The whole club from top to bottom including the fan base is in disarray and at pretty much an all time low with one notable exception.
Why we should expect the players to perform outside of the general malaise I don’t know.
Because they are professionals and are paid good sums of money. When I used to play non league football for no money, I always gave 100 per cent, no matter what the circumstances were. I had pride in my own performance.
I've never 100% understood this and I also think it's very unrealistic.
Whether we like it or not, for many footballers - playing football is just a job. Can we honestly say that that all of us give 100% in our jobs all of the time? Maybe it's because they are doing something that we would all love to do (and the salaries) that our mindset changes slightly.
They are still human, they are still affected by family situations, relationship challenges, media intrusion and a very public assessment of their performance - we can't expect 100% effort all of the time.
#anothertangent
Players are human, but the takeover delay really shouldn't make that much difference to them. Especially this season when there have been no protests AND the players have been well supported (in terms of singing) home and away. Our crowds may be down, but they're still the fourth highest in the division, and higher than Wigan's for example. The majority of the players won't be that bothered at the moment that we have no CEO or Finance Director either.
For fans, the club is for life. For most players, it's a job.
The issue for them is the future, and for those in and out of contract they will want to know if the club has ambition, who the manager will be, who they'll be playing with, etc. I wouldn't blame any of them if their attention is beyond Charlton, just as it would be for any of us if our companies were undergoing am uncertain takeover.
The difference to the players between another season of RD's apathy and one with new owners impatiently looking to get up through the divisions is immeasurable, I'd have thought.
And right now, who do they go to at the club to discuss the details of their concerns? The pie man?
Players these days in lower division clubs have short contracts, they're used to changes of clubs, of managers being sacked etc
The difference between players and us, is that they have scouts watching them. I could be great at my job, but rival companies wouldn't know. Play well for us on Saturday, a watching scout for another club might make a bid
Newcastle have been in limbo all season, with a hated owner and a takeover breaking down, but Rafa has still got them giving 100%.
I replied to Jason Pearce’s tweet the other day about “we go again “ guff Told him that if I performed as inconsistently in my job as our squad, I wouldn’t be in it very long, yes, none of us give 100% every day, but their levels are off the scale at times
Fan in comparing his job to that of a professional footballers shock.
The whole club from top to bottom including the fan base is in disarray and at pretty much an all time low with one notable exception.
Why we should expect the players to perform outside of the general malaise I don’t know.
Because they are professionals and are paid good sums of money. When I used to play non league football for no money, I always gave 100 per cent, no matter what the circumstances were. I had pride in my own performance.
I've never 100% understood this and I also think it's very unrealistic.
Whether we like it or not, for many footballers - playing football is just a job. Can we honestly say that that all of us give 100% in our jobs all of the time? Maybe it's because they are doing something that we would all love to do (and the salaries) that our mindset changes slightly.
They are still human, they are still affected by family situations, relationship challenges, media intrusion and a very public assessment of their performance - we can't expect 100% effort all of the time.
#anothertangent
Players are human, but the takeover delay really shouldn't make that much difference to them. Especially this season when there have been no protests AND the players have been well supported (in terms of singing) home and away. Our crowds may be down, but they're still the fourth highest in the division, and higher than Wigan's for example. The majority of the players won't be that bothered at the moment that we have no CEO or Finance Director either.
For fans, the club is for life. For most players, it's a job.
The issue for them is the future, and for those in and out of contract they will want to know if the club has ambition, who the manager will be, who they'll be playing with, etc. I wouldn't blame any of them if their attention is beyond Charlton, just as it would be for any of us if our companies were undergoing am uncertain takeover.
The difference to the players between another season of RD's apathy and one with new owners impatiently looking to get up through the divisions is immeasurable, I'd have thought.
And right now, who do they go to at the club to discuss the details of their concerns? The pie man?
Players these days in lower division clubs have short contracts, they're used to changes of clubs, of managers being sacked etc
The difference between players and us, is that they have scouts watching them. I could be great at my job, but rival companies wouldn't know. Play well for us on Saturday, a watching scout for another club might make a bid
Newcastle have been in limbo all season, with a hated owner and a takeover breaking down, but Rafa has still got them giving 100%.
