Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
The Takeover Thread - Duchatelet Finally Sells (Jan 2020)
Comments
-
Looks like a bit of a duckyChizz said:0 -
Roland’s property targeted by Charlton fans over the weekend. Poor fella5
-
cant condone this, but the silly old fool is messing with people’s lives and appears not to care, so serves him right .3
-
It could have just as easily been his wife, his son, Barbara Windsor, Kenny Everett or Barry Mcguigan but oh no, blame it on the Charlton fans.
Lazy policing, that’s what it is...8 -
While I understand - and share - the anger, frustration, disappointment, etc. which has no doubt led to this action, I think this is counterproductive and cannot support it.
Come on Addicks; surely we have between us the wit and inventiveness to find better ways to protest?
10 -
am I the only one who thinks this is hilarious?12
-
No.Taxi_Lad said:am I the only one who thinks this is hilarious?5 -
FUCK OFF ROLAND...and long may it continue.2
-
Sponsored links:
-
Whoever did this... What an idiot. This is not protesting. That is vandalism. Protesting is one thing. Vandalism is not.11
-
It was journalists, dressed as West ham supporters, pretending to be Millwall fans, masquerading as Charlton fans, when all the time it is Alcorcon supporters who bribed the London journalists to set it all up.0
-
Couldn't happen to a nicer fella!!!1
-
Someone was pretty daring
24 -
I wouldn’t do it, but I’m not surprised someone has. This bloke has been vandalising our football club for five years.Rudders22 said:Whoever did this... What an idiot. This is not protesting. That is vandalism. Protesting is one thing. Vandalism is not.60 -
PreciselyAirman Brown said:
I wouldn’t do it, but I’m not surprised someone has. This bloke has been vandalising our football club for five years.Rudders22 said:Whoever did this... What an idiot. This is not protesting. That is vandalism. Protesting is one thing. Vandalism is not.0 -
Agree, I reckon it was Roderick, angry his old man is pissing away his inheritance on CharltonFumbluff said:It could have just as easily been his wife, his son, Barbara Windsor, Kenny Everett or Barry Mcguigan but oh no, blame it on the Charlton fans.
Lazy policing, that’s what it is...6 -
Spot on Airman.0
-
Should been written in Belgian.....if they have their own language.0
-
Stop attending The Valley is one.N01R4M said:While I understand - and share - the anger, frustration, disappointment, etc. which has no doubt led to this action, I think this is counterproductive and cannot support it.
Come on Addicks; surely we have between us the wit and inventiveness to find better ways to protest?
5 -
Sponsored links:
-
Amazing number of law-abiding Charlton fans condoning criminal action, vandalism of private property and intimidation, all apparently OK because err.. err..we don't like him.
Let's just just hope there's no other people they don't like.
Pathetic.8 -
Perhaps you could issue a public apology to Roland on behalf of all of us law-abiding Charlton fans.grumpyaddick said:Amazing number of law-abiding Charlton fans condoning criminal action, vandalism of private property and intimidation, all apparently OK because err.. err..we don't like him.
Let's just just hope there's no other people they don't like.
Pathetic.
You might even want to pop over to Sint-Truiden to clear it up for him.2 -
Ah yes, let's now stoop beneath Roland's level and support vandalism.
Nice one.
That'll get rid of the old scrote.4 -
Did Keohane get his bonus?
Just asking.
1 -
Incorrect. He may not have been running the club in the way you want, but he owns the club and it is his right to do so.Airman Brown said:
I wouldn’t do it, but I’m not surprised someone has. This bloke has been vandalising our football club for five years.Rudders22 said:Whoever did this... What an idiot. This is not protesting. That is vandalism. Protesting is one thing. Vandalism is not.
Of course we want the bell end out, but vandalising his properties is just one step closer to an entire loss of respect as the media learns of it.3 -
Yes, it might. Who knows??Dazzler21 said:Ah yes, let's now stoop beneath Roland's level and support vandalism.
Nice one.
That'll get rid of the old scrote.1 -
The problem with graffiti is it pisses off everybody who lives and works in the area. Those fans may now find themselves considered as English football hooligans and now when they travel, drink, eat and stay in the area may find they're not so welcome anymore and Roland has gained some local sympathisers.Weegie Addick said:
And what a nice reminder to any prospective buyers of what they can expect if they don’t pump millions into the club and buy instant success
3 -
However before Roland arrived i don't remember any Charlton Graffiti being plastered to this scale.letthegoodtimesroll said:
The problem with graffiti is it pisses off everybody who lives and works in the area. Those fans may now find themselves considered as English football hooligans and now when they travel, drink, eat and stay in the area may find they're not so welcome anymore and Roland has gained some local sympathisers.Weegie Addick said:
And what a nice reminder to any prospective buyers of what they can expect if they don’t pump millions into the club and buy instant success
Since Roland has taken over we have seen a dramatic increase, and it's now gone global
Coincidence? I think not
New, Non-Duchatelet, owner comes in, and graffiti will drop so it's not an issue. :-)
5 -
Desperate actions for desperate times perhaps, but I would have voted against if it had been an option.
Up to now the protests have been well thought out and quite creative, generating almost entirely positive publicity. Suspect this will be used to portray protestors in a bad light.
But as I’ve said before about other issues, it’s not the end of the world, nobody died.
0 -
Roland claiming ‘he has proposals to put to the Charlton fans at the fans forum’, according to Jim White.12
This discussion has been closed.
