Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

World Cup 2026 - USA/Canada/Mexico

16061626365

Comments

  • follett
    follett Posts: 1,239
    I would not be surprised if you saw somebody score 10 in a game.
    There will possibly be games where teams could almost reach 85% possession.  The group stages could be more interesting when the minnows are playing each other.
    Middlesbrough nearly reached 85% possession when they lost to us
  • ElfsborgAddick
    ElfsborgAddick Posts: 30,084
    cafctom said:
    cafctom said:
    I’m flying to America next week, starting in Chicago…the first of ten cities on my trip.

    Yes, there will be parts of it that will be a ballache, too expensive, too hot, too corporate etc. 

    But it’s an event that comes around every four years, and life’s too short to find the negative in everything. 

    Bring it on.
    For the amount of dough it's costing you I hope you have a bloody good time.
    It’s an expensive trip, but genuinely could be a lot worse.

    Tickets, accommodation, flights all in this is setting me back about £5-6k for a three week trip. 

    If we get to the Final and I end up going back out for it then that number doubles. Even as a member of the England Supporters Club. Thats the part that I find is really disgusting from a price perspective, because they actually take the money off of you (£3k for a ticket) before the tournament and hold onto it!

    But that factor aside, it is doable to make the rest of it seem reasonable. I literally pressed the pause button on my TV when Englands name came out the hat so I could start booking flights, hotels etc on free cancellation before anything surged too much. 

    Whilst this is not loose change, I would have thought this would have been a bit more.  However, for major tournaments around the world nothing is cheap.
    I hope you come back thinking it was money well spent.
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 66,326
    England squad numbers .. seems Tuchel has set his first choices ?

    England squad numbers: Jude Bellingham gets No 10 shirt for World Cup - BBC Sport

    1 Jordan Pickford
    2 Ezri Konsa
    3 Nico O’Reilly
    4 Declan Rice
    5 John Stones
    6 Marc Guehi
    7 Bukayo Saka
    8 Elliot Anderson
    9 Harry Kane
    10 Jude Bellingham
    11 Marcus Rashford
    12 Tino Livramento
    13 Dean Henderson
    14 Jordan Henderson
    15 Dan Burn
    16 Kobbie Mainoo
    17 Morgan Rogers
    18 Anthony Gordon
    19 Ollie Watkins
    20 Noni Madueke
    21 Eberechi Eze
    22 Ivan Toney
    23 James Trafford
    24 Reece James
    25 Djed Spence
    26 Jarell Quansah
  • Chris_from_Sidcup
    Chris_from_Sidcup Posts: 37,335
    I would not be surprised if you saw somebody score 10 in a game.
    There will possibly be games where teams could almost reach 85% possession.  The group stages could be more interesting when the minnows are playing each other.
    There are obviously going to be some one-sided games but 10 is probably pushing it a bit much. Brazil put 6 past Panama in a friendly the other night and i'd expect us to do similar if we are bothered about pushing for goals.
  • Chris_from_Sidcup
    Chris_from_Sidcup Posts: 37,335
    Overnight Haiti (who are in Scotland's group) beat New Zealand (who we play in a friendly on Saturday night) 4-0 in Miami. 

    NZ are obviously one of the worst teams in the tournament, but that win for Haiti could be a warning for Scotland that Haiti are not going to be pushovers.
  • ElfsborgAddick
    ElfsborgAddick Posts: 30,084
    Overnight Haiti (who are in Scotland's group) beat New Zealand (who we play in a friendly on Saturday night) 4-0 in Miami. 

    NZ are obviously one of the worst teams in the tournament, but that win for Haiti could be a warning for Scotland that Haiti are not going to be pushovers.
    Scotland never play pushovers :)
  • cafcnick1992
    cafcnick1992 Posts: 7,743
    The stadium (BMO Field) in Toronto is genuinely shite
    The Canadian bird i was seeing a few years ago lived on Lakeshore Boulevard, so you could see the stadium whenever we went into town on the Gardiner Expressway. Stunned to hear it was hosting world cup games - from memory it looked about the size of Loftus Road 🤣 
    I lived in Liberty Village which is just down the road from BMO Field so went to a few CFL and MLS games. As you say, proper shite stadium
  • jimmymelrose
    jimmymelrose Posts: 10,274
    MrOneLung said:
    And Germany has had 2 world cups and 2 Euros since 1974

    And France has 2 world cups and 3 euros in their history
    France HAVE (British English) won 2 world cups and TWO euros in their history. Please don’t add fuel to the fire.
  • jimmymelrose
    jimmymelrose Posts: 10,274
    Mametz said:
    fenaddick said:
    Mametz said:
    Normally I look forward to the World Cup finals but not this time. Why has the USA got it again so soon after having it before? Why has it been expanded to so many teams? Extended half times, so as to pack in as much advertising revenue as possible. Etc, etc, etc. 