They have the motivation of playing and staying in the Premier League. Not quite the same as being lied to season after season as to the ambition of a league one club.
I replied to Jason Pearce’s tweet the other day about “we go again “ guff Told him that if I performed as inconsistently in my job as our squad, I wouldn’t be in it very long, yes, none of us give 100% every day, but their levels are off the scale at times
Fan in comparing his job to that of a professional footballers shock.
I replied to Jason Pearce’s tweet the other day about “we go again “ guff Told him that if I performed as inconsistently in my job as our squad, I wouldn’t be in it very long, yes, none of us give 100% every day, but their levels are off the scale at times
Fan in comparing his job to that of a professional footballers shock.
The whole club from top to bottom including the fan base is in disarray and at pretty much an all time low with one notable exception.
Why we should expect the players to perform outside of the general malaise I don’t know.
Because they are professionals and are paid good sums of money. When I used to play non league football for no money, I always gave 100 per cent, no matter what the circumstances were. I had pride in my own performance.
I've never 100% understood this and I also think it's very unrealistic.
Whether we like it or not, for many footballers - playing football is just a job. Can we honestly say that that all of us give 100% in our jobs all of the time? Maybe it's because they are doing something that we would all love to do (and the salaries) that our mindset changes slightly.
They are still human, they are still affected by family situations, relationship challenges, media intrusion and a very public assessment of their performance - we can't expect 100% effort all of the time.
#anothertangent
Players are human, but the takeover delay really shouldn't make that much difference to them. Especially this season when there have been no protests AND the players have been well supported (in terms of singing) home and away. Our crowds may be down, but they're still the fourth highest in the division, and higher than Wigan's for example. The majority of the players won't be that bothered at the moment that we have no CEO or Finance Director either.
For fans, the club is for life. For most players, it's a job.
The issue for them is the future, and for those in and out of contract they will want to know if the club has ambition, who the manager will be, who they'll be playing with, etc. I wouldn't blame any of them if their attention is beyond Charlton, just as it would be for any of us if our companies were undergoing am uncertain takeover.
The difference to the players between another season of RD's apathy and one with new owners impatiently looking to get up through the divisions is immeasurable, I'd have thought.
And right now, who do they go to at the club to discuss the details of their concerns? The pie man?
Players these days in lower division clubs have short contracts, they're used to changes of clubs, of managers being sacked etc
The difference between players and us, is that they have scouts watching them. I could be great at my job, but rival companies wouldn't know. Play well for us on Saturday, a watching scout for another club might make a bid
Newcastle have been in limbo all season, with a hated owner and a takeover breaking down, but Rafa has still got them giving 100%.
They have the motivation of playing and staying in the Premier League. Not quite the same as being lied to season after season as to the ambition of a league one club.
Surely the only lie about ambition that would affect a player is the signing of other better players to achieve promotion, we can all argue that point, but, as you are paid by the club and are a professional you should perform regardless, I may think others in my Company are worse than me, but it doesn’t stop me performing my job well and having personal professional standards c
I replied to Jason Pearce’s tweet the other day about “we go again “ guff Told him that if I performed as inconsistently in my job as our squad, I wouldn’t be in it very long, yes, none of us give 100% every day, but their levels are off the scale at times
Fan in comparing his job to that of a professional footballers shock.
I work harder
How do you quantify that?
By knowing my own efforts and personal standards each week and then watching our first team, and I reckon over the season I put in more effort in my job than some of our squad do in theirs
I replied to Jason Pearce’s tweet the other day about “we go again “ guff Told him that if I performed as inconsistently in my job as our squad, I wouldn’t be in it very long, yes, none of us give 100% every day, but their levels are off the scale at times
Fan in comparing his job to that of a professional footballers shock.
I work harder
How do you quantify that?
Most of those employed on a full time basis in this country do anywhere between 30-40 hours a week. Footballers do a few hours on the training pitch each day and then 90 minutes on a Saturday.
I retired when I was 55. I worked in the City most of my life. The Company went into Administration when I was 53 and I was paid by the Administrator and the Company to help sort out their affairs. I always gave 100 per cent though.
The whole club from top to bottom including the fan base is in disarray and at pretty much an all time low with one notable exception.
