ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)

roseandcrown

MattF said:

Hear that Farnell took a bit of pasting towards the end, anyone got any quotes on what was said?

Got called a see you next Tuesday and bet he his wife is going to get a beatin tonight after a line of Charlie. He was apparently still on but on mute. I left so might be more

Nicholas

Valley11 said:

Love that you can see Tracey Leaburn glued to checking court proceedings on her phone as we score....

Biggest efl trophy crowd for years 

se9addick

roseandcrown said:

MattF said:

Hear that Farnell took a bit of pasting towards the end, anyone got any quotes on what was said?

Got called a see you next Tuesday and bet he his wife is going to get a beatin tonight after a line of Charlie. He was apparently still on but on mute. I left so might be more

Yeah I left at that point, I know folk are pissed off but..

roseandcrown

Valley11 said:

So there will still be a trial? 

Yes but hopefully nothing to do with cafc at that point. 

I'm no expert but assume it will be hard to claim anything against Nimer and getting him to court

king addick

GoOnYouHaddocks said:

MattF said:

I had a little pray earlier for the first time in my rabid atheist life, might have to do this more often

Nooooo, don't go over to the dark side. Remember, correlation does not imply causation.

Dont remember Yoda saying that....?

Todds_right_hook

_MrDick said:

If I was 30 years younger, I’d be round LK’s dad’s house to ask for her hand in marriage ... what a gal 

Do it anyway

golfaddick

Scoham said:

https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/charlton-athletic-get-new-ownership-boost-as-judge-decides-not-to-impose-injunction-blocking-sale/

It says that tomorrow can be also used so that PE can put in an appeal.....

BalladMan

In the words of the wonderful Idles:

"Let's seize the day
All hold hands, chase the pricks away
Let's seize the day
All hold hands, chase the pricks away

You can do it
You can do it
Yes you can
Woo"

Well done to all those that played a big part in breaking down the first big barrier to a brave new world.  We are stronger collectively than these individual pricks. 

killerandflash

Stig said:

Sounds like a magnificent job by Lauren Kreamer. Was she picked for the job because she was a Charlton fan or is that coincidental?

She's a barrister with relevant experience in commercial law and contractual disputes. 

Obviously that's she's a fan makes her doubly good, but I'm sure they wouldn't have chosen her if she wasn't right for the case

ricky_otto

Todds_right_hook said:

_MrDick said:

If I was 30 years younger, I’d be round LK’s dad’s house to ask for her hand in marriage ... what a gal 

Do it anyway

To late my proposal has been accepted. He will have to put an injunction out on me - he better have a good barrister...I have. 

WSS

killerandflash said:

Stig said:

Sounds like a magnificent job by Lauren Kreamer. Was she picked for the job because she was a Charlton fan or is that coincidental?

She's a barrister with relevant experience in commercial law and contractual disputes. 

Obviously that's she's a fan makes her doubly good, but I'm sure they wouldn't have chosen her if she wasn't right for the case

Pro bono case? So free as well...

bobmunro

roseandcrown said:

Valley11 said:

So there will still be a trial? 

Yes but hopefully nothing to do with cafc at that point. 

I'm no expert but assume it will be hard to claim anything against Nimer and getting him to court

Where on earth will Elliot get the money to fund a full trial? I doubt we will hear anything more from him (but he might from us!).

I believe all three objectives will now be achieved.

1. Farnell out of our club

2. Farnell out of football

3. Farnell struck off

SoundAsa£

roseandcrown said:

Valley11 said:

So there will still be a trial? 

Yes but hopefully nothing to do with cafc at that point. 

I'm no expert but assume it will be hard to claim anything against Nimer and getting him to court

What about Southall though?

Rob7Lee

bobmunro said:

roseandcrown said:

Valley11 said:

So there will still be a trial? 

Yes but hopefully nothing to do with cafc at that point. 

I'm no expert but assume it will be hard to claim anything against Nimer and getting him to court

Where on earth will Elliot get the money to fund a full trial? I doubt we will hear anything more from him (but he might from us!).

I believe all three objectives will now be achieved.

1. Farnell out of our club

2. Farnell out of football

3. Farnell struck off

Think he'll be more worried about owing 700k to his 'consortium'.

Wouldn't put it past Farnell though, he's in tatters post all this.

MuttleyCAFC

If that happens, let's raise a glass to Bury fans and hope they take some comfort from it.

ross1

golfaddick said:

Scoham said:

https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/charlton-athletic-get-new-ownership-boost-as-judge-decides-not-to-impose-injunction-blocking-sale/

It says that tomorrow can be also used so that PE can put in an appeal.....

