Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

New kit and sponsor (P108, 2021 new 3rd kit)

18889919394138

Comments

  • Addickted
    Addickted Posts: 19,456
    cafc999 said:
    cafc999 said:
    That's interesting. Hummel showed us a mock up shirt with a similar design which was really nice and everyone in the room said it should be training wear. 
    Nice to see the badge is the proper badge not some monotone monstrosity : -) @cafc999
    Cannot wait to see your face next season...
    I'll bring the matches and the petrol : - )
    You are @Goonerhater and I claim my £5.
  • Barcelona's kit for next season...


    Seemingly in a minority of one here, but i actually quite like that. Something different, and as others have said it's based on their club badge. 

    The 2 coloured shorts make it look worse though i think.
  • MattF
    MattF Posts: 3,797
    edited June 2021
    Cambridge's away Hummel shirt is a bit nicer than the home 


    The pattern on the shirt reminds me of something as well



  • Stewart
    Stewart Posts: 2,451
    Stewart said:
    Just watch Crystal Palace have half and half shorts next season. 
    I was close.



    It’s half and half socks next year. 
  • soapy_jones
    soapy_jones Posts: 21,348
    And they call us clowns!
  • ShootersHillGuru
    ShootersHillGuru Posts: 50,619
    Are we are we to assume that the fanfare for the new ground breaking sponsor is now not happening ? 
  • DA9
    DA9 Posts: 11,091
    Rangers new home shirt, slightly lighter image in one photo with pinstripe detail 
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,214
    Are we are we to assume that the fanfare for the new ground breaking sponsor is now not happening ? 
    Why would we assume that?
  • JiMMy 85
    JiMMy 85 Posts: 10,189
    DA9 said:
    Rangers new home shirt, slightly lighter image in one photo with pinstripe detail 
    The betting sponsor ruins that shirt. 
  • Swisdom
    Swisdom Posts: 14,976
    DA9 said:
    Rangers new home shirt, slightly lighter image in one photo with pinstripe detail 
    Not with Hummel any more I see.  Nice shirt tbf
  • Sponsored links:



  • SheffieldRed
    SheffieldRed Posts: 3,772
    Modelled on this? Prefer the original 
  • Miserableoldgit
    Miserableoldgit Posts: 21,458
    JiMMy 85 said:
    DA9 said:
    Rangers new home shirt, slightly lighter image in one photo with pinstripe detail 
    The betting sponsor ruins that shirt. 
    The betting sponsor, the badge on the left breast and the fact it is blue ruins that shirt.




    *Joking !!!!
    😉
  • DA9
    DA9 Posts: 11,091
    Swisdom said:
    DA9 said:
    Rangers new home shirt, slightly lighter image in one photo with pinstripe detail 
    Not with Hummel any more I see.  Nice shirt tbf
    Second season with Castore 
  • DA9
    DA9 Posts: 11,091
    Modelled on this? Prefer the original 
    A thing of beauty 
  • guinnessaddick
    guinnessaddick Posts: 28,597
    What's with the 150 years?
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,214
    What's with the 150 years?
    Should be 11 I think
  • https://www.gazettelive.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/teesside-research-dozens-designs-year-20909349.amp?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=sharebar&__twitter_impression=true

    Interesting article on how Hummel have researched/designed Boro's kits over the last few seasons. Re-emphasises how lucky we are to have these guys making our kits rather than getting hand-me-down templates from the likes of Nike
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,214
    Very similar to what Rob told me and @cafc999 about the process 

    We have the 30 odd initial designs from the season before last in the museum plus swatches and design instructions.
  • RC_CAFC
    RC_CAFC Posts: 1,754
    I really hope we stick with Hummel next year. I think it’s even more fitting now with our Danish links. So much thought goes into each and every kit. And they’ve all been at least decent.
  • Taxi_Lad
    Taxi_Lad Posts: 3,766
    Haven’t liked the material or the fit of the Hummel shirts I’ve bought compared to Nike. Decent designs though!
  • Sponsored links:



  • ShootersHillGuru
    ShootersHillGuru Posts: 50,619
    Are we are we to assume that the fanfare for the new ground breaking sponsor is now not happening ? 
    Why would we assume that?
    Because after the “imminent” comment was made which to me implies very soon, zip all has happened. 
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,214
    Are we are we to assume that the fanfare for the new ground breaking sponsor is now not happening ? 
    Why would we assume that?
    Because after the “imminent” comment was made which to me implies very soon, zip all has happened. 
    But that has nothing to any "fanfare" happening.

    IMHO the deal isn't done as otherwise it would have been announced but if/when it is there will be some fanfare because that is what the sponsor will almost certainly want. 

    Otherwise, why bother spending a few hundred thousand (and that is likely to be the annual amount, not millions) sponsoring a football club?

