Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
2022 January transfer window thread - Non Charlton, other transfers (D Day p52)
Comments
-
you've seen him play regularly have you ? .. stick to writing your pretentious previews and write what you know aboutSage said:
Because he’s crap. We need players better than the options we have or at least the same level as Washington and Stockley.Lincsaddick said:
why ? .. we urgently need a striker and it doesn't look as if there is one coming in soon (if ever) .. as I wrote SHORT TERM at leastRedhenry said:would have been pretty annoyed if we signed him
11 -
-
Chill out.Lincsaddick said:
you've seen him play regularly have you ? .. stick to writing your pretentious previews and write what you know aboutSage said:
Because he’s crap. We need players better than the options we have or at least the same level as Washington and Stockley.Lincsaddick said:
why ? .. we urgently need a striker and it doesn't look as if there is one coming in soon (if ever) .. as I wrote SHORT TERM at leastRedhenry said:would have been pretty annoyed if we signed him4 -
fuck offJ BLOCK said:
Chill out.Lincsaddick said:
you've seen him play regularly have you ? .. stick to writing your pretentious previews and write what you know aboutSage said:
Because he’s crap. We need players better than the options we have or at least the same level as Washington and Stockley.Lincsaddick said:
why ? .. we urgently need a striker and it doesn't look as if there is one coming in soon (if ever) .. as I wrote SHORT TERM at leastRedhenry said:would have been pretty annoyed if we signed him
1 -
Go to bed mateLincsaddick said:
fuck offJ BLOCK said:
Chill out.Lincsaddick said:
you've seen him play regularly have you ? .. stick to writing your pretentious previews and write what you know aboutSage said:
Because he’s crap. We need players better than the options we have or at least the same level as Washington and Stockley.Lincsaddick said:
why ? .. we urgently need a striker and it doesn't look as if there is one coming in soon (if ever) .. as I wrote SHORT TERM at leastRedhenry said:would have been pretty annoyed if we signed him2 -
do I know you ? .. there are far too many nosey sniping dickheads on here lately and you're one .. is DD your bra size or EE ?DDOUBLEE said:
Go to bed mateLincsaddick said:
fuck offJ BLOCK said:
Chill out.Lincsaddick said:
you've seen him play regularly have you ? .. stick to writing your pretentious previews and write what you know aboutSage said:
Because he’s crap. We need players better than the options we have or at least the same level as Washington and Stockley.Lincsaddick said:
why ? .. we urgently need a striker and it doesn't look as if there is one coming in soon (if ever) .. as I wrote SHORT TERM at leastRedhenry said:would have been pretty annoyed if we signed him5 -
anyway .. Josh Magennis to Wigan, that was already mooted on here .. gives Wigan a very strong set of strikers .. quite a few L1 clubs bringing players in .. Plymouth, MK Dons, Lincoln, Crewe, Bolton1
-
League One ins (correct as of yesterday?):
- Accrington: x1 loan
- AFC Wimbledon: x1 loan
- Bolton: x2 perm, x1 loan
- Burton: x1 perm
- Cambridge: x1 loan
- Charlton: none
- Cheltenham: x3 perm, x2 loan
- Crewe: none
- Doncaster: x1 perm
- Fleetwood: x3 perm
- Gillingham: x1 loan
- Ipswich: none
- Lincoln: x1 perm, x1 loan
- MKD: x1 loan
- Morecambe: x2 loan
- Oxford: none
- Plymouth: x1 perm
- Portsmouth: none
- Rotherham: none
- Sheff Wed: none
- Shrewsbury: x1 loan
- Sunderland: x1 perm
- Wigan: none
- Wycombe: none
Almost halfway through the window and we are one of nine clubs without any sort of incoming so far alongside Crewe, Ipswich, Oxford, Portsmouth, Rotherham, Sheff Wed, Wigan and Wycombe.