    I really can’t be arsed to watch this overblown farce.
    So soon? It's been 32 years!! For reference, the shortest gap is 16 years (Mexico 1970 & 1986). Germany was also 32 years
    Mametz said:
    Normally I look forward to the World Cup finals but not this time. Why has the USA got it again so soon after having it before? Why has it been expanded to so many teams? Extended half times, so as to pack in as much advertising revenue as possible. Etc, etc, etc. 

    I really can’t be arsed to watch this overblown farce.
    Much as I disagree with another totalitarian 😉 state like the USA being given most of the world cup, it's Mexico's third bite of the apple, the last being only sixteen years after the first. 
    Thanks for both of your replies. 

    I can accept that the America’s have right to host the World Cup, given the enthusiasm of the fans and the success of teams such as Brazil, Argentina and Uruguayan in previous World Cups. But the USA? It is not one of the two most popular sports in that country. It may be 32 years since The USA hosted the tournament but it is 36 years since Italy, three times winners, hosted the tournament, 44 years since Spain, former winners, have hosted the tournament and 60 years since England, former winners, hosted the tournament. In all of those countries there is greater enthusiasm for football than the USA. 


    I get your point but they rotate the tournament across different continents and you can't host a world cup in North America without the US involved.

    The last 5 world cups have been Africa, South America, Europe, Asia and now North America.
    In that case, shouldn't it go to Australia?  There is no rule at FIFA - only money counts.
  • jimmymelrose
    jimmymelrose Posts: 10,274
    edited June 3
    SDAddick said:
    England will play in white/white against Croatia (blue/blue) & Ghana (yellow/black) and will play in red/navy against Panama (white/white).






    Thanks Callum, this is the kind of wonkery I come to this thread for!

    Glad that beautiful red kit gets a run out. I can't believe we're just over a week away!
    It would be beautiful without the Scottish / French navy blue. 

  • Sponsored links:



  • Chris_from_Sidcup
    Chris_from_Sidcup Posts: 37,335
    Mametz said:
    fenaddick said:
    Mametz said:
    Normally I look forward to the World Cup finals but not this time. Why has the USA got it again so soon after having it before? Why has it been expanded to so many teams? Extended half times, so as to pack in as much advertising revenue as possible. Etc, etc, etc. 

    I really can’t be arsed to watch this overblown farce.
    So soon? It's been 32 years!! For reference, the shortest gap is 16 years (Mexico 1970 & 1986). Germany was also 32 years
    Mametz said:
    Normally I look forward to the World Cup finals but not this time. Why has the USA got it again so soon after having it before? Why has it been expanded to so many teams? Extended half times, so as to pack in as much advertising revenue as possible. Etc, etc, etc. 

    I really can’t be arsed to watch this overblown farce.
    Much as I disagree with another totalitarian 😉 state like the USA being given most of the world cup, it's Mexico's third bite of the apple, the last being only sixteen years after the first. 
    Thanks for both of your replies. 

    I can accept that the America’s have right to host the World Cup, given the enthusiasm of the fans and the success of teams such as Brazil, Argentina and Uruguayan in previous World Cups. But the USA? It is not one of the two most popular sports in that country. It may be 32 years since The USA hosted the tournament but it is 36 years since Italy, three times winners, hosted the tournament, 44 years since Spain, former winners, have hosted the tournament and 60 years since England, former winners, hosted the tournament. In all of those countries there is greater enthusiasm for football than the USA. 


    I get your point but they rotate the tournament across different continents and you can't host a world cup in North America without the US involved.

    The last 5 world cups have been Africa, South America, Europe, Asia and now North America.
    In that case, shouldn't it go to Australia?  There is no rule at FIFA - only money counts.
    I don't think Australia has enough suitable stadiums to host it. 
  • MrOneLung
    MrOneLung Posts: 27,657
    and they are part of the Asian confederation
  • jimmymelrose
    jimmymelrose Posts: 10,274
    Overnight Haiti (who are in Scotland's group) beat New Zealand (who we play in a friendly on Saturday night) 4-0 in Miami. 

