Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Sandgaard on Talksport today - 17/11/20

1456810

Comments

  • When and if Elliott put money into the club it was before TS was around so I would have thought he should go after Nimer, good luck with that! Can't see why it should fall to TS to cover Elliott's mistake!
  • "For legal reasons I cannot comment on that. Mr Sandgaard just uses a lot of cheap tricks"
    Freshfields are not cheap!!
  • edited November 2020
    Practically on your last legs, give up the chase PE. You tried a dirty trick and it uncovered itself as one. You're chasing shadows for a pay off but you're chasing the wrong people now. 
  • "Why hasn't anyone come to me and made an offer" - Shows he is just in it for the money, in black and white right there. Just wants to be paid off by Sandgaard.
    Playing devils advocate here, as I’m an outsider looking in and don’t know all the details, but if it’s proven that PE did put half a million in to keep the club afloat, when Nimar clearly wasn’t bothered about it, why is he being so unreasonable to expect his money back, and even a bit of profit? Would you write off half a million? 

    I mean, it looks like Nimar has come out of it with a bit of profit, and he never put a penny in? 
    Sandgaard has previously said that anyone who deserved to be paid, would be paid. There were also reports (not sure how true) that he did in fact offer Elliott a pay off, but Elliott wanted more.

    Sandgaard doesn't actually have to pay Elliott, Nimer should be the one paying Elliott. Obviously though he's disappeared away into the arabian desert and Elliott knows he's got zero chance of anything through him, so he's now scrambling around trying to get something out of Sandgaard.
  • edited November 2020
    Had Elliot(t) passed the EFL tests he could well be in a different position now. The fact is that not only did he not, but he doesn't seem to have put any effort in to resolving the issue. Even though his camp said it was a minor (MINOR) admin issue. And even though it was stopping the club putting a decent squad together for this campaign.

    Even though he has eventually won the court case with Nimer by default, he could have strengthened his case in previous hearings by passing those tests. It can only be concluded that he has been aware for some time that he can't pass them. What other explanation can there be. Why he would want to own the club when the result ultimately would be its expulsion from the league needs explaining.
  • So did TS go on the show in the end ?
  • Sponsored links:


  • Thomas on now.
  • I wish Thomas would stop going on TalkSport. If they wanna chat shit about us then let them. Use the club's media outlets to answer back when needed.
  • Of course when I've turned it off... Be gone by the time I get it back online!

  • Elliot's interpretation of the court ruling seems a bit loose and free.  Did it state anywhere that he owns Charlton Athletic-  as he claims?  
  • Dazzler21 said:
    Over £800,000 of range rovers... 

    Buy Valley Pass to win a range rover - Farnell's specifically! - I AM DEFINITELY GETTING INVOLVED IN THAT DRAW! (Will need full valet mind, as it's likely quite dirty).
    You'll never get rid of the smell

  • TS going for Farnell more. 

    Sad Franell was basically saying pay him to make the injunction go away back in September. 

    Farnell had one of the Range Rovers. 

    Farnell still making claims for monies and this is part of the play. 


    Go on Thomas lad
  • Sponsored links:


  • edited November 2020
    Also Jim asked him if he had put money in. He said he had put 12m in the clubs account and that he is losing a million a month. 

    Loads of claims coming in for money from friends or family off previous owners they are dealing with. 
  • Anyone got a link?
  • "Why hasn't anyone come to me and made an offer" - Shows he is just in it for the money, in black and white right there. Just wants to be paid off by Sandgaard.
    Playing devils advocate here, as I’m an outsider looking in and don’t know all the details, but if it’s proven that PE did put half a million in to keep the club afloat, when Nimar clearly wasn’t bothered about it, why is he being so unreasonable to expect his money back, and even a bit of profit? Would you write off half a million? 

    I mean, it looks like Nimar has come out of it with a bit of profit, and he never put a penny in? 
    Sandgaard has previously said that anyone who deserved to be paid, would be paid. There were also reports (not sure how true) that he did in fact offer Elliott a pay off, but Elliott wanted more.

    Sandgaard doesn't actually have to pay Elliott, Nimer should be the one paying Elliott. Obviously though he's disappeared away into the arabian desert and Elliott knows he's got zero chance of anything through him, so he's now scrambling around trying to get something out of Sandgaard.
    The trouble is the lawyers' time is costly, so as he intimated just now on TalkSport, he may have to pay them off to go away. I love that the Range Rover in the competition was Farnell's! This guy has the touch! We may even get some more supporters out of it as more people will but Valley Passes. I just hope it goes to a genuine supporter
  • masicat said:
    Asking Jim White what he thinks of Farnell. TS is a legend. Surely, Farnell will be sued on next. Well done once again to Simon Jordan.
    Asking the prat White what he thought of Fartsmell, of course he wouldn't be able to answer, he would have to check with his boss first... oh hang on there, that is Fartsmell ain't it, awkward moment ;)
  • Paul if you did put any money in all you have paid for is a few range rovers for your mates. In fact hopefully you have paid for one of those Range Rovers for me, would love to win one. Piss off now Paul
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!