Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

The General Election - June 8th 2017

15960626465320

Comments

  • seth plum said:

    Addickted said:

    Edit as it's a stupid idea.

    I do find it amazing that the Tories have a run away lead in the opinion polls and seem to be increasing their share of the vote across the board, yet some very valid points are being made as to their failings - yet none of it seems to have the desired effect in changing the views of the 'silent majority' - with the exception of @Fiiish


    Validity is not important any more. Other things seem to drive votes, not detail, but repeated slogans, and what people look like, and the way messages are selected and put across.
    The Tory party, and indeed the Labour party too probably don't need to worry much about the detail of their policies when people don't seem to be guided by them any more.
    What people look like? Are you sure??

    image
  • I might return to the UK with a bang and start up me own party, show em whats what.

    Who's with me?

    I'll look into it.

  • Leuth said:

    Exercise in ideology? What about the Tories, are they not an exercise in ideology?

    If Corbyn had the looks of David Beckham and the gravitas of Obama then he could propose every single policy he is already proposing and SHG would be on board. Fact.

    Tories dont have an ideology. Or at least a core founding ideology. It's the reason they've existed for centuries and been able to adapt.
    Many years ago I took a social sciences course with the OU. The basis of the course was to take four ideologies, (liberalism, social reformism, marxism and conservatism) and apply them to different fields of study. When we got to the summer school we were told in no uncertain terms that whatever it said in the course modules, there is not really any such thing as conservative ideology. The three ideologies that the course was originally based on were liberalism, social reformism and marxism. These are all are well thought out, well researched, and have the necessary explanatory reach and explanatory depth to be considered an ideology. There isn't really a consistent conservative ideology, but they felt they had to include something because of tacit threats to the university's funding from the, then, Conservative government.
  • Addickted said:

    Edit as it's a stupid idea.

    I do find it amazing that the Tories have a run away lead in the opinion polls and seem to be increasing their share of the vote across the board, yet some very valid points are being made as to their failings - yet none of it seems to have the desired effect in changing the views of the 'silent majority' - with the exception of @Fiiish


    I think what we are seeing is our old friend Confirmation Bias at work.

    It doesn't matter that we've had 7 years of austerity that has failed to eliminate the deficit, all our public services systematically being dismantled, 100,000"s public sector jobs going, our health and care system teetering on collapse, our prisons on the point of exploding, our police struggling to cope with fewer and fewer officers, weak if any economic growth, stagnant wages and the rise of zero hours contracts, massive rises in homelessness and people unable to put a meal in front of their children without charit, our armed forces struggling to properly equip fewer personnel and much more.

    None of that matters and it does not have any effect how many charts and graphs or graphics or statistical analysis you back your point up with if the facts don't fit the recipients existing theory. We are conditioned to ignore or denigrate facts that challenge our accepted wisdom.

    We've all got it to one extent or another of course and yes, it does cut the other way too of course.
    So I'm immune from confirmation bias then?
  • The reason is fairly obvious mainly down to one thing, and that is leadership approval ratings - May's is stratospheric, Corbyn's subterranean, until that changes the Tories can and will get away with murder
  • I'm the same. I cannot see how anyone could vote for a party that calls themselves socialists...and are actually proud of that as if socialism is actually a good thing.

    So what makes you think socialism _isn't_ a good thing Nick?

  • Leuth said:

    Exercise in ideology? What about the Tories, are they not an exercise in ideology?

    If Corbyn had the looks of David Beckham and the gravitas of Obama then he could propose every single policy he is already proposing and SHG would be on board. Fact.

    Tories dont have an ideology. Or at least a core founding ideology. It's the reason they've existed for centuries and been able to adapt.
    Centuries?
  • Chizz said:


    Leuth said:

    Exercise in ideology? What about the Tories, are they not an exercise in ideology?

    If Corbyn had the looks of David Beckham and the gravitas of Obama then he could propose every single policy he is already proposing and SHG would be on board. Fact.

    Tories dont have an ideology. Or at least a core founding ideology. It's the reason they've existed for centuries and been able to adapt.
    Centuries?
    They have a lot in common with Henry VIII
  • Sponsored links:


  • edited May 2017
    Chizz said:


    Leuth said:

    Exercise in ideology? What about the Tories, are they not an exercise in ideology?

    If Corbyn had the looks of David Beckham and the gravitas of Obama then he could propose every single policy he is already proposing and SHG would be on board. Fact.

    Tories dont have an ideology. Or at least a core founding ideology. It's the reason they've existed for centuries and been able to adapt.
    Centuries?
    Well, the Whigs and Tories were around in the Seventeenth Century - Tory, interestingly enough (or perhaps not), was originally a term of abuse, derived from a term for an Irish highwayman (along with Rapparee, which is a word that I prefer).
  • Chizz said:


    Leuth said:

    Exercise in ideology? What about the Tories, are they not an exercise in ideology?

    If Corbyn had the looks of David Beckham and the gravitas of Obama then he could propose every single policy he is already proposing and SHG would be on board. Fact.

    Tories dont have an ideology. Or at least a core founding ideology. It's the reason they've existed for centuries and been able to adapt.
    Centuries?
    Well, the Whigs and Tories were around in the Seventeenth Century - Tory, interestingly enough (or perhaps not), was originally a term of abuse, derived from a term for an Irish highwayman (along with Rapparee, which is a word that I prefer).
    If the cap fits...
  • bobmunro said:

    I might return to the UK with a bang and start up me own party, show em whats what.

    Who's with me?