    NZ are obviously one of the worst teams in the tournament, but that win for Haiti could be a warning for Scotland that Haiti are not going to be pushovers.
    Friendlies mean nothing. Perhaps NZ were trying out new formations. Perhaps Haiti are simply more acclimatised earlier. It all depends on the attitude and approach to friendlies. For some it’s a training session, for others it’s serious preparation.
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 66,326
    MrOneLung said:
    And Germany has had 2 world cups and 2 Euros since 1974

    And France has 2 world cups and 3 euros in their history
    France HAVE (British English) won 2 world cups and TWO euros in their history. Please don’t add fuel to the fire.
    France have hosted three Euros in 1960, 1984 and 2016, which is what the original conversation was about. They won in 1984 and 2000.
  • Elthamaddick
    Elthamaddick Posts: 16,355
    Overnight Haiti (who are in Scotland's group) beat New Zealand (who we play in a friendly on Saturday night) 4-0 in Miami. 

    NZ are obviously one of the worst teams in the tournament, but that win for Haiti could be a warning for Scotland that Haiti are not going to be pushovers.
    Friendlies mean nothing. Perhaps NZ were trying out new formations. Perhaps Haiti are simply more acclimatised earlier. It all depends on the attitude and approach to friendlies. For some it’s a training session, for others it’s serious preparation.
    let's see if all other England fans feel the same when NZ turn us over Saturday night 🤣
  • Chris_from_Sidcup
    Chris_from_Sidcup Posts: 37,335
    Overnight Haiti (who are in Scotland's group) beat New Zealand (who we play in a friendly on Saturday night) 4-0 in Miami. 

    NZ are obviously one of the worst teams in the tournament, but that win for Haiti could be a warning for Scotland that Haiti are not going to be pushovers.
    Friendlies mean nothing. Perhaps NZ were trying out new formations. Perhaps Haiti are simply more acclimatised earlier. It all depends on the attitude and approach to friendlies. For some it’s a training session, for others it’s serious preparation.
    If they're trying out new formations a week before the world cup then they're in a big trouble.
  • ValleyGary
    ValleyGary Posts: 38,554
    Decent little mini doc on YT about a few lads that went to Mexico 86 and just didn’t bother coming home.

    https://youtu.be/9GI6xxaRUvY?si=M4wfFptd1q-UgVMx
  • sam3110
    sam3110 Posts: 23,271
    BMO Field looks properly shit
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 66,326
    edited June 3

    https://youtu.be/VIYj4R-TeT8


    Come on England :- )

  • jimmymelrose
    jimmymelrose Posts: 10,274
    MrOneLung said:
    And Germany has had 2 world cups and 2 Euros since 1974

    And France has 2 world cups and 3 euros in their history
    France HAVE (British English) won 2 world cups and TWO euros in their history. Please don’t add fuel to the fire.
    France have hosted three Euros in 1960, 1984 and 2016, which is what the original conversation was about. They won in 1984 and 2000.
     Maybe it would be better to use either the verb Win or Host, rather then Have.

    But in either case it’s incorrect. They’ve only hosted 1 World Cup.

  • Sponsored links:



  • MrOneLung
    MrOneLung Posts: 27,657
    Which year didn’t happen then 1938 or 1998 ? 
  • AddicksAddict
    AddicksAddict Posts: 16,392
    Chunes said:
    From BBC Sport: 

    "Cristiano Ronaldo will be able to play for Portugal in their opening game at next summer's World Cup finals despite his red card against the Republic of Ireland.

    Violent conduct normally carries a three-match ban but Ronaldo has had the second and third matches suspended for a year."
    Ooooh Mr President, can you please speak to FIFA for me so i can play at your World Cup....


    What a tart. 
  • Blackheathen
    Blackheathen Posts: 6,763
    edited June 3
    Overnight Haiti (who are in Scotland's group) beat New Zealand (who we play in a friendly on Saturday night) 4-0 in Miami. 

