Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Players Marks: Burton Albion v Charlton Athletic (Closes Wednesday evening)

124»

Comments

  • Amos; 5
    Matthews: 5 
    Gunter: 4 One big F up! Is he playing CB to accom Mathews? Barker would be better surely if Oshilaja and Pearce are not fit!
    Pratley: 3 Got the energy but a headless chicken!
    Maatsen: 3 Very poor!
    Watson: 3 Whats he bring to the team?
    Gilbey: 5
    Shinnie: 5
    Maddison: 2.5 Why the **** did we sign him!
    Bogle: 4
    Smyth: 5
    Aneke: 7.5
    Washington: 6
    Morgan: 8
    Referee: 5
  • Might be influenced by getting up at 0300 to watch that nonsense

    Amos; 4
    Matthews: 5
    Gunter: 3
    Pratley: 3
    Maatsen: 1 I would love to see his stats but pass completion and dribble completion must be less than 10%. Before Saturday he was impressive but I guess that is why he is with us he still has alot to learn
    Watson: 5
    Gilbey: 4
    Shinnie: 4
    Maddison: 3 Will he ever find that yard of pace to get away from anyone
    Bogle: 3
    Smyth: 3
    Aneke: 8
    Washington: 4
    Morgan: 7
  • Amos;          6.0
    Matthews:    6.0
    Gunter:        5.0
    Pratley:        5.0
    Maatsen:     4.5
    Watson:       5.0       
    Gilbey:         4.5
    Shinnie:       5.0
    Maddison:    4.0
    Bogle:          4.0
    Smyth:         5.0
    Aneke:         7.0
    Washington: 6.5
    Morgan:       7.5
    Referee:       5.0

    Williams: n/a

    Bowyer         4.0  Got it so wrong

  • Amos; 4
    Matthews: 5.5
    Gunter: 5
    Pratley: 5.5
    Maatsen: 5
    Watson: 5.5
    Gilbey: 5.5
    Shinnie: 5.5
    Maddison: 5
    Bogle: 5
    Smyth: 6
    Aneke: 7.5
    Washington: 6
    Morgan: 7
    Referee: 2

  • Amos; 4 
    Matthews: 7
    Gunter: 4
    Pratley: 6
    Maatsen: 6
    Watson: 5
    Gilbey: 6
    Shinnie: 5
    Maddison: 2
    Bogle: 2
    Smyth: 5
    Aneke: 8
    Washington: 7
    Morgan: 8

  • Amos; 4 worst game for us 
    Matthews: 6 best of defence 
    Gunter: 3 no more cb unless in a 5 
    Pratley: 3 no more cb unless in a 5 
    Maatsen: 6 some marking him harshly so extra mark as one of few who seemed to care and try even if wasn’t his day 
    Watson: 5 ok 
    Gilbey: 5 very rusty 
    Shinnie: 5 game passed him by 
    Maddison: 4 1 extra mark for some good balls but overall work rate was really poor n wasn’t good again 
    Bogle: 5 felt for him a little 
    Smyth: 6 ok 
    Aneke: 8 excellent has to start 
    Washington: 7 dangerous 
    Morgan: 8.5 motm done more in his time on the pitch than all starters put together 
    Referee: 4 not as bad as the one Saturday but really not good either 
  • Amos; 5
    Matthews: 6
    Gunter: 4
    Pratley: 5
    Maatsen: 4
    Watson: 5.5
    Gilbey: 4.5
    Shinnie: 5
    Maddison: 4
    Bogle: 4
    Smyth: 5
    Aneke: 7
    Washington: 6
    Morgan: 6.5
    Referee 6

    Doesn’t include the last few minutes as I couldn’t bear to watch any more!!
  • aliwibble said:
    Amos; 5.5 - 
    Matthews: 5 - 
    Gunter: 3.5 - dreadful. 
    Pratley: 4.5 - 
    Maatsen: 4 - worst performance for us 
    Watson: 6 - tried to get things going, but slow at times 
    Gilbey: 5 - Rusty and not a wife left player 
    Shinnie: 5 - forgot he was playing 
    Maddison: 4 - not fit at all 
    Bogle: 4 - needs to come out of the team 
    Smyth: 6.5 - pleased he got a goal. 
    Aneke: 6 - what a goal. Needs to be starting games 
    Washington: 6.5 - got in to decent positions, should have had at least 1 goal 
    Morgan: 7 - excellent in the time he was in the pitch 
    Referee: 5
    @ricky_otto is that a typo? Or have you deducted him half a mark for getting in the way of that  shot of Washington's?
    No no, that’s my mark for him. Maybe a bit harsh. 
    I think a little harsh, certainly in comparison to Smyth, who despite scoring made little impression otherwise, and that's said as someone who generally appreciates his play. You could argue that was down to him not getting the service from those around him, but while he wasn't actively bad, I'd say his positive impact was less than Chuks.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!