respect for Charlton supporters & the club's history. Unbelievable from the CEO who is supposed to promote a good image of the club.
  • Saga Lout
    Saga Lout Posts: 6,845
    The FA surely must take this seriously?
  • Tutt-Tutt
    Tutt-Tutt Posts: 3,279
    Well done CAST.
  • bromleyjohn
    bromleyjohn Posts: 5,987
    well written letter and fully supported by me. Keep up the good work you do in the usual dignified way. Well done.
  • shirty5
    shirty5 Posts: 19,252
    Saga Lout said:

    The FA surely must take this seriously?

    They will brush it under the carpet like everything else that is too much trouble for them to deal with. Personally I would send this to the Kick it Out campaign and ask what their views are.
  • Off_it
    Off_it Posts: 28,914
    shirty5 said:

    Saga Lout said:

    The FA surely must take this seriously?

    They will brush it under the carpet like everything else that is too much trouble for them to deal with. Personally I would send this to the Kick it Out campaign and ask what their views are.
    That's a good idea.
  • Hartleypete
    Hartleypete Posts: 4,704
    Mametz said:


    No, I haven't missed any subtlety. CARD have been repeatedly involved and directing illegal acts. CAST are members of CARD and by being so and indeed remaining so have to accept they have been condoning illegal acts.

    Whether Katrien reported these acts or whether the Police responded to those acts is irrelevant. The law was broken.

    I'm not attacking CAST for being involved in these protests, ( I have taken part in these protests) but I believe that there letter is technically incorrect.

    Just because the FA say you can not do something doesn't make it illegal.

  • Sponsored links:



  • Mametz
    Mametz Posts: 1,258

    Mametz said:


    No, I haven't missed any subtlety. CARD have been repeatedly involved and directing illegal acts. CAST are members of CARD and by being so and indeed remaining so have to accept they have been condoning illegal acts.

    Whether Katrien reported these acts or whether the Police responded to those acts is irrelevant. The law was broken.

    I'm not attacking CAST for being involved in these protests, ( I have taken part in these protests) but I believe that there letter is technically incorrect.

    Just because the FA say you can not do something doesn't make it illegal.
    Quite right. The trouble is it is not the FA saying this but the law of the land as passed by parliament, therefore it is illegal.
  • Goonerhater
    Goonerhater Posts: 12,677
    just a thought but why not also send it to EUFA ? RD operates his EgoCult across Europe so why not?
    Maybe the "transfers" of team ownership and players maybe of some interest
  • PragueAddick
    PragueAddick Posts: 22,175
    Some good ideas put forward above which we will look at.

    I must say that I recall even Peter Varney had trouble getting a response out of UEFA when he complained about something on our behalf. I can't remember what it was but I remember some UEFA nob saying about it to the press " and now a small club has a problem with it". We were in the PL at the time
  • iainment
    iainment Posts: 8,044
    Mametz said:

    Mametz said:


    No, I haven't missed any subtlety. CARD have been repeatedly involved and directing illegal acts. CAST are members of CARD and by being so and indeed remaining so have to accept they have been condoning illegal acts.

    Whether Katrien reported these acts or whether the Police responded to those acts is irrelevant. The law was broken.

    I'm not attacking CAST for being involved in these protests, ( I have taken part in these protests) but I believe that there letter is technically incorrect.

    Just because the FA say you can not do something doesn't make it illegal.
    Quite right. The trouble is it is not the FA saying this but the law of the land as passed by parliament, therefore it is illegal.
    Maybe not snide, I think pompous is a better descriptor for you.
  • Mametz
    Mametz Posts: 1,258
    iainment said:

    Mametz said:

    Mametz said:


    No, I haven't missed any subtlety. CARD have been repeatedly involved and directing illegal acts. CAST are members of CARD and by being so and indeed remaining so have to accept they have been condoning illegal acts.

    Whether Katrien reported these acts or whether the Police responded to those acts is irrelevant. The law was broken.

    I'm not attacking CAST for being involved in these protests, ( I have taken part in these protests) but I believe that there letter is technically incorrect.

    Just because the FA say you can not do something doesn't make it illegal.
    Quite right. The trouble is it is not the FA saying this but the law of the land as passed by parliament, therefore it is illegal.
    Maybe not snide, I think pompous is a better descriptor for you.
    "Whatever"
  • Goonerhater
    Goonerhater Posts: 12,677
    Prague not surprising EUFA ignored Peter --- vote Out Out June 23rd !!
  • Hartleypete
    Hartleypete Posts: 4,704
    Mametz said:

    Mametz said:


    No, I haven't missed any subtlety. CARD have been repeatedly involved and directing illegal acts. CAST are members of CARD and by being so and indeed remaining so have to accept they have been condoning illegal acts.

    Whether Katrien reported these acts or whether the Police responded to those acts is irrelevant. The law was broken.

    I'm not attacking CAST for being involved in these protests, ( I have taken part in these protests) but I believe that there letter is technically incorrect.

    Just because the FA say you can not do something doesn't make it illegal.
    Quite right. The trouble is it is not the FA saying this but the law of the land as passed by parliament, therefore it is illegal.
    Mametz said:

    Mametz said:


    No, I haven't missed any subtlety. CARD have been repeatedly involved and directing illegal acts. CAST are members of CARD and by being so and indeed remaining so have to accept they have been condoning illegal acts.

    Whether Katrien reported these acts or whether the Police responded to those acts is irrelevant. The law was broken.

    I'm not attacking CAST for being involved in these protests, ( I have taken part in these protests) but I believe that there letter is technically incorrect.

    Just because the FA say you can not do something doesn't make it illegal.
    Quite right. The trouble is it is not the FA saying this but the law of the land as passed by parliament, therefore it is illegal.
    Show me where, the law says missiles not beach balls.
  • Mametz
    Mametz Posts: 1,258
    Hartleypete,

    I quoted the relevant section of the act about halfway down page 2 of this thread. "Missile" in this instance means anything thrown onto or towards the pitch. Under the law, beach balls, stress balls etc would count as missiles.
  • iainment
    iainment Posts: 8,044
    Mametz said:

    iainment said:

    Mametz said:

    Mametz said:


    No, I haven't missed any subtlety. CARD have been repeatedly involved and directing illegal acts. CAST are members of CARD and by being so and indeed remaining so have to accept they have been condoning illegal acts.

    Whether Katrien reported these acts or whether the Police responded to those acts is irrelevant. The law was broken.

    I'm not attacking CAST for being involved in these protests, ( I have taken part in these protests) but I believe that there letter is technically incorrect.

    Just because the FA say you can not do something doesn't make it illegal.
    Quite right. The trouble is it is not the FA saying this but the law of the land as passed by parliament, therefore it is illegal.
    Maybe not snide, I think pompous is a better descriptor for you.
    "Whatever"
    Touche!