Of the entire league of 24 teams, only eight clubs have a permanent transfer: Bolton, Burton, Cheltenham, Doncaster, Fleetwood, Lincoln, Plymouth, Sunderland
https://d3d4football.com/league-one-two-transfers/
1 -
great stats .. :however, Lincoln have signed 2 on loan, no perms as far as I know .. both came from Swansea .. I am told that Morgan Whiittaker, one of the loanees looks like a right good catch..Callumcafc said:League One ins (correct as of yesterday?):
- Accrington: x1 loan
- AFC Wimbledon: x1 loan
- Bolton: x2 perm, x1 loan
- Burton: x1 perm
- Cambridge: x1 loan
- Charlton: none
- Cheltenham: x3 perm, x2 loan
- Crewe: none
- Doncaster: x1 perm
- Fleetwood: x3 perm
- Gillingham: x1 loan
- Ipswich: none
- Lincoln: x1 perm, x1 loan
- MKD: x1 loan
- Morecambe: x2 loan
- Oxford: none
- Plymouth: x1 perm
- Portsmouth: none
- Rotherham: none
- Sheff Wed: none
- Shrewsbury: x1 loan
- Sunderland: x1 perm
- Wigan: none
- Wycombe: none
Almost halfway through the window and we are one of nine clubs without any sort of incoming so far alongside Crewe, Ipswich, Oxford, Portsmouth, Rotherham, Sheff Wed, Wigan and Wycombe.
Of the entire league of 24 teams, only eight clubs have a permanent transfer: Bolton, Burton, Cheltenham, Doncaster, Fleetwood, Lincoln, Plymouth, Sunderland
https://d3d4football.com/league-one-two-transfers/
the lack of perm deals must indicate how little money there is to spend down in the lower divisions .. the pandemic and closed grounds has cost clubs loads of cash .. also, is the quality of available players up to scratch ?0 - Sponsored links:
-
The website I pulled from has Liam Cullen listed as a permanent but I see it's actually a loan deal. I didn't cross check every transfer, I assumed the website source would be right. My mistake. :-)Lincsaddick said:
great stats .. :however, Lincoln have signed 2 on loan, no perms as far as I know .. both came from Swansea .. I am told that Morgan Whiittaker, one of the loanees looks like a right good catchCallumcafc said:League One ins (correct as of yesterday?):
- Accrington: x1 loan
- AFC Wimbledon: x1 loan
- Bolton: x2 perm, x1 loan
- Burton: x1 perm
- Cambridge: x1 loan
- Charlton: none
- Cheltenham: x3 perm, x2 loan
- Crewe: none
- Doncaster: x1 perm
- Fleetwood: x3 perm
- Gillingham: x1 loan
- Ipswich: none
- Lincoln: x1 perm, x1 loan
- MKD: x1 loan
- Morecambe: x2 loan
- Oxford: none
- Plymouth: x1 perm
- Portsmouth: none
- Rotherham: none
- Sheff Wed: none
- Shrewsbury: x1 loan
- Sunderland: x1 perm
- Wigan: none
- Wycombe: none
Almost halfway through the window and we are one of nine clubs without any sort of incoming so far alongside Crewe, Ipswich, Oxford, Portsmouth, Rotherham, Sheff Wed, Wigan and Wycombe.
Of the entire league of 24 teams, only eight clubs have a permanent transfer: Bolton, Burton, Cheltenham, Doncaster, Fleetwood, Lincoln, Plymouth, Sunderland
https://d3d4football.com/league-one-two-transfers/0 -
no mistake, you're quoting a source .. remarkable how few errors are made by these compilers .. ALSO, I saw the name CULLEN and thought w t f is he going there for lolCallumcafc said:
The website I pulled from has Liam Cullen listed as a permanent but I see it's actually a loan deal. I didn't cross check every transfer, I assumed the website source would be right. My mistake. :-)Lincsaddick said:
great stats .. :however, Lincoln have signed 2 on loan, no perms as far as I know .. both came from Swansea .. I am told that Morgan Whiittaker, one of the loanees looks like a right good catchCallumcafc said:League One ins (correct as of yesterday?):
- Accrington: x1 loan
- AFC Wimbledon: x1 loan
- Bolton: x2 perm, x1 loan
- Burton: x1 perm
- Cambridge: x1 loan
- Charlton: none
- Cheltenham: x3 perm, x2 loan
- Crewe: none
- Doncaster: x1 perm
- Fleetwood: x3 perm
- Gillingham: x1 loan
- Ipswich: none
- Lincoln: x1 perm, x1 loan
- MKD: x1 loan
- Morecambe: x2 loan
- Oxford: none
- Plymouth: x1 perm
- Portsmouth: none
- Rotherham: none
- Sheff Wed: none
- Shrewsbury: x1 loan
- Sunderland: x1 perm
- Wigan: none
- Wycombe: none
Almost halfway through the window and we are one of nine clubs without any sort of incoming so far alongside Crewe, Ipswich, Oxford, Portsmouth, Rotherham, Sheff Wed, Wigan and Wycombe.
Of the entire league of 24 teams, only eight clubs have a permanent transfer: Bolton, Burton, Cheltenham, Doncaster, Fleetwood, Lincoln, Plymouth, Sunderland
https://d3d4football.com/league-one-two-transfers/0 -
Yes, seen him enough to know the level he’ll now be playing at is his true level. His only really been successful in England in League Two bar one half decent season last year. Doesn’t make him a good player or anywhere near the standard we should be going for.Lincsaddick said:
you've seen him play regularly have you ? .. stick to writing your pretentious previews and write what you know aboutSage said:
Because he’s crap. We need players better than the options we have or at least the same level as Washington and Stockley.Lincsaddick said:
why ? .. we urgently need a striker and it doesn't look as if there is one coming in soon (if ever) .. as I wrote SHORT TERM at leastRedhenry said:would have been pretty annoyed if we signed him
Notice whenever anyone goes against your opinions, you have nothing to back yourself up except insults.
Maybe take some of your own advice for a change and stick to writing something you actually know about, you sad, sad man.9 -
You could have just said its the same every day then 🤣Chunes said:
1 -
People did this all through summer to try and escape the fact our recruitment wasn't good enough.Callumcafc said:League One ins (correct as of yesterday?):
- Accrington: x1 loan
- AFC Wimbledon: x1 loan
- Bolton: x2 perm, x1 loan
- Burton: x1 perm
- Cambridge: x1 loan
- Charlton: none
- Cheltenham: x3 perm, x2 loan
- Crewe: none
- Doncaster: x1 perm
- Fleetwood: x3 perm
- Gillingham: x1 loan
- Ipswich: none
- Lincoln: x1 perm, x1 loan
- MKD: x1 loan
- Morecambe: x2 loan
- Oxford: none
- Plymouth: x1 perm
- Portsmouth: none
- Rotherham: none
- Sheff Wed: none
- Shrewsbury: x1 loan
- Sunderland: x1 perm
- Wigan: none
- Wycombe: none
Almost halfway through the window and we are one of nine clubs without any sort of incoming so far alongside Crewe, Ipswich, Oxford, Portsmouth, Rotherham, Sheff Wed, Wigan and Wycombe.
Of the entire league of 24 teams, only eight clubs have a permanent transfer: Bolton, Burton, Cheltenham, Doncaster, Fleetwood, Lincoln, Plymouth, Sunderland
https://d3d4football.com/league-one-two-transfers/
Stop trying to excuse poor performance.1 -
Not excusing anything - trying to present some facts without an opinion attached.SELR_addicks said:
People did this all through summer to try and escape the fact our recruitment wasn't good enough.Callumcafc said:League One ins (correct as of yesterday?):
- Accrington: x1 loan
- AFC Wimbledon: x1 loan
- Bolton: x2 perm, x1 loan
- Burton: x1 perm
- Cambridge: x1 loan
- Charlton: none
- Cheltenham: x3 perm, x2 loan
- Crewe: none
- Doncaster: x1 perm
- Fleetwood: x3 perm
- Gillingham: x1 loan
- Ipswich: none
- Lincoln: x1 perm, x1 loan
- MKD: x1 loan
- Morecambe: x2 loan
- Oxford: none
- Plymouth: x1 perm
- Portsmouth: none
- Rotherham: none
- Sheff Wed: none
- Shrewsbury: x1 loan
- Sunderland: x1 perm
- Wigan: none
- Wycombe: none
Almost halfway through the window and we are one of nine clubs without any sort of incoming so far alongside Crewe, Ipswich, Oxford, Portsmouth, Rotherham, Sheff Wed, Wigan and Wycombe.
Of the entire league of 24 teams, only eight clubs have a permanent transfer: Bolton, Burton, Cheltenham, Doncaster, Fleetwood, Lincoln, Plymouth, Sunderland
https://d3d4football.com/league-one-two-transfers/
Stop trying to excuse poor performance.2 -
Nah it's my favourite grime artist, BudabupbupLincsaddick said:
do I know you ? .. there are far too many nosey sniping dickheads on here lately and you're one .. is DD your bra size or EE ?DDOUBLEE said:
Go to bed mateLincsaddick said:
fuck offJ BLOCK said:
Chill out.Lincsaddick said:
you've seen him play regularly have you ? .. stick to writing your pretentious previews and write what you know aboutSage said:
Because he’s crap. We need players better than the options we have or at least the same level as Washington and Stockley.Lincsaddick said:
why ? .. we urgently need a striker and it doesn't look as if there is one coming in soon (if ever) .. as I wrote SHORT TERM at leastRedhenry said:would have been pretty annoyed if we signed him1 -
.1
-
0
- Sponsored links:
-
Perhaps missing out on him and Louis Barry wasn’t so bad after all.Richard J said:2 -
Richard J said:
Might be one to keep an eye on. Didn't get many minutes under the Cowley's.0 -
Lincsaddick.and Hemmings sitting in a tree, K-I-S-S-I-N-G 😜Lincsaddick said:
you've seen him play regularly have you ? .. stick to writing your pretentious previews and write what you know aboutSage said:
Because he’s crap. We need players better than the options we have or at least the same level as Washington and Stockley.Lincsaddick said:
why ? .. we urgently need a striker and it doesn't look as if there is one coming in soon (if ever) .. as I wrote SHORT TERM at leastRedhenry said:would have been pretty annoyed if we signed him0 -
Love that response.Maccn05 said:
Not really true though there’s been 77 incoming transfers made already in League One. We account of 0% of them.Isawsummersplay said:As it is for most teams.
"We're just like everyone else.....no-one's bringing in players"
"Errr.......take a look as I think some clubs have - just not us"
Love it.
2 -
Anwar El Ghazi has gone the other way, on loan to Everton from Villakillerandflash said:Confirmed Wood to Newcastle and Digne to Villa, both £25m
0 -
Where did you get 77 from? That's an average of 3.34 transfers per side spread out across the other 23 teams in our league.Maccn05 said:
Not really true though there’s been 77 incoming transfers made already in League One. We account of 0% of them.Isawsummersplay said:As it is for most teams.
The list I posted above clearly has some errors in it / slow to update by a day or so but I count 25 which is a massive difference to 77.0 -
Much friendlier on the other thread.2
-
I'd like to bet no one within the Burnley camp feels that way, least of all Sean Dyche. They've lost their main striker to a relegation rival at a time when their top scorer Cornet is away at AFCON.North Lower Neil said:
Burnley have done well there hpldomg out for the release clause - he's not been as good this season as others, for a start.killerandflash said:Confirmed Wood to Newcastle and Digne to Villa, both £25m
4 good years out of him, £10m profit at 30.
Need to replace him though.
If Burnley go down they'll lose a few more players (Cornet, Tarkowski, McNeil etc) and i think they'll struggle to get back up.0 -
Jonson Clarke-Harris is leaving Peterborough in the window. Sunderland look like getting him. Sandgaard should go all out in getting JCH. If we can get him and a sharp goal poacher the rest of the squad will feel it worth running for an hour and a half twice a week. Currently they do not have that.
1 -
If you were him though, what possible reason would you have to choose us over them? They can probably pay him more and they're in the promotion hunt.ValleyOfTears said:Jonson Clarke-Harris is leaving Peterborough in the window. Sunderland look like getting him. Sandgaard should go all out in getting JCH. If we can get him and a sharp goal poacher the rest of the squad will feel it worth running for an hour and a half twice a week. Currently they do not have that.
Peterborough have denied the rumours though and even if they did sell, i think the price they'd want for him would rule out a league one club. MacAnthony won't sell cheap.1
https://youtu.be/JubiECulV0o
https://youtu.be/RKlZkwc6tQg
