Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Lyle Taylor - signed for Colchester (p284)

1109110112114115291

Comments

  • Bowyer sounds annoyed in that interview 
    I don't blame him! Like others have said would he have sat out April and May in a normal season. He's paiid to play football albeit up until the end of June. Should not be training with us or being paid if he aint going play
    Doesnt he have the right to be training seeing we're his latest club?

    Only say that because Roger Johnson was allowed to train @ Sparrows Lane before he joined Bromley when out of contract
    I doubt that we could be forced to let him use the facilities if he has been released for breach of contract and as he is still our player we could just suspend him from the training ground for breach of contract.

    if he has downed tools he shouldn’t be allowed to travel in, mix with others and use the gym anyway, there is still a very real health threat out there.
  • cafctom said:
    It always seemed to me that the Montserrat stuff was just a glorified holiday whenever it came up. I’m sure he was proud to represent them but it does wind me up that he was prepared to risk getting injured for them but not for us when he is contracted to keep playing.
    So, was it a glorified holiday or was he proud to represent them, which was it? 
  • edited June 2020
    .
  • JamesSeed said:
    99% of us would do exactly the same as Lyle's doing, were we in the same situation. It’s a profession after all. 
    Still gutted though. 
    Surely the simple fact that 99% of our out of contract players haven't done the same, shows what you're saying to be incorrect?
    No, it doesn't.
    99% of our out of contract players are not in the same position as Lyle. They may be hoping to have their contracts extended at Charlton. They certainly don't have the same options as Lyle and their motives/reasons for agreeing to play will, most certainly, be different. 
  • edited June 2020
    JamesSeed said:
    99% of us would do exactly the same as Lyle's doing, were we in the same situation. It’s a profession after all. 
    Still gutted though. 
    I for one would not do what he is doing. He has probably cost us a takeover as well as we go into the last 9 games without our top player so relegation looks more of a possibility and who would buy us now. The club could tadke a policy for the last 9 games to cover an career ending injury? 10 mil or so? how much would that cost ?
  • edited June 2020
    cafctom said:
    It always seemed to me that the Montserrat stuff was just a glorified holiday whenever it came up. I’m sure he was proud to represent them but it does wind me up that he was prepared to risk getting injured for them but not for us when he is contracted to keep playing.
    So, was it a glorified holiday or was he proud to represent them, which was it? 
    No idea to be honest - probably both. I wouldn’t call games against Saint Lucia and Aruba matches that are worth getting injured in though. And if you are going to get injured in them then don’t pull this stunt right when the team needs you and the clubs survival is on the line. 

    Deep down I do think Lyle’s a decent bloke but his decision making over the course of the past season does leave a lot to be desired. And not just the football side of it, cos he gives everything when he is out there - but the attention seeking, the need to be front and centre. 

    If youre good enough then then you can get away with being a bit different in that sense, but don’t let your team mates and fans down like this
  • Sponsored links:


