Letters From Club - Agreed Behavioural Contracts ????
Comments
-
it doesn't matter that it was a one off and has been allegedly amicably settled, one of the basic freedoms of our democracy is the one of free speech, this letter tries to curtail that freedom.16
-
And has had that support, in private dialogue with the club, and to the extent that the person was accompanied to the meeting.rememberbillybonds said:I assume this is a joke. If not the person who received it needs to have the support of CAST / CARD. The club cannot try to stop criticism by bullying.
34 -
This is absolutely ridiculous.6
-
To think Cliff Eager was a police chief inspector.
Why is he taking orders from Tony Cahones?
Do they never think through what they do?
They talk about social media and then give this out so social media can laugh at them again.
Don't know what this person has said on social media and some of the abuse of the staff has been way over the top and misdirected but if he was so bad then don't sell him a season ticket.
They are so desperate for sales but at the same time Tony Keohane is desperate to look tough in front of his boss like the bully he is.
Eager learning the hard way what a bunch of small minded idiots he's working for.17 -
I think the comment was about Roland's shoes.16
-
If someone's using sexist abuse or threatening language, evidence should have been attached and a ban would be fair enough.
But to haul someone in to sign a contract over "not particularly constructive" comments? Wow.15 -
Maybe the Google cleaning is getting too expensive or time consuming now.4
-
"Dear Colin...."7
-
Agreed Behavioral Contract? How about you run the club correctly and you wouldn't have to do this sort of crap.8
-
Progress. We have obviously been sold to Kim
Jong-Un.........undisclosed.0 - Sponsored links:
-
To Airman Brown. I am pleased to hear that.
I do not know the detail, but bullying by the club must not be allowed.
The way KM has run the club is a disaster. She has made it clear " our " club is not, in her eyes ours. Supporters have been alienated and made to feel they are unwelcome at " their" club.
I feel hurt by all of this. I protest and will continue to do so.
0 -
Would love to know who the person that received this was. I mean we all post pretty negative stuff about the club on social media/on here so for only one of these letters to be sent out, this person must have really hit a nerve.0
-
If it is true then surely the real question is did a breach of the data protection act occur.lancashire lad said:it doesn't matter that it was a one off and has been allegedly amicably settled, one of the basic freedoms of our democracy is the one of free speech, this letter tries to curtail that freedom.
2 -
How?letthegoodtimesroll said:
If it is true then surely the real question is did a breach of the data protection act occur.lancashire lad said:it doesn't matter that it was a one off and has been allegedly amicably settled, one of the basic freedoms of our democracy is the one of free speech, this letter tries to curtail that freedom.
0 -
Move the club to North Korea and be done with it.8
-
This really is a step too far ... getting even closer to the Oyston madness2
-
Kat looks like a squirrel.
Roland wears old shoes.
Keohane looks like a testicle.
Please can I have a meeting now?23 - Sponsored links:
-
Presumably, posting this on Twitter would be considered to be "not particularly constructive".Airman Brown said:My understanding is that there is only one of these letters...
But if, as Airman says, there's only one of these letters then they know who posted this on Twitter.
So, have they forfeited their season ticket?2 -
The media are loving this. Already commented on by: Oliver Kay (Times), Daniel Storey (Guardian), Tony Barrett (Times), Evan Bartlett (Indy) as well as Bleacher Report, Arseblog and ByTheMins22
-
I don't think we need to know who received this, that's clearly a private matter. What would be useful would be to know the nature of the comments that were made, perhaps this was a softer way of trying to get the individual to calm it down a bit if they were running the risk of breaking the law than getting the police involved and/or getting a banning order.Addickforlife said:Would love to know who the person that received this was. I mean we all post pretty negative stuff about the club on social media/on here so for only one of these letters to be sent out, this person must have really hit a nerve.
1 -
The letter is dated 2nd of August, so that makes sense that it's been dealt with already. It makes it a tad curious though - as the guy has posted it like it's only just arrived.Airman Brown said:
And has had that support, in private dialogue with the club, and to the extent that the person was accompanied to the meeting.rememberbillybonds said:I assume this is a joke. If not the person who received it needs to have the support of CAST / CARD. The club cannot try to stop criticism by bullying.
Note: I'm not defending that letter at all, it's pretty much unacceptable and seems to have people understandably riled up. To send that letter over something posted on social media and not expect it to be posted on social media is.. well.. astonishingly misguided.1 -
Only one?Airman Brown said:My understanding is that there is only one of these letters and that the matter has been resolved amicably and without any "contract".
Just seen this and thought it was a wind up.
It is about what is written on 'social media '.
What on earth is the definition of social media?
Who defines derogatory?
If a poster on Charlton Life says something like they think Tony Keohane is incompetent and vindictive are they now one of this new class of criminal?
1 -
Behaviour without a u?Boysie said:Recognise with a "z" ?
2 -
This was sent to Sue Parkes, right?25
-
US English spell check.cherryorchard said:
Behaviour without a u?Boysie said:Recognise with a "z" ?
2 -
Oh damn I knew all my comments about the sofa would come back and bite me4
-
You could understand the club warning season ticket holders about their conduct in the stadium. It would still be ridiculous, but you could at least understand it. But trying to control how fans act outside of the ground, in their own homes is genuine paranoid insane behaviour. Honestly, who comes up with this stuff?? The only thing I'll say for them is they do always manage to surprise; I really didn't see this coming0