Why we should expect the players to perform outside of the general malaise I don’t know.
Because they are professionals and are paid good sums of money. When I used to play non league football for no money, I always gave 100 per cent, no matter what the circumstances were. I had pride in my own performance.
I've never 100% understood this and I also think it's very unrealistic.
Whether we like it or not, for many footballers - playing football is just a job. Can we honestly say that that all of us give 100% in our jobs all of the time? Maybe it's because they are doing something that we would all love to do (and the salaries) that our mindset changes slightly.
They are still human, they are still affected by family situations, relationship challenges, media intrusion and a very public assessment of their performance - we can't expect 100% effort all of the time.
#anothertangent
I would like to say that Charlton Life is evidence of the fact that we do not all put 100% into our jobs...
I retired when I was 55. I worked in the City most of my life. The Company went into Administration when I was 53 and I was paid by the Administrator and the Company to help sort out their affairs. I always gave 100 per cent though.
I retired when I was 55. I worked in the City most of my life. The Company went into Administration when I was 53 and I was paid by the Administrator and the Company to help sort out their affairs. I always gave 100 per cent though.
I retired when I was 55. I worked in the City most of my life. The Company went into Administration when I was 53 and I was paid by the Administrator and the Company to help sort out their affairs. I always gave 100 per cent though.
You gave 100% yet the company failed.
Can somebody help me out with an analogy here ?
Umm Simon Church? He always gave 100% but was shit.
I retired when I was 55. I worked in the City most of my life. The Company went into Administration when I was 53 and I was paid by the Administrator and the Company to help sort out their affairs. I always gave 100 per cent though.
You gave 100% yet the company failed.
Can somebody help me out with an analogy here ?
Nothing to do with me that the Company failed. More do do with the financial situation in Iceland.
I retired when I was 55. I worked in the City most of my life. The Company went into Administration when I was 53 and I was paid by the Administrator and the Company to help sort out their affairs. I always gave 100 per cent though.
You gave 100% yet the company failed.
Can somebody help me out with an analogy here ?
Nothing to do with me that the Company failed. More do do with the financial situation in Iceland.
You mean they stretched themselves a bit with all those ads with Kerry Katona in ?
I retired when I was 55. I worked in the City most of my life. The Company went into Administration when I was 53 and I was paid by the Administrator and the Company to help sort out their affairs. I always gave 100 per cent though.
You gave 100% yet the company failed.
Can somebody help me out with an analogy here ?
Nothing to do with me that the Company failed. More do do with the financial situation in Iceland.
I retired when I was 55. I worked in the City most of my life. The Company went into Administration when I was 53 and I was paid by the Administrator and the Company to help sort out their affairs. I always gave 100 per cent though.
You gave 100% yet the company failed.
Can somebody help me out with an analogy here ?
Nothing to do with me that the Company failed. More do do with the financial situation in Iceland.
I replied to Jason Pearce’s tweet the other day about “we go again “ guff Told him that if I performed as inconsistently in my job as our squad, I wouldn’t be in it very long, yes, none of us give 100% every day, but their levels are off the scale at times
Fan in comparing his job to that of a professional footballers shock.
I work harder
How do you quantify that?
Most of those employed on a full time basis in this country do anywhere between 30-40 hours a week. Footballers do a few hours on the training pitch each day and then 90 minutes on a Saturday.
Comments
The difference between players and us, is that they have scouts watching them. I could be great at my job, but rival companies wouldn't know. Play well for us on Saturday, a watching scout for another club might make a bid
Newcastle have been in limbo all season, with a hated owner and a takeover breaking down, but Rafa has still got them giving 100%.
Surely the only lie about ambition that would affect a player is the signing of other better players to achieve promotion, we can all argue that point, but, as you are paid by the club and are a professional you should perform regardless, I may think others in my
Company are worse than me, but it doesn’t stop me performing my job well and having personal professional standards c By knowing my own efforts and personal standards each week and then watching our first team, and I reckon over the season I put in more effort in my job than some of our squad do in theirs
Footballers do a few hours on the training pitch each day and then 90 minutes on a Saturday.
You do the math.
Can somebody help me out with an analogy here ?