I thought we keep being told we can't play 442 as the midfield will be ripped to shreds. So wingbacks aren't the answer either then.
What you on about.. Nobody is playing 442. Both teams have 3 midfielders
I was making the point that posters on here are wanting to go back to 442 but it being pointed out that going back to the "old" system wouldn't work as the midfield would be over run.....but it seems that we are being overrun playing with wingbacks.
Jeez......not hard to see what I was saying.
So you're saying that if we're getting overrun with a 3-man midfield... then we should try a 2-man.
This will be a shock to many but the Liverpool match just about shades this one in terms of quality. Although saying that, Man U wouldn't look out of place in our game
I thought we keep being told we can't play 442 as the midfield will be ripped to shreds. So wingbacks aren't the answer either then.
What you on about.. Nobody is playing 442. Both teams have 3 midfielders
I was making the point that posters on here are wanting to go back to 442 but it being pointed out that going back to the "old" system wouldn't work as the midfield would be over run.....but it seems that we are being overrun playing with wingbacks.
Jeez......not hard to see what I was saying.
So you're saying that if we're getting overrun with a 3-man midfield... then we should try a 2-man.
I can see why I was confused.
No. Try again
I was saying that we were told that we can't go to 442 as we would be over run in midfield. But playing 3 in midfield isnt working either.
I thought we keep being told we can't play 442 as the midfield will be ripped to shreds. So wingbacks aren't the answer either then.
What you on about.. Nobody is playing 442. Both teams have 3 midfielders
I was making the point that posters on here are wanting to go back to 442 but it being pointed out that going back to the "old" system wouldn't work as the midfield would be over run.....but it seems that we are being overrun playing with wingbacks.
Jeez......not hard to see what I was saying.
So you're saying that if we're getting overrun with a 3-man midfield... then we should try a 2-man.
I can see why I was confused.
Also 442 means 4 in midfield. Or arent wingers/wide players allowed to move. Perhaps in netball or subuteo they dont.
I thought we keep being told we can't play 442 as the midfield will be ripped to shreds. So wingbacks aren't the answer either then.
What you on about.. Nobody is playing 442. Both teams have 3 midfielders
I was making the point that posters on here are wanting to go back to 442 but it being pointed out that going back to the "old" system wouldn't work as the midfield would be over run.....but it seems that we are being overrun playing with wingbacks.
Jeez......not hard to see what I was saying.
So you're saying that if we're getting overrun with a 3-man midfield... then we should try a 2-man.
I can see why I was confused.
No. Try again
I was saying that we were told that we can't go to 442 as we would be over run in midfield. But playing 3 in midfield isnt working either.
I thought we keep being told we can't play 442 as the midfield will be ripped to shreds. So wingbacks aren't the answer either then.
What you on about.. Nobody is playing 442. Both teams have 3 midfielders
I was making the point that posters on here are wanting to go back to 442 but it being pointed out that going back to the "old" system wouldn't work as the midfield would be over run.....but it seems that we are being overrun playing with wingbacks.
Jeez......not hard to see what I was saying.
So you're saying that if we're getting overrun with a 3-man midfield... then we should try a 2-man.
I can see why I was confused.
Also 442 means 4 in midfield. Or arent wingers/wide players allowed to move. Perhaps in netball or subuteo they dont.
I thought we keep being told we can't play 442 as the midfield will be ripped to shreds. So wingbacks aren't the answer either then.
What you on about.. Nobody is playing 442. Both teams have 3 midfielders
I was making the point that posters on here are wanting to go back to 442 but it being pointed out that going back to the "old" system wouldn't work as the midfield would be over run.....but it seems that we are being overrun playing with wingbacks.
Jeez......not hard to see what I was saying.
So you're saying that if we're getting overrun with a 3-man midfield... then we should try a 2-man.
I can see why I was confused.
No. Try again
I was saying that we were told that we can't go to 442 as we would be over run in midfield. But playing 3 in midfield isnt working either.
This will be a shock to many but the Liverpool match just about shades this one in terms of quality. Although saying that, Man U wouldn't look out of place in our game
Would love to be reading GolfRedDevil’s posts on ManUre Life tonight :-)
I thought we keep being told we can't play 442 as the midfield will be ripped to shreds. So wingbacks aren't the answer either then.
