Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

New kit and sponsor (P108, 2021 new 3rd kit)

12223252728138

Comments

  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 63,748
    Love it - pinstripe has been rumoured for a while so not sure what people were expecting?
  • cafcsinger
    cafcsinger Posts: 5,548
    Oh dear. Horrible pinstripe. 2/10
  • roseandcrown
    roseandcrown Posts: 7,587
    not great for me but. 
  • AllHailTheHen
    AllHailTheHen Posts: 3,063
    edited July 2019
    Not sure I like the black sponsors name or Hummel logo. Doesn't quite look right but guess limited in what they could do with the white pin stripes. Jury is out on this for me
  • Ross
    Ross Posts: 4,408
    Ross said:

    If only the ITRM was in the place as in this leak
  • The Red Robin
    The Red Robin Posts: 26,126
    not great for me but. 

  • Sillybilly
    Sillybilly Posts: 9,234
    Don’t like it to be honest. Pin stripes are too prominent, sponsor logo in black looks wrong and the socks are ghastly. Big white tops on socks make players look clumsy. Last seasons socks with this and it would have been passable but on the whole it’s not doing it for me. Sorry. 
  • cafc999
    cafc999 Posts: 4,967
    One of the comments I gave Hummel was that if they was going to go with pinstripes then they should be exactly that.

    The sponsor logo is not quite visible enough but as it was a last minute change I can see why especially as the mock up shirt had Betdaq on it.

    All home shirts are going to have that marmite effect and at the end of the day we have a bespoke kit
  • FishCostaFortune
    FishCostaFortune Posts: 10,773
    Ross said:
    Ross said:

    If only the ITRM was in the place as in this leak
    I know its a fuzzy designed image, but I feel the kit looks better here than it does in the reveal. I think it is because the reveal sponsor logo, all be it a fantastic cause, looks a bit naff to me. One to see in person first.
  • Sponsored links:



  • roseandcrown
    roseandcrown Posts: 7,587
    not great for me but. 

    As Russell said to the palace fan, patience.  
  • carly burn
    carly burn Posts: 19,453
    cafc999 said:
    One of the comments I gave Hummel was that if they was going to go with pinstripes then they should be exactly that.

    The sponsor logo is not quite visible enough but as it was a last minute change I can see why especially as the mock up shirt had Betdaq on it.

    All home shirts are going to have that marmite effect and at the end of the day we have a bespoke kit
      So it's your fault?
  • Croydon
    Croydon Posts: 12,723
    Horrible placement of the ITRM logo.

    I'm not a huge fan but I won't be wearing it anyway so not that fussed. It's red with white shorts, job done.
  • cafc999
    cafc999 Posts: 4,967
    cafc999 said:
    One of the comments I gave Hummel was that if they was going to go with pinstripes then they should be exactly that.

    The sponsor logo is not quite visible enough but as it was a last minute change I can see why especially as the mock up shirt had Betdaq on it.

    All home shirts are going to have that marmite effect and at the end of the day we have a bespoke kit
      So it's your fault?
    If they would have listened to me then everyone would have hated the shirt ;) 
  • Shirt looks great, Sponsor being a charity is excellent, not sure the logo quite works on the shirt but a decent effort and way better than a Nike template
  • CAFCsayer
    CAFCsayer Posts: 10,222
    Really nice kit, but a bit Southampton for me... Pin-stripes should be smaller
  • Refunding my season ticket
  • LargeAddick
    LargeAddick Posts: 32,552
    not keen on that at all
  • Valley11
    Valley11 Posts: 11,982
    Not a huge fan but it's ok

  • stackitsteve
    stackitsteve Posts: 12,102
    Initial reaction is I don’t like it but I don’t know why.
    fully expect to love it by the weekend.
  • Sponsored links:



  • Don't like it, looks like an Orient or Bristol city shirt.

    But seeing as i haven't bought a Charlton shirt for about 20 years i'll not let it trouble me too much.
  • Red_in_SE8
    Red_in_SE8 Posts: 5,961
    I like the fact the sponsor logo is so subtle and in black. So many modern football kits these days are ruined by garish sponsor logos.
  • The perfect shirt for a day out at Wembley again next May 
  • charlton_hero
    charlton_hero Posts: 4,664
    I'm not a fan, it looks like its been designed on Pro Evo.
  • The Red Robin
    The Red Robin Posts: 26,126
    I'm not a fan, it looks like its been designed on Pro Evo.
    South East London Reds.
  • StigThundercock
    StigThundercock Posts: 3,722
    edited July 2019
    I'm suprised no one has mentioned the price of the shirt with it being priced at £50. Seems expensive to me. Hummel don't seem to have one set price for clubs who sell their shirts either. Coventry charge £47, Cambridge £42, Middlesborough £48 and Rangers £60 :o

    But maybe Hummel aren't that pricey, as Arsenal's new home shirt is £60 and Chelsea are charging just under £65 for theirs.
    with the single figures of sales they're gonna achieve, they've gone for maximising the revenue
    £45 is obscene
    Don't anybody bleat on about "that's roughly what everybody charges" - that's a 100% polyester t-shirt, materials costs under £1, machine made and drenched in sponsorship logos.  Even without a loathsome toxic arsehole owning the club, ponying up £50 requires a massive dose of self-delusion.
    As soon as the twunt is gone - steam in, scoop them up, it's your overdraft; until then NOT A PENNY.
  • WSA
    WSA Posts: 1,911
    :) Very smart
  • Braziliance
    Braziliance Posts: 8,342
    I love it, best looking kit in God knows how long
  • KBslittlesis
    KBslittlesis Posts: 8,582
    The perfect shirt for a day out at Wembley again next May 
    No!
    That can’t happen. 
    I’m at KB’s sons wife to be hen in Bournemouth!
    Has to be automatic :smile: