Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Chuks Aneke - speculation re 2023/24 season (p60)
Comments
-
talalsrightfoot said:cafcfan1990 said:talalsrightfoot said:Covered End said:talalsrightfoot said:Covered End said:I never thought Stuwall could be beaten but talalsrightfoot has absolutely smashed him.
He must be a WUM and reeled us all in.
Bring your own tracing paper crayola and ill explain it to you
You are talking absolute rubbish and I've not seen one person that agrees with you.
Either you are right and everyone who has read this on CL is wrong, or you are wrong and everyone that has read this on CL is right.
If we spend £500K on Chucks and £250K on another player we have spent £250K more.
You can't pay a player £500K and not pay it through the "books" that is breaking the EFL rules (amongst others).
Are you proposing that our investors just start paying players willy nilly with no accountability and not through the "books" , it's too stupid for words and as you've been pushing this nonsense all day I can't fathom your motivation for doing so, unless it's a wind up?
Pay off the books ? Who on earth has said that. I said that we COULD pay him from finances or out of owners pockets which reduce the wage bill on a month by month basis. We then use the money saved from the wage budget to sign a cheaper player. The difference would be the money saved and we can repay the initial layout.
Ita funny you have to go personal.You must be a WUM, you can’t genuinely believe that paying circa 500k to save 10k a month is good business?
As for getting personal, didn’t you call me dense earlier?
You crying about it ? LolI’ll survive pal
I hate this time of year. Bloody schools shut and kids like Talal have way too much time on their hands. Roll in September0 -
talalsrightfoot said:cafcfan1990 said:talalsrightfoot said:Covered End said:talalsrightfoot said:Covered End said:I never thought Stuwall could be beaten but talalsrightfoot has absolutely smashed him.
He must be a WUM and reeled us all in.
Bring your own tracing paper crayola and ill explain it to you
You are talking absolute rubbish and I've not seen one person that agrees with you.
Either you are right and everyone who has read this on CL is wrong, or you are wrong and everyone that has read this on CL is right.
If we spend £500K on Chucks and £250K on another player we have spent £250K more.
You can't pay a player £500K and not pay it through the "books" that is breaking the EFL rules (amongst others).
Are you proposing that our investors just start paying players willy nilly with no accountability and not through the "books" , it's too stupid for words and as you've been pushing this nonsense all day I can't fathom your motivation for doing so, unless it's a wind up?
Pay off the books ? Who on earth has said that. I said that we COULD pay him from finances or out of owners pockets which reduce the wage bill on a month by month basis. We then use the money saved from the wage budget to sign a cheaper player. The difference would be the money saved and we can repay the initial layout.
Ita funny you have to go personal.You must be a WUM, you can’t genuinely believe that paying circa 500k to save 10k a month is good business?
As for getting personal, didn’t you call me dense earlier?
You crying about it ? Lol0 -
I’m going to close this thread for a bit, talal’s account will change soon and I want to make clear he’s not banned, he’s asked for it to be closed8
This discussion has been closed.