The only way to judge our season is to compare us with Wigan .. both of us were in the same situation in September/October concerning embargo, working solely under wage cap and hoping for a takeover .. luckily we got our hero in TS but look at Wigan and where they are. Another 0-5 home defeat that’s 3 this season and still no new owner ...... this could have have so easily been us .
So we are not doing that bad after all ... if you add injuries, wonder goals scored against us plus the times we hit bar and post we have come along way and a fine line from going on a very good run .
Think anything we archive will be a bonus this season our work really starts in the summer when LB and SG will have time to build a squad and have a proper pre season .
You don’t undo 4/5 years of cost cutting and poor ownership in 5 months
33
Comments
They've been cutting costs since July and haven't had a manager since November.
Trying to portray this season as anything other than a failure is laughable.
We on the the other hand are severely under achieving constantly and there is obviously something wrong somewhere with the set up but it’s not because of finances .
To compare us "only to Wigan" is as ignorant as comparing us only to anyone one else.
If we were fielding 3 or 4 teenagers or short term contracts like Ledley every week you might have an argument. Because that's what Wigan have been doing.
Are they all bad players or is the manager not getting enough from them?
I'm not in the Bowyer out camp and I think he probably should be given the chance at a proper transfer window (without wage cap) and a proper pre-season to see what can be achieved.
Notwithstanding this - I think we should be doing better that we are given resources available.I also think that LB would galvanise the fanbase a little more if he would say similar on a consistent basis. I do not see how he can constantly state in post match interviews that we should be doing better.....and then say that we are over achieving?!?
(Just to highlight how badly the dropped)
Given that the previous version was thrown out, my assumption would be that any version 2.0 would need to be much less of a blunt tool and more suitable to sustainability against each club's circumstances (be that % of turnover or something else).
Wigan are not a like for like comparison and neither, for different reasons, are Hull who also came down with us.
We've had a unique set of issues, challenges and opportunities and Bowyer and Sandgaard should be judged in light of those.
Sandgaard has a long term plan and he sees Bowyer as part of that, at least for now, otherwise he would have sacked him.
PS can we have more Shakespeare and fewer repeat threads attacking/defending Sandgaard's decision to keep Bowyer on.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/eng_div_2/9422353.stm
A boot room in South East London
Ged Roddy, Steve Gallen and Steve Avory stand over a cauldron
Gallen BOWYER
ALLBOWYER