What you on about.. Nobody is playing 442. Both teams have 3 midfielders
I was making the point that posters on here are wanting to go back to 442 but it being pointed out that going back to the "old" system wouldn't work as the midfield would be over run.....but it seems that we are being overrun playing with wingbacks.
Jeez......not hard to see what I was saying.
So you're saying that if we're getting overrun with a 3-man midfield... then we should try a 2-man.
I can see why I was confused.
Also 442 means 4 in midfield. Or arent wingers/wide players allowed to move. Perhaps in netball or subuteo they dont.
We definitely have a subuteo goalkeeper!!
A Subbuteo goalkeeper is more likely to come off his line.
This will be a shock to many but the Liverpool match just about shades this one in terms of quality. Although saying that, Man U wouldn't look out of place in our game
Would love to be reading GolfRedDevil’s posts on ManUre Life tonight :-)
I am listening to Clinton Morrison on SSN on this game. Still cannot stand this man
I thought we keep being told we can't play 442 as the midfield will be ripped to shreds. So wingbacks aren't the answer either then.
What you on about.. Nobody is playing 442. Both teams have 3 midfielders
I was making the point that posters on here are wanting to go back to 442 but it being pointed out that going back to the "old" system wouldn't work as the midfield would be over run.....but it seems that we are being overrun playing with wingbacks.
Jeez......not hard to see what I was saying.
So you're saying that if we're getting overrun with a 3-man midfield... then we should try a 2-man.
I can see why I was confused.
No. Try again
I was saying that we were told that we can't go to 442 as we would be over run in midfield. But playing 3 in midfield isnt working either.
Maybe try 4 or 5......
What formation do you suggest?
I dont think it's the formation that's the problem. Moreso the players & the manager.
We may line up as 3-5-2 but that’s not what we play. We play 3 CB with a RB, a defensive Midfielder with 2 other geezers wandering aimlessly about, plus a deep left winger bringing a threat from a distance, and a big bloke and a runner up front. Not sure how you would adequately explain that, maybe a 3 and 1 over there to the right - 1 with 2 looking about somewhere and 1 on the left side - 2 formation
I thought we keep being told we can't play 442 as the midfield will be ripped to shreds. So wingbacks aren't the answer either then.
What you on about.. Nobody is playing 442. Both teams have 3 midfielders
I was making the point that posters on here are wanting to go back to 442 but it being pointed out that going back to the "old" system wouldn't work as the midfield would be over run.....but it seems that we are being overrun playing with wingbacks.
Jeez......not hard to see what I was saying.
So you're saying that if we're getting overrun with a 3-man midfield... then we should try a 2-man.
I can see why I was confused.
No. Try again
I was saying that we were told that we can't go to 442 as we would be over run in midfield. But playing 3 in midfield isnt working either.
Maybe try 4 or 5......
What formation do you suggest?
11.0.0 in front of the goal
Nah you need to fit in the 8 nippy strikers somewhere.
Comments
I can see why I was confused.
Post update
Hand ball by Sean Clare (Charlton Athletic).
Post update
Jack Lankester (Cambridge United) wins a free kick in the defensive half.
I was saying that we were told that we can't go to 442 as we would be over run in midfield. But playing 3 in midfield isnt working either.
Maybe try 4 or 5......
Post update
Alex Gilbey (Charlton Athletic) wins a free kick in the defensive half.
Post update
Foul by Liam O'Neil (Cambridge United).
Post update
Jayden Stockley (Charlton Athletic) wins a free kick on the left wing.
Post update
Foul by Jubril Okedina (Cambridge United).
Post update
Corner, Cambridge United. Conceded by Jayden Stockley.
And his throwing would be better, too.
Post update
Attempt missed. Jayden Stockley (Charlton Athletic) header from very close range misses to the left. Assisted by Albie Morgan with a cross.
Post update
Attempt blocked. Wes Hoolahan (Cambridge United) left footed shot from outside the box is blocked.
Not a shirt pull surely?