    NZ are obviously one of the worst teams in the tournament, but that win for Haiti could be a warning for Scotland that Haiti are not going to be pushovers.
    Friendlies mean nothing. Perhaps NZ were trying out new formations. Perhaps Haiti are simply more acclimatised earlier. It all depends on the attitude and approach to friendlies. For some it’s a training session, for others it’s serious preparation.
    Judging by the very disappointed reation of the NZ Manager after the game I’d say it came in the serious preparation category.  They will have to do much better to even by competitive.  Frail defence and no urgency in attack.
  • jimmymelrose
    jimmymelrose Posts: 10,274
    MrOneLung said:
    Which year didn’t happen then 1938 or 1998 ? 
    1938, lol

    Ooops, sorry.
  • Chris_from_Sidcup
    Chris_from_Sidcup Posts: 37,335
    Just watched a 15 minute youtube video of England players getting out of cars, saying 'you alright' and walking into a hotel and now i'm pumped for the world cup to begin.
  • ValleyGary
    ValleyGary Posts: 38,554
    edited 8:47AM
    Absolutely fuming they got rid of Josh Denzel from Lions Den. This new guy is shocking, zero charisma.
  • Weegie Addick
    Weegie Addick Posts: 17,197
    Absolutely shocking that a Charlton fan would ever watch anything called the Lions’ Den 🤣
  • PragueAddick
    PragueAddick Posts: 22,538
    cafctom said:
    cafctom said:
    I’m flying to America next week, starting in Chicago…the first of ten cities on my trip.

    Yes, there will be parts of it that will be a ballache, too expensive, too hot, too corporate etc. 

    But it’s an event that comes around every four years, and life’s too short to find the negative in everything. 

    Bring it on.
    For the amount of dough it's costing you I hope you have a bloody good time.
    It’s an expensive trip, but genuinely could be a lot worse.

    Tickets, accommodation, flights all in this is setting me back about £5-6k for a three week trip. 

    If we get to the Final and I end up going back out for it then that number doubles. Even as a member of the England Supporters Club. Thats the part that I find is really disgusting from a price perspective, because they actually take the money off of you (£3k for a ticket) before the tournament and hold onto it!

    But that factor aside, it is doable to make the rest of it seem reasonable. I literally pressed the pause button on my TV when Englands name came out the hat so I could start booking flights, hotels etc on free cancellation before anything surged too much. 
    Hats off to you, Tom. Personally I'd love to read your day by day account of the whole thing, not just the footie, on its own thread.
  • KBslittlesis
    KBslittlesis Posts: 9,058
    cafctom said:
    cafctom said:
    I’m flying to America next week, starting in Chicago…the first of ten cities on my trip.

    Yes, there will be parts of it that will be a ballache, too expensive, too hot, too corporate etc. 

    But it’s an event that comes around every four years, and life’s too short to find the negative in everything. 

    Bring it on.
    For the amount of dough it's costing you I hope you have a bloody good time.
    It’s an expensive trip, but genuinely could be a lot worse.

    Tickets, accommodation, flights all in this is setting me back about £5-6k for a three week trip. 

    If we get to the Final and I end up going back out for it then that number doubles. Even as a member of the England Supporters Club. Thats the part that I find is really disgusting from a price perspective, because they actually take the money off of you (£3k for a ticket) before the tournament and hold onto it!

    But that factor aside, it is doable to make the rest of it seem reasonable. I literally pressed the pause button on my TV when Englands name came out the hat so I could start booking flights, hotels etc on free cancellation before anything surged too much. 
    Hats off to you, Tom. Personally I'd love to read your day by day account of the whole thing, not just the footie, on its own thread.
    Ooooh that’s a good idea. G’wan Tom 👍🏼
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 66,326
    edited 12:01PM
    It’s quite straightforward for England who know the paths to the semi final, whichever position they qualify.

    Qualify 3rd
    R32 -> 1st Group K in Kansas City (Portugal)
    R16 -> 1st Group B in Vancouver (Canada / Switzerland) 
    QF -> 1st Group J (Argentina) in Kansas City
    SF in Atlanta

    Qualify 2nd
    R32 -> 2nd Group K in Toronto (Colombia)
    R16 -> 1st Group H in Dallas (Spain)
    QF -> 1st Group D/G in Los Angeles (USA/Belgium)
    SF in Dallas

    Qualify 1st
    R32-> 3rd Group K in Atlanta (as long as 3rd Group K qualified)
    R16 -> 1st Group A in Mexico City (Mexico)
    QF -> 1st Group C in Miami (Brazil)
    SF in Atlanta