    Colin
    Who the fucks Colin when hes at home? Is he proper militant who dont give two shits? Coz if he is, hes in and he can be my minister for education.

    Anyone else?
    A question that has often been asked but never satisfactorily answered.
    Colin Sams aka bexleyboy, who seems to live in an alternative reality.
  • Excellent piece by Andrew rawnsley today
  • Excellent piece by Andrew rawnsley today

    Agree. But then you read the comments below it and find the Corbynistas in complete denial.

  • I have read this once. Need to read it again to fully grasp what it means. The observations are absolutely terrifying.

    https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/may/07/the-great-british-brexit-robbery-hijacked-democracy
  • edited May 2017

    Addickted said:

    Edit as it's a stupid idea.

    I do find it amazing that the Tories have a run away lead in the opinion polls and seem to be increasing their share of the vote across the board, yet some very valid points are being made as to their failings - yet none of it seems to have the desired effect in changing the views of the 'silent majority' - with the exception of @Fiiish


    I think what we are seeing is our old friend Confirmation Bias at work.

    It doesn't matter that we've had 7 years of austerity that has failed to eliminate the deficit, all our public services systematically being dismantled, 100,000"s public sector jobs going, our health and care system teetering on collapse, our prisons on the point of exploding, our police struggling to cope with fewer and fewer officers, weak if any economic growth, stagnant wages and the rise of zero hours contracts, massive rises in homelessness and people unable to put a meal in front of their children without charit, our armed forces struggling to properly equip fewer personnel and much more.

    None of that matters and it does not have any effect how many charts and graphs or graphics or statistical analysis you back your point up with if the facts don't fit the recipients existing theory. We are conditioned to ignore or denigrate facts that challenge our accepted wisdom.

    We've all got it to one extent or another of course and yes, it does cut the other way too of course.
    What will it take though? What will the breaking point be where common sense overrides confirmation bias?

    Governments need to change. In my memory there has been Major to Blair and Brown to Cameron. Major by comparison to May was an incredibly competent administrator, certainly not a sociopath hellbent on imposing her idyllic 1950s Oxfordshire village, WI & grammar school fantasy on the rest of the country.

    So what will it be for our voters to realise what a fucking disaster this lot of Tories are? How many more A&E departments need to fail? How many more schools need to descend into chaos? How many more poor, disabled and homeless need to die unnecessarily? How many more crimes? How much more corruption?

    I feel that social media is partly to blame. The echo chamber mentality and the fact that people rarely discuss politics face-to-face anymore means people become more resilient to facts that challenge their views and instead only imbibe opinions and mantras that reinforce their beliefs. This does go both ways for both Labour and Tories, and indeed for pro and anti Corbyn Labour voters as well.
  • I have read this once. Need to read it again to fully grasp what it means. The observations are absolutely terrifying.

    https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/may/07/the-great-british-brexit-robbery-hijacked-democracy

    That's certainly a conspiracy theory and a half.

    Far too much to grasp in one read but initial thoughts are that some of the 'links' are rather tenuous. Fascinating read though.
  • aliwibble said:

    I'm the same. I cannot see how anyone could vote for a party that calls themselves socialists...and are actually proud of that as if socialism is actually a good thing.

    So what makes you think socialism _isn't_ a good thing Nick?
    I've been asking this question to anyone who disagrees with socialism, I'm yet to have a single reply...
  • edited May 2017

    aliwibble said:

    I'm the same. I cannot see how anyone could vote for a party that calls themselves socialists...and are actually proud of that as if socialism is actually a good thing.

    So what makes you think socialism _isn't_ a good thing Nick?
    I've been asking this question to anyone who disagrees with socialism, I'm yet to have a single reply...
    Well, it honestly depends on what you mean by socialism? Some socialist ideas are good when implemented into a capitalist system. That doesn't mean that all out socialism would be great, just like all out capitalism is not great.

    I'd just say that i don't believe our system of government should be tied rigidly to an ideology that was created 200 odd years ago by an average philosopher. Any ideology is doomed to fail with the passing of time and needs to be adapted.
  • Sponsored links:


  • aliwibble said:

    I'm the same. I cannot see how anyone could vote for a party that calls themselves socialists...and are actually proud of that as if socialism is actually a good thing.

    So what makes you think socialism _isn't_ a good thing Nick?
    USSR
    Cuba
    Venezuela
    Chezchoslovakia
    East Germany
    Hungary
    Poland
    Albania
    North Korea
    China
    Romania
    Etc


    All communist, surely? Bit of a difference.
  • I have read this once. Need to read it again to fully grasp what it means. The observations are absolutely terrifying.

    https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/may/07/the-great-british-brexit-robbery-hijacked-democracy

    Everyone should read this
  • The bit about the flesh eating aliens and city sized flying saucers was the best bit!
  • I remember someone (Red_in_SE8 ?) suggesting that the troll whose name I can't remember who immediately vanished from this site post referendum was a paid employee of some leave supporting group. I thought at the time it was fanciful but I wonder.

    Was this vibrant and lively forum discussion picked up by online data scanning and targeted ?

    Charlton 1969, I think.

    Very odd intervention, wasn't it?

    I've got my doubts about the motives of another regular visitor, but cannot prove anything. Knowing what I know about Russian backed intervention in Czech social media - it is far more brazen than in the UK - I think we are right to be watchful.


    You had him sussed fairly early on @PragueAddick. However, he did sometimes post the occasional gem amongst the piles of dross.

    Spill the beans on who else you believe is a plant?

This discussion has been closed.

Roland Out Forever!