  • Stig said:
    There's something else about this contract situation that I think pushes the decision to leave. A normal season which finished at the end of April would give any player getting hurt two months to recover. Sure, every now and then some poor sod will pick up a career ending injury, but the chances are mercifully small. The vast majority of players injured at the end of the season will be fit by the time their contracts are up. This time around the games are so close to the end of the contract period that even a minor injury could put a player out of action when the transfer window is open. For a player who had a nice deal lined up this season is far riskier, because even a relatively simple injury could delay a move leaving potential suitors to look around for alternatives. No-one is going to want to fail a medical and then sweat it out hoping the buyers bide their time, because the chances are they won't. This, combined with the fact that we don't even know what's going to happen with next season, means that it's full of uncertainty. Indeed practically the only certainty is that however this season finishes, Charlton will still be a nut house - and the biggest doubt about that is whether the club will actually exist. To be a 30 year old player with one last throw of the career-dice left, sticking around would be utter madness and doing something that could jeopardise a move would be very risky indeed.
    My god, the voice of reason. The important question though is will you boo or clap him if we are ever lucky enough to play against him in the future? 
  • Stig said:
    There's something else about this contract situation that I think pushes the decision to leave. A normal season which finished at the end of April would give any player getting hurt two months to recover. Sure, every now and then some poor sod will pick up a career ending injury, but the chances are mercifully small. The vast majority of players injured at the end of the season will be fit by the time their contracts are up. This time around the games are so close to the end of the contract period that even a minor injury could put a player out of action when the transfer window is open. For a player who had a nice deal lined up this season is far riskier, because even a relatively simple injury could delay a move leaving potential suitors to look around for alternatives. No-one is going to want to fail a medical and then sweat it out hoping the buyers bide their time, because the chances are they won't. This, combined with the fact that we don't even know what's going to happen with next season, means that it's full of uncertainty. Indeed practically the only certainty is that however this season finishes, Charlton will still be a nut house - and the biggest doubt about that is whether the club will actually exist. To be a 30 year old player with one last throw of the career-dice left, sticking around would be utter madness and doing something that could jeopardise a move would be very risky indeed.
    Speaking as a neutral, without any emotional attachment, I think you’re bang on with this post. 
  • Stig said:
    There's something else about this contract situation that I think pushes the decision to leave. A normal season which finished at the end of April would give any player getting hurt two months to recover. Sure, every now and then some poor sod will pick up a career ending injury, but the chances are mercifully small. The vast majority of players injured at the end of the season will be fit by the time their contracts are up. This time around the games are so close to the end of the contract period that even a minor injury could put a player out of action when the transfer window is open. For a player who had a nice deal lined up this season is far riskier, because even a relatively simple injury could delay a move leaving potential suitors to look around for alternatives. No-one is going to want to fail a medical and then sweat it out hoping the buyers bide their time, because the chances are they won't. This, combined with the fact that we don't even know what's going to happen with next season, means that it's full of uncertainty. Indeed practically the only certainty is that however this season finishes, Charlton will still be a nut house - and the biggest doubt about that is whether the club will actually exist. To be a 30 year old player with one last throw of the career-dice left, sticking around would be utter madness and doing something that could jeopardise a move would be very risky indeed.
    Speaking as a neutral, without any emotional attachment, I think you’re bang on with this post. 
    Are you sure that you are a Millwall fan? Far too sensible. 
  • Slightly surprised considering how he performed after the Brentford move was blocked, he was a model pro then. I did wonder if there was an ulterior motive with the interviews he's been doing, letting people know he's available, but the truth is any move has probably already been fixed up. It's pretty poor on his part, there are plenty of players who move on at the end of the season and keep up their standards up, never mind taking the trouble to turn up every week. It’s part of being a professional.
  • Stig said:
    There's something else about this contract situation that I think pushes the decision to leave. A normal season which finished at the end of April would give any player getting hurt two months to recover. Sure, every now and then some poor sod will pick up a career ending injury, but the chances are mercifully small. The vast majority of players injured at the end of the season will be fit by the time their contracts are up. This time around the games are so close to the end of the contract period that even a minor injury could put a player out of action when the transfer window is open. For a player who had a nice deal lined up this season is far riskier, because even a relatively simple injury could delay a move leaving potential suitors to look around for alternatives. No-one is going to want to fail a medical and then sweat it out hoping the buyers bide their time, because the chances are they won't. This, combined with the fact that we don't even know what's going to happen with next season, means that it's full of uncertainty. Indeed practically the only certainty is that however this season finishes, Charlton will still be a nut house - and the biggest doubt about that is whether the club will actually exist. To be a 30 year old player with one last throw of the career-dice left, sticking around would be utter madness and doing something that could jeopardise a move would be very risky indeed.
    Speaking as a neutral, without any emotional attachment, I think you’re bang on with this post. 
    Appreciate the end of June is 4 - 6 weeks later so less time to recover from any injury. But his contract is as a footballer which necessitates playing football! Also, if he does go to Rangers then their season starts earlier so the difference between the time of the play offs and the end of June and the start of the next season is then less so not much difference in recovery time. He would have been happy to be be paid for June whilst not playing
  • Apologies if this has already been said as I'm too annoyed to read all the comments but just as well Patrick Bauer didn't decide to skip the play-offs last season, eh?
    But if he hadn't have scored in the 94th minute would he just be seen as another Judas? 
  • Slightly surprised considering how he performed after the Brentford move was blocked, he was a model pro then. I did wonder if there was an ulterior motive with the interviews he's been doing, letting people know he's available, but the truth is any move has probably already been fixed up. It's pretty poor on his part, there are plenty of players who move on at the end of the season and keep up their standards up, never mind taking the trouble to turn up every week. It’s part of being a professional.
    But this season end is totally different to any other season end. 
  • cafctom said:
    Apologies if this has already been said as I'm too annoyed to read all the comments but just as well Patrick Bauer didn't decide to skip the play-offs last season, eh?
    But if he hadn't have scored in the 94th minute would he just be seen as another Judas? 
    Yes probably. 

    But he did turn up, and he was professional. That’s the difference!
    No, it is completely different and at the end of a normal season and not under the current crazy conditions.
    If he hadn't have been the goal-scoring hero then many on here would just see him as a money-grabbing foreigner not a hero. 
  • Sponsored links:


  • Footballers are privileged individuals fulfilling dreams that 1000s of kids would love to and are paid well to do just that. No he might not be on 20k a week, but I'm sure he earns a lot more than most of us. He should honor his contract in what is a very unusual situation. Even if that means playing upto 30th June. I'm genuinely dissapointed with him, I think he has really let himself and us fans down
  • Honesty doesn’t pay , he should have coasted the 2-3 games till the end of June ....



    And left a hero









    then taken shit for not seeing out the rest of the season 
  • edited June 2020
    cafctom said:
    Apologies if this has already been said as I'm too annoyed to read all the comments but just as well Patrick Bauer didn't decide to skip the play-offs last season, eh?
    But if he hadn't have scored in the 94th minute would he just be seen as another Judas? 
    Yes probably. 

