We've certainly missed Gallagher's goal threat and in this article he claims he moved because we couldn't keep possession of the ball.
Wales Online: Chelsea's Conor Gallagher transfer decision explained as Swansea City star opens up on Frank Lampard messages.
https://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/chelsea-conor-gallagher-swansea-charlton-18541300
Comments
Not scored for Swansea though, and they are below us in the form table.
Err, this is what he actually said.
"Chelsea thought it was best for me to go to Swansea and it's turned out well because I've developed a lot here as a player and a person as well, so it was definitely a good move for me," he told WhoScored.
"I think at Swansea they have more of the ball than Charlton did, and he (Cooper) gave me a chance to create more chances and I think that's why I've got a number of assists for Swansea.
"I think I've been a little bit unlucky not to score a couple of goals with Swansea, but I think that that will come.
"As long as I'm helping the team as much as I can, that's the most important thing."
So thats 3 assists in 13 games, its not like he is banging assists left right and centre.
An attacking midfielder to score
0 in 13
Assist
3 in 13
Is bang average
Well the virus has messed up the agent’s plan for a big commission when Chelsea sell him in summer.
It’s possible though that the agent got wind of the bogus nature of the ESI takeover and this helped him sell the idea to “Chelsea” that he should move on.
He can still rot in hell together with Taylor’s agent, Lee Matthews, and the other lowlife scumbags who drained £350 mill out of the English game and into their pockets last season.
Palace rumoured to be interested in Conor and preparing a £10m bid.
if we wanted him to play with U23 players, we would have kept him here.
Had he finished with us and got to 10+ goals playing well then I think he would have, but he realy hasn't pulled up any trees since moving to Swansea and think he will get another Championship loan
That article does little to change that......other than to add yet another theory and make it seven.🤔
Also, how do we know 'Flo' and Cudicini had no say in this? Have they confirmed that somewhere that I've missed?
I think it's true to say that Chelsea WERE happy with his progress, but that was before we started playing the youth team and Gallagher started clearly getting targeted by the opposition. They then changed their minds - around the same time it was looking pretty clear we weren't getting any decent new players in - and decided he would be better playing in a mans team.
Prague thinks some Machiavellian agent was behind it all and refuses to see any other motive.