Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)
Comments
-
se9addick said:CL_Phantom said:There's a limited amount of slots on Teams, say 200 people can join and theres 600 trying to log in, it creates a queuing system, people that need to be there will get caught in the queue - causing delays- you then have to take into consideration the courts ability to host, connection speeds, bandwith, server... sure Teams and the courts hardware can host 200 people - but not necessarily successfully.
I've sat in a team training meeting on Teams, 42 people, one person sharing a screen so we can watch.. it was shite.
There are large Courts so they can all keep COVID distances and they knew from last time that there would be a huge demand from fans to watch. Pathetic IMO.2 -
I’ll take no news as good news. Guessing it taking place with main people now on a private link. Assume rick or Cawley would have said otherwise1
-
They should have known there was significant interest.
2 -
Doesn’t this all seem a bit odd?
System crashes so now only the main players are given the link to join?
Or am I being too cynical here?1 -
-
Why do we always finish last?1
-
Covered End said:Nadou said:jacob_CAFC said:How can this be put at the door of the fans? Absolutely absurd to suggest that.
Anyone not turning off camera & mics was neither here nor there.
It didn't proceed because the judge, solicitors & Elliot couldn't join.
This is down to the court's procedures and no one else.
At least we know who to blame.0 -
KBslittlesis said:Doesn’t this all seem a bit odd?
System crashes so now only the main players are given the link to join?
Or am I being too cynical here?1 -
meldrew66 said:We, the invited fans, have done nothing wrong. Mics and cameras on were inevitable but had not part to play in the delay. It's bizarre that they didn't let the key players in first. Almost unbelievable really as this was always going to happen.
5 - Sponsored links:
-
SoundAsa£ said:CL_Phantom said:There's a limited amount of slots on Teams, say 200 people can join and theres 600 trying to log in, it creates a queuing system, people that need to be there will get caught in the queue - causing delays- you then have to take into consideration the courts ability to host, connection speeds, bandwith, server... sure Teams and the courts hardware can host 200 people - but not necessarily successfully.
I've sat in a team training meeting on Teams, 42 people, one person sharing a screen so we can watch.. it was shite.
And I imagine the email request and invite from the court is automated, I doubt a secretary sat there and counted through 200+ emails.
I don't understand why anyone would blame this on fans trying to watch. As if they knew that by watching this would happen.6 -
SoundAsa£ said:CL_Phantom said:There's a limited amount of slots on Teams, say 200 people can join and theres 600 trying to log in, it creates a queuing system, people that need to be there will get caught in the queue - causing delays- you then have to take into consideration the courts ability to host, connection speeds, bandwith, server... sure Teams and the courts hardware can host 200 people - but not necessarily successfully.
I've sat in a team training meeting on Teams, 42 people, one person sharing a screen so we can watch.. it was shite.
And I imagine the email request and invite from the court is automated, I doubt a secretary sat there and counted through 200+ emails.
Best court away following in England #CAFC37 -
AFKABartram said:Never fail to be unsurprised that some Charlton fans instant reaction is to blame other Charlton fans.
This is the courts / judiciary of our great nation. What a shambles.3 -
ForeverAddickted said:1
-
This isn't the fans fault this is the courts fault without a doubt, why the fuck they didn't just let the relevant parties in first is anyones guess4
-
Ok Millwall smash up pubs etc but Charlton fans break the British court system and the internet !13
-
i_b_b_o_r_g said:In.
Faith in the British Justice System restored.......for the minute0 -
well, certainly not had the new link emailed to me.
1 -
Is Phillips starting or are we going with Amos ??1
-
2 - Sponsored links:
-
jacob_CAFC said:KBslittlesis said:Doesn’t this all seem a bit odd?
System crashes so now only the main players are given the link to join?
Or am I being too cynical here?1 -
It is being held up north, what do you expect from them. Years behind the times.
Useless wankers.8 -
Well at least the Judge will know how much interest there is for us to be able to move on.0
-
se9addick said:ForeverAddickted said:1
-
se9addick said:ForeverAddickted said:0
-
It just makes me laugh... Who could have predicted this? Yet another bizarre twist in our cruel journey2
-
Does anyone know what the state of play is, or we got to wait till tomorrows papers to find out?1
-
Someone WhatsApp when it's over0
-
for all we know the court session has started with just the main combatants involved7
-
KBslittlesis said:se9addick said:ForeverAddickted said:0
This discussion has been closed.