Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

New kit and sponsor (P108, 2021 new 3rd kit)

18889919394138

Comments

  • cafc999 said:
    cafc999 said:
    That's interesting. Hummel showed us a mock up shirt with a similar design which was really nice and everyone in the room said it should be training wear. 
    Nice to see the badge is the proper badge not some monotone monstrosity : -) @cafc999
    Cannot wait to see your face next season...
    I'll bring the matches and the petrol : - )
    You are @Goonerhater and I claim my £5.
  • Barcelona's kit for next season...


    Seemingly in a minority of one here, but i actually quite like that. Something different, and as others have said it's based on their club badge. 

    The 2 coloured shorts make it look worse though i think.
  • Stewart said:
    Just watch Crystal Palace have half and half shorts next season. 
    I was close.



    It’s half and half socks next year. 
  • And they call us clowns!
  • Are we are we to assume that the fanfare for the new ground breaking sponsor is now not happening ? 
  • Are we are we to assume that the fanfare for the new ground breaking sponsor is now not happening ? 
    Why would we assume that?
  • DA9 said:
    Rangers new home shirt, slightly lighter image in one photo with pinstripe detail 
    The betting sponsor ruins that shirt. 
  • DA9 said:
    Rangers new home shirt, slightly lighter image in one photo with pinstripe detail 
    Not with Hummel any more I see.  Nice shirt tbf
  • Sponsored links:


  • Modelled on this? Prefer the original 
  • JiMMy 85 said:
    DA9 said:
    Rangers new home shirt, slightly lighter image in one photo with pinstripe detail 
    The betting sponsor ruins that shirt. 
    The betting sponsor, the badge on the left breast and the fact it is blue ruins that shirt.




    *Joking !!!!
    😉
  • Swisdom said:
    DA9 said:
    Rangers new home shirt, slightly lighter image in one photo with pinstripe detail 
    Not with Hummel any more I see.  Nice shirt tbf
    Second season with Castore 
  • Modelled on this? Prefer the original 
    A thing of beauty 
  • What's with the 150 years?
  • Very similar to what Rob told me and @cafc999 about the process 

    We have the 30 odd initial designs from the season before last in the museum plus swatches and design instructions.
  • Haven’t liked the material or the fit of the Hummel shirts I’ve bought compared to Nike. Decent designs though!
  • Sponsored links:


  • Are we are we to assume that the fanfare for the new ground breaking sponsor is now not happening ? 
    Why would we assume that?
    Because after the “imminent” comment was made which to me implies very soon, zip all has happened. 
  • Are we are we to assume that the fanfare for the new ground breaking sponsor is now not happening ? 
    Why would we assume that?
    Because after the “imminent” comment was made which to me implies very soon, zip all has happened. 
    But that has nothing to any "fanfare" happening.

    IMHO the deal isn't done as otherwise it would have been announced but if/when it is there will be some fanfare because that is what the sponsor will almost certainly want. 

    Otherwise, why bother spending a few hundred thousand (and that is likely to be the annual amount, not millions) sponsoring a football club?

    Again, we don't know "zip all" has happened, we only know it hasn't been announced, probably, IMHO, because it's not been signed off/has collapsed/never existed.

    But absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

    The use of "imminent" was unwise in my opinion but it's hardly surprising that a sales and marketing guy talked up his pipeline. 

    As ever, ignore terms like "imminent" and remember WIOTOS
  • Why would any sponsor want their announcement to be lost in the general football noise of of euros? I can see any sponsor, partner or new kit announcements being made whilst England are still in the Euros, and probably not whilst the Euros are even happening 
  • Are we are we to assume that the fanfare for the new ground breaking sponsor is now not happening ? 
    Why would we assume that?
    Because after the “imminent” comment was made which to me implies very soon, zip all has happened. 
    But that has nothing to any "fanfare" happening.

    IMHO the deal isn't done as otherwise it would have been announced but if/when it is there will be some fanfare because that is what the sponsor will almost certainly want. 

    Otherwise, why bother spending a few hundred thousand (and that is likely to be the annual amount, not millions) sponsoring a football club?

    Again, we don't know "zip all" has happened, we only know it hasn't been announced, probably, IMHO, because it's not been signed off/has collapsed/never existed.

    But absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

    The use of "imminent" was unwise in my opinion but it's hardly surprising that a sales and marketing guy talked up his pipeline. 

    As ever, ignore terms like "imminent" and remember WIOTOS
    Not only was the use of the word “imminent” unwise. It was untrue.
  • Are we are we to assume that the fanfare for the new ground breaking sponsor is now not happening ? 
    Why would we assume that?
    Because after the “imminent” comment was made which to me implies very soon, zip all has happened. 
    But that has nothing to any "fanfare" happening.

    IMHO the deal isn't done as otherwise it would have been announced but if/when it is there will be some fanfare because that is what the sponsor will almost certainly want. 

    Otherwise, why bother spending a few hundred thousand (and that is likely to be the annual amount, not millions) sponsoring a football club?

    Again, we don't know "zip all" has happened, we only know it hasn't been announced, probably, IMHO, because it's not been signed off/has collapsed/never existed.

    But absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

    The use of "imminent" was unwise in my opinion but it's hardly surprising that a sales and marketing guy talked up his pipeline. 

    As ever, ignore terms like "imminent" and remember WIOTOS
    Not only was the use of the word “imminent” unwise. It was untrue.
    Possibly.

    Or maybe it was imminent and then a problem came up a bit like a last minute snag when selling a house.


  • Taxi_Lad said:
    Haven’t liked the material or the fit of the Hummel shirts I’ve bought compared to Nike. Decent designs though!
    Hummel's shirts are a more sporty fit and fabric is comparable imo - actually it's not they're nicer for doing sport in than the Nike stuff was. 

    Designs are streets ahead of the Nike stuff, but that's cos we were a catalogue club. 
  • Adidas consistently produce decent tops.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!