The Ashes 2017-18
Comments
-
251-6, Malan out to Starc, a brilliant catch by Smith0
-
Curran looks to have a bit about him, if not the outrageous talent of his brother1
-
A bit of luck too, as Cummins drops a sitter off Lyon!Leuth said:Curran looks to have a bit about him, if not the outrageous talent of his brother
0 -
Hazlewood drops an even bigger sitter off Cummins. Moeen survives. Head back on pal0
-
A worldy catch by Smith followed by Panesar/Tufnell levels of fielding!Leuth said:Hazlewood drops an even bigger sitter off Cummins. Moeen survives. Head back on pal
0 -
Decent little partnership.
288-6 after 100 overs and the drinks break.
Ali 25*
Curran 22*0 -
"sweaty" coming in peace, what do the numbers on the English shirts represent?0
-
Amazing that such things happen at Test level, especially the Hazlewood one. He looked like he closed his eyes for a dare and tried to guess where the ball was.0
-
Sorry @addickson. The real answer is the individual player's number in the all time list of England test players, ordered by their debut match. Alastair Cook is 630 and the debutant Mason Crane will appear soon with 683.1
-
Sponsored links:
-
300 up, 300/70
-
Frustrated here, i have sky but not BT. Anyone have an idea what a par score is for our first innings. 400 ?0
-
Average score for a first innings in Sydney is 313 I believe but probably higher in recent years.Addictedoldgit said:Frustrated here, i have sky but not BT. Anyone have an idea what a par score is for our first innings. 400 ?
0 -
Nobody picked a score between 322 and 366! It'll be 344 now obv haha0
-
Great entertainment here.0
-
350 is the recent par scoreAddictedoldgit said:Frustrated here, i have sky but not BT. Anyone have an idea what a par score is for our first innings. 400 ?
Runs coming at a quick rate as Broad smacks the short pitched bowling around!0 -
335-8
Curran gone to a Cummins short ball for 39.0 -
Curran goes for an impressive 39, he was impressive2
-
Cheers @AshBurtonAshBurton said:Sorry @addickson. The real answer is the individual player's number in the all time list of England test players, ordered by their debut match. Alastair Cook is 630 and the debutant Mason Crane will appear soon with 683.
Wondered why the Aussies were having so much trouble putting away the 60th England XI
Is this a new fad, or have England always worn test numbers?
As a wee boy watching 50-over cricket on a Sunday afternoon, Derek Underwood was one of my first sporting heroes, but cricket was never played at school and I never pursued what would have been a pretty niche interest up here.
Will have to try and get to an early season game at The Valley so that I can take in a cricket match too1 -
Sponsored links:
-
Sorry what was he and his innings? :-)killerandflash said:Curran goes for an impressive 39, he was impressive
3 -
Surrey rubbishCallumcafc said:
Sorry what was he and his innings? :-)killerandflash said:Curran goes for an impressive 39, he was impressive
2 -
I think it's a fairly new thing but couldn't say when these numbers first appeared.addickson said:
Cheers @AshBurtonAshBurton said:Sorry @addickson. The real answer is the individual player's number in the all time list of England test players, ordered by their debut match. Alastair Cook is 630 and the debutant Mason Crane will appear soon with 683.
Wondered why the Aussies were having so much trouble putting away the 60th England XI
Is this a new fad, or have England always worn test numbers?
As a wee boy watching 50-over cricket on a Sunday afternoon, Derek Underwood was one of my first sporting heroes, but cricket was never played at school and I never pursued what would have been a pretty niche interest up here.
Will have to try and get to an early season game at The Valley so that I can take in a cricket match too
Deadly Derek was also one of my first heroes. In fact, most of my childhood heroes were called Derek. I hadn't realised before but it's clearly a big modern-day problem - too few Dereks.
5 -
346-9
Broad gone for 31 to Lyon.0 -
Looks like a disaster run out from 10 & 11 there.
346 all out.0 -
Crane run out, all out for 3460
-
Cheers @AshBurton - that deserves a LOL as well as a Like.AshBurton said:
I think it's a fairly new thing but couldn't say when these numbers first appeared.addickson said:
Cheers @AshBurtonAshBurton said:Sorry @addickson. The real answer is the individual player's number in the all time list of England test players, ordered by their debut match. Alastair Cook is 630 and the debutant Mason Crane will appear soon with 683.
Wondered why the Aussies were having so much trouble putting away the 60th England XI
Is this a new fad, or have England always worn test numbers?
As a wee boy watching 50-over cricket on a Sunday afternoon, Derek Underwood was one of my first sporting heroes, but cricket was never played at school and I never pursued what would have been a pretty niche interest up here.
Will have to try and get to an early season game at The Valley so that I can take in a cricket match too
Deadly Derek was also one of my first heroes. In fact, most of my childhood heroes were called Derek. I hadn't realised before but it's clearly a big modern-day problem - too few Dereks.
Anyway, every time I post on here England lose a wicket(s) so I guess my work on here is done 1 -
You kidding? We need all your wicket-taking powers now!1
-
Bancroft bowled for a duck by Broad!!
1-11