    But he did turn up, and he was professional. That’s the difference!
    No, it is completely different and at the end of a normal season and not under the current crazy conditions.
    If he hadn't have been the goal-scoring hero then many on here would just see him as a money-grabbing foreigner not a hero. 
    He is contracted as a football player at Charlton until the end of June not until the time of the last game of a normal season. Not expecting anyone to play beyond their current contract, unless it gets extended. Unless of course his contract is worded that he doesn't need to play in June (as ordinarily it woud be expected the last game would be in May - maybe there is something in the wording that refers to June differently, as no one would have expected the last game not to be in May (which would mean he isn't in breach)? Is there a reason the contract is until the end of June despite them expecting the last game to be in May?

    Not sure if comparable to a teacher leaving a school at the end of school year. When someone I know changed schools they were paid by the school they were leaving until the end of August even though they had finished teaching there. I forget teh exct dates but it was certainly weeks after the end fo the school year. On that note, how do schools/teachers stand if they are asked to work during the time of the usual school holidays this year (so children can catch up) as they are paid by the school but wouldn't ordinarily work? Will they get overtime, as despite being paid, they are due the 6(?) week break after all the hours they have done throught the school year?
  • CAFCDAZ said:
    Footballers are privileged individuals fulfilling dreams that 1000s of kids would love to and are paid well to do just that. No he might not be on 20k a week, but I'm sure he earns a lot more than most of us. He should honor his contract in what is a very unusual situation. Even if that means playing upto 30th June. I'm genuinely dissapointed with him, I think he has really let himself and us fans down
    I'm sure that your disappointment will keep him awake at night.
    As a professional footballer he has a limited time to earn money. He is now at a crucial time in his career where he can obtain a contract that will secure his future.
    His affiliation with Charlton is less than two years. Ours, as fans, may be 10/20/30/40/50/60 years. Is it any wonder that he may see things differently? 
    I really think that people should get some perspective. I, as a Charlton fan of many years, do not want to see us relegated, but I can fully understand why Lyle does not want to risk his future in these exceptional circumstances. If the future had been concluded under normal circumstances then I have no doubt that Lyle would have been busting a gut, as he had in every other game, to secure our survival. 


  • cafctom said:
    Apologies if this has already been said as I'm too annoyed to read all the comments but just as well Patrick Bauer didn't decide to skip the play-offs last season, eh?
    But if he hadn't have scored in the 94th minute would he just be seen as another Judas? 
    Yes probably. 

    But he did turn up, and he was professional. That’s the difference!
    No, it is completely different and at the end of a normal season and not under the current crazy conditions.
    If he hadn't have been the goal-scoring hero then many on here would just see him as a money-grabbing foreigner not a hero. 
    He is contracted as a football player at Charlton until the end of June not until the time of the last game of a normal season. Not expecting anyone to play beyond their current contract, unless it gets extended. Unless of course his contract is worded that he doesn't need to play in June (as ordinarily it woud be expected the last game would be in May - maybe there is something in the wording that refers to June differently, as no one would have expected the last game not to be in May (which would mean he isn't in breach)? Is there a reason the contract is until the end of June despite them expecting the last game to be in May?

    Not sure if comparable to a teacher leaving a school at the end of school year. When someone I know changed schools they were paid by the school they were leaving until the end of August even though they had finished teaching there. I forget teh exct dates but it was certainly weeks after the end fo the school year. On that note, how do schools/teachers stand if they are asked to work during the time of the usual school holidays this year (so children can catch up) as they are paid by the school but wouldn't ordinarily work? Will they get overtime, as despite being paid, they are due the 6(?) week break after all the hours they have done throught the school year?
    What teachers do or don't do is irrelevant.

    Yes he is contracted until the end of June but can you tell me about a previous season when that has included playing club matches until the end of June or beyond? Or even beyond May? 

    The June 30th date is clearly a date of convenience for both player and club and has never been used as a club playing date but merely a date after which registrations can be transferred. 
  • Stig said:
    There's something else about this contract situation that I think pushes the decision to leave. A normal season which finished at the end of April would give any player getting hurt two months to recover. Sure, every now and then some poor sod will pick up a career ending injury, but the chances are mercifully small. The vast majority of players injured at the end of the season will be fit by the time their contracts are up. This time around the games are so close to the end of the contract period that even a minor injury could put a player out of action when the transfer window is open. For a player who had a nice deal lined up this season is far riskier, because even a relatively simple injury could delay a move leaving potential suitors to look around for alternatives. No-one is going to want to fail a medical and then sweat it out hoping the buyers bide their time, because the chances are they won't. This, combined with the fact that we don't even know what's going to happen with next season, means that it's full of uncertainty. Indeed practically the only certainty is that however this season finishes, Charlton will still be a nut house - and the biggest doubt about that is whether the club will actually exist. To be a 30 year old player with one last throw of the career-dice left, sticking around would be utter madness and doing something that could jeopardise a move would be very risky indeed.
    Man Utd waited a year to sign Van Nistelrooy. If Taylor thinks he's that good then Rangers/Fulham/ Blyth Spartans would surely wait until he was fit again.......
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!