New home shirt is a mess, too many ideas very poorly and hastily cobbled together sponsor's logo very hard to make out black on red, I know it's their logo but the wording's too small on that background pinstripe looks like a middlesboro 70's throwback chest and sleeves look like different shades of red, poxy fiddly black bits of trim look like a man u misprint position of the gold sword thing above the back of shirt sponsor is a clumsy afterthought - if the sword thing is to work at all (one bit of gold on all that red white n black?) then the ITRM has to be under the numbers - or what about gold numbers with a superimposed sword symbol effect? I suspect too much interference from too many uncoordinated bunglers ending up with incompatible contractual obligations - classic twunt twattery. Love the hummel logo - can't see how it's a bee but like it all the same. In stark stark contrast the white shorts are simple, coordinated, uncluttered, a whole different class to the shirt. Chevrons on the front, of the otherwise decent socks, look really odd. Entirely academic until the toxic tosspot is consigned to history. CAFC kit only to be worn by those contractually obliged, lickspittles, simpletons and collaborators in the club's drawn out demise.
New home shirt is a mess, too many ideas very poorly and hastily cobbled together sponsor's logo very hard to make out black on red, I know it's their logo but the wording's too small on that background pinstripe looks like a middlesboro 70's throwback chest and sleeves look like different shades of red, poxy fiddly black bits of trim look like a man u misprint position of the gold sword thing above the back of shirt sponsor is a clumsy afterthought - if the sword thing is to work at all (one bit of gold on all that red white n black?) then the ITRM has to be under the numbers - or what about gold numbers with a superimposed sword symbol effect? I suspect too much interference from too many uncoordinated bunglers ending up with incompatible contractual obligations - classic twunt twattery. Love the hummel logo - can't see how it's a bee but like it all the same. In stark stark contrast the white shorts are simple, coordinated, uncluttered, a whole different class to the shirt. Chevrons on the front, of the otherwise decent socks, look really odd. Entirely academic until the toxic tosspot is consigned to history. CAFC kit only to be worn by those contractually obliged, lickspittles, simpletons and collaborators in the club's drawn out demise.
Do you EVER have anything good to say about anyone ? I look forward to telling my kids they are lickspittles and simpletons.
Mmmm not liking the lack of collar & the V neck combo...& the pinstripes will give me OCD,looks all over the place with logo's,badge etc...but at £45 & the fact Roly still owns the club,won't be buying one anyways...!!
if he goes,might be tempted by the 3rd Kit tho...👍
Comments
That can’t happen.
I’m at KB’s sons wife to be hen in Bournemouth!
Has to be automatic
Pin stripes less obvious than the 80s kit it is based on.
Sponsor doesn't quite work but not bothered about that.
Bad news is the Museum haven't got their complimentary shirt from Hummel this season
Prefer last two years but better than those before that.
sponsor's logo very hard to make out black on red, I know it's their logo but the wording's too small on that background
pinstripe looks like a middlesboro 70's throwback
chest and sleeves look like different shades of red, poxy
fiddly black bits of trim look like a man u misprint
position of the gold sword thing above the back of shirt sponsor is a clumsy afterthought - if the sword thing is to work at all (one bit of gold on all that red white n black?) then the ITRM has to be under the numbers - or what about gold numbers with a superimposed sword symbol effect?
I suspect too much interference from too many uncoordinated bunglers ending up with incompatible contractual obligations - classic twunt twattery.
Love the hummel logo - can't see how it's a bee but like it all the same.
In stark stark contrast the white shorts are simple, coordinated, uncluttered, a whole different class to the shirt.
Chevrons on the front, of the otherwise decent socks, look really odd.
Entirely academic until the toxic tosspot is consigned to history.
CAFC kit only to be worn by those contractually obliged, lickspittles, simpletons and collaborators in the club's drawn out demise.
In my opinion
if he goes,might be tempted by the 3rd Kit tho...👍
official site says £45 adults £35 kids
roll on the away kit reveal....
Last game was the £10 Hummel top, this week will be too. Maybe next week it'll be the new one.
EDIT: Don't like the shirt, unless we're going to sign Ronnie Moore again. Too busy,