    Again, we don't know "zip all" has happened, we only know it hasn't been announced, probably, IMHO, because it's not been signed off/has collapsed/never existed.

    But absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

    The use of "imminent" was unwise in my opinion but it's hardly surprising that a sales and marketing guy talked up his pipeline. 

    As ever, ignore terms like "imminent" and remember WIOTOS
  • randy andy
    randy andy Posts: 5,454
    Why would any sponsor want their announcement to be lost in the general football noise of of euros? I can see any sponsor, partner or new kit announcements being made whilst England are still in the Euros, and probably not whilst the Euros are even happening 
  • ShootersHillGuru
    ShootersHillGuru Posts: 50,619
    Are we are we to assume that the fanfare for the new ground breaking sponsor is now not happening ? 
    Why would we assume that?
    Because after the “imminent” comment was made which to me implies very soon, zip all has happened. 
    But that has nothing to any "fanfare" happening.

    IMHO the deal isn't done as otherwise it would have been announced but if/when it is there will be some fanfare because that is what the sponsor will almost certainly want. 

    Otherwise, why bother spending a few hundred thousand (and that is likely to be the annual amount, not millions) sponsoring a football club?

    Again, we don't know "zip all" has happened, we only know it hasn't been announced, probably, IMHO, because it's not been signed off/has collapsed/never existed.

    But absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

    The use of "imminent" was unwise in my opinion but it's hardly surprising that a sales and marketing guy talked up his pipeline. 

    As ever, ignore terms like "imminent" and remember WIOTOS
    Not only was the use of the word “imminent” unwise. It was untrue.
  • DA9
    DA9 Posts: 11,091
    Are we are we to assume that the fanfare for the new ground breaking sponsor is now not happening ? 
    Why would we assume that?
    Because after the “imminent” comment was made which to me implies very soon, zip all has happened. 
    But that has nothing to any "fanfare" happening.

    IMHO the deal isn't done as otherwise it would have been announced but if/when it is there will be some fanfare because that is what the sponsor will almost certainly want. 

    Otherwise, why bother spending a few hundred thousand (and that is likely to be the annual amount, not millions) sponsoring a football club?

    Again, we don't know "zip all" has happened, we only know it hasn't been announced, probably, IMHO, because it's not been signed off/has collapsed/never existed.

    But absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

    The use of "imminent" was unwise in my opinion but it's hardly surprising that a sales and marketing guy talked up his pipeline. 

    As ever, ignore terms like "imminent" and remember WIOTOS
    Must be double jointed 
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,214
    Are we are we to assume that the fanfare for the new ground breaking sponsor is now not happening ? 
    Why would we assume that?
    Because after the “imminent” comment was made which to me implies very soon, zip all has happened. 
    But that has nothing to any "fanfare" happening.

    IMHO the deal isn't done as otherwise it would have been announced but if/when it is there will be some fanfare because that is what the sponsor will almost certainly want. 

    Otherwise, why bother spending a few hundred thousand (and that is likely to be the annual amount, not millions) sponsoring a football club?

    Again, we don't know "zip all" has happened, we only know it hasn't been announced, probably, IMHO, because it's not been signed off/has collapsed/never existed.

    But absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

    The use of "imminent" was unwise in my opinion but it's hardly surprising that a sales and marketing guy talked up his pipeline. 

    As ever, ignore terms like "imminent" and remember WIOTOS
    Not only was the use of the word “imminent” unwise. It was untrue.
    Possibly.

    Or maybe it was imminent and then a problem came up a bit like a last minute snag when selling a house.


  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,344
    Taxi_Lad said:
    Haven’t liked the material or the fit of the Hummel shirts I’ve bought compared to Nike. Decent designs though!
    Hummel's shirts are a more sporty fit and fabric is comparable imo - actually it's not they're nicer for doing sport in than the Nike stuff was. 

    Designs are streets ahead of the Nike stuff, but that's cos we were a catalogue club. 
  • SporadicAddick
    SporadicAddick Posts: 6,846
    DA9 said:
    Modelled on this? Prefer the original 
    A thing of beauty 
    all kits also look better with proper boots (Adidas World Cup / Adidas Copa Mundial / Puma King - delete as appropriate)
  • ElfsborgAddick
    ElfsborgAddick Posts: 29,024
    Adidas consistently produce decent tops.
  • sam3110
    sam3110 Posts: 21,244
    edited June 2021
    Adidas Nike and Puma, unless you are a big team with millions of shirt sales every year, are complete pony. The smaller kit brands like Hummel, Errea etc are much better for teams like us as they get more exposure and we get more bespoke kits. 

    Like Henners said, Hummel would send us patterns, designs etc for loads of ideas for kits. Nike sent us a catalogue with 4 red kits in it circled and said pick one for us to stick your badge on, oh and btw Leyton Orient and Barnsley already picked these 2 and Southend, Portsmouth and Peterborough have these other ones but in different colours