I reckon it will all be over by this evening. Our batsmen are like rabbits caught in the headlights at the moment. ffs, Its Nathan Lyon, not Shane Warne, Get down the track & knock him off his stride - ping a few back over his head or sweep it, don't just stand there and prod at the bl***y thing.
I’m up watching, phone on charge so wasn’t on here. Just had a cheese toastee and staying sat upright so I don’t wake up on sofa at 5am again although I.m fearful our innings won’t last much past tea.....
Only decent thing that came out of that session was the scoring rate - 3.19 per over. We need more of that, but sadly I still feel we'll give them less than 180 to chase and they're knock them off with wickets to spare.
If Stokes is free to join the team, I'd have him in for Ball, but would Moeen go back to number 8? I guess a lot depends on how he goes today. Quite enjoy the idea of putting Bairstow at 8 and telling him to play his shots
Vaughan and Ponting making the point that the line is thicker towards the middle and if the width of the line was consistent, Ali might well have been in.
Vaughan and Ponting making the point that the line is thicker towards the middle and if the width of the line was consistent, Ali might well have been in.
Comments
Is a lead of 180 really good enough? We'd need Anderson or Broad to rip through three, four, five wickets very quickly.
http://sevenoaksvine.play-cricket.com/website/results/835123
Vaughan and Ponting making the point that the line is thicker towards the middle and if the width of the line was consistent, Ali might well have been in.
185-7, lead by 159.
Bairstow gone for 42. Stupid stupid shot.
194-8, lead by 168. Broad, Ball and Anderson left.
194-8 and ahead by 168
They set plan after plan for us, we bought every one; Bairstow the latest.