“Given the time and given the potential need to protect the position of any party who seeks to consider appealing my judgement, I will adjourn any application for permission to appeal to the consequential hearing [tomorrow] so that issue doesn’t have to be separately dealt with this evening.”

pettgra

Excellent, Lauren you are a star.
Will this lovely club ever stop trying to get me an ulcer.

Fortune 82nd Minute

bobmunro said:

roseandcrown said:

Valley11 said:

So there will still be a trial? 

Yes but hopefully nothing to do with cafc at that point. 

I'm no expert but assume it will be hard to claim anything against Nimer and getting him to court

Where on earth will Elliot get the money to fund a full trial? I doubt we will hear anything more from him (but he might from us!).

I believe all three objectives will now be achieved.

1. Farnell out of our club

2. Farnell out of football

3. Farnell struck off

Well I'd like a 4th. I'd like to see the bastard put away.

Redrobo

It would be nice if we could get a great quote from the trial and have it put up at the top of the covered end with her name on it.

MuttleyCAFC

Wouldn't they need grounds for appeal? 

Valleyfan2

Brilliant result, well done Lauren. Just a word of caution though, at the consequential hearing tomorrow the judge will consider any application (if there is one) by Elliot for permission to appeal his decision. Costs of appealing would be very high so can’t see Elliot wanting to (or able to) go down that route. 

bobmunro

ross1 said:

golfaddick said:

Scoham said:

https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/charlton-athletic-get-new-ownership-boost-as-judge-decides-not-to-impose-injunction-blocking-sale/

It says that tomorrow can be also used so that PE can put in an appeal.....

“Given the time and given the potential need to protect the position of any party who seeks to consider appealing my judgement, I will adjourn any application for permission to appeal to the consequential hearing [tomorrow] so that issue doesn’t have to be separately dealt with this evening.”

I very much doubt he will be given leave to appeal - and even if he is, more bad money after bad.

GlassHalfFull

There once was an underhand schemer
Who hadn't allowed for Ms Kreamer
Alas for his hopes
He was pinned on the ropes
As she netted a 30-yard screamer

stonemuse

stonemuse said:

Definitely delaying tactics being used here ... I believe the judge will see through this and not allow it ... still expect a decision in favour of ESI1 today 

You should listen to me and stop panicking 

JoshrewCAFC

carly burn said:

J BLOCK said:

Can we do something for her to show our thanks?

#ThanksLauren

8pm. Twitter

For those that didn't see this ^^

Chris_from_Sidcup

jacob_CAFC said:

Another idiot saying something. Called the judge a nonce it seems 

I hope whoever this was is busy writing a very nice letter of apology to Judge Pearce.

Raith_C_Chattonell

Congratulations Lauren Kreamer, stuck one past those cheating bar stewards tonight eh?

fat man on a moped

bobmunro said:

ross1 said:

golfaddick said:

Scoham said:

https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/charlton-athletic-get-new-ownership-boost-as-judge-decides-not-to-impose-injunction-blocking-sale/

It says that tomorrow can be also used so that PE can put in an appeal.....

“Given the time and given the potential need to protect the position of any party who seeks to consider appealing my judgement, I will adjourn any application for permission to appeal to the consequential hearing [tomorrow] so that issue doesn’t have to be separately dealt with this evening.”

I very much doubt he will be given leave to appeal - and even if he is, more bad money after bad.

Even if he does I assume it doesn't stop Panorama selling in the meantime. Then he would have to fight it out with them which would be no concern of ours anymore.

AddickUpNorth

Fortune 82nd Minute said:

bobmunro said:

roseandcrown said:

Valley11 said:

So there will still be a trial? 

Yes but hopefully nothing to do with cafc at that point. 

I'm no expert but assume it will be hard to claim anything against Nimer and getting him to court

Where on earth will Elliot get the money to fund a full trial? I doubt we will hear anything more from him (but he might from us!).

I believe all three objectives will now be achieved.

1. Farnell out of our club

2. Farnell out of football

3. Farnell struck off

Well I'd like a 4th. I'd like to see the bastard put away.

And I’d like to be there when he rocks up to reception........

stoneroses19

Chunes said:

Judge said he was absolutely satisfied that Chris Farnell had engaged in a conflict of interests.

Surely the SRA have got to take notice of that. 

Let's get the bastard struck off. 

Absolutely. I wonder if the judges direct quotes about Farnell from today can be sent to the SRA.