If the EFL get their finger out maybe we can welcome the new owner at the Brighton game.
Remember what happened when ESI took over. It got leaked & then everyone was urging the EFL to get a move on as January was fast approaching & we didn't want to miss out on big signings in the January window.
Well......the EFL said "ok then, we sanction the takeover" but forgot to tell the fans that ESI had not passed all of the "fit & proper" test as the source of the money could not be evidenced......and therefore we would be under a transfer embargo !!!!
We've been down this road more than once. I wont believe ANYTHING until actual signings are revealed.
Why sack a manager if you've just agreed to sell the club?
TS was pissed BG went public with his complaints and knowing the new owners will bring in the own man saw no reason not to be petty and exercise his displeasure?
Seems an expensive way to be petty.
Count me in "I don't believe it" camp. Been here too many times with these vague internet rumours.
If it was just Reams saying this then I’d think it was a wind up in typical Reams fashion but it seems it could have legs as @SoundAsa£ and others have heard the same thing. Let’s wait and see.
Why sack a manager if you've just agreed to sell the club?
TS was pissed BG went public with his complaints and knowing the new owners will bring in the own man saw no reason not to be petty and exercise his displeasure?
Seems an expensive way to be petty.
Count me in "I don't believe it" camp. Been here too many times with these vague internet rumours.
Hasn’t there been a rumour of a break clause or one where Sandgaard could get rid of Garner cheap because he failed to meet a target? If that’s true it would make sense that Sandgaard sacked him and the buyers whacked on 50/100k than coming in and having to sack him themselves.
Another possibility is new owners didn’t want to come in and sack the manager as their first action. Sandgaard does it, new owners come in and get to hire their choice.
Why sack a manager if you've just agreed to sell the club?
TS was pissed BG went public with his complaints and knowing the new owners will bring in the own man saw no reason not to be petty and exercise his displeasure?
Seems an expensive way to be petty.
Count me in "I don't believe it" camp. Been here too many times with these vague internet rumours.
Hasn’t there been a rumour of a break clause or one where Sandgaard could get rid of Garner cheap because he failed to meet a target? If that’s true it would make sense that Sandgaard sacked him and the buyers whacked on 50/100k than coming in and having to sack him themselves.
Another possibility is new owners didn’t want to come in and sack the manager as their first action. Sandgaard does it, new owners come in and get to hire their choice.
Maybe. All seems a bit wishful thinking to me though.
And a bit coincidental that just as the majority mood starts to turn towards protest and we see a Sandgaard out banner at a match there’s is a new “takeover imminent rumour”.
I have nothing to go on but my gut, and my gut tells me it’s bollocks. But my gut isn’t always right either.
I think TS absence on social media is a massive indicator that something is going on, I'm just not sure what. Maybe at the Brighton game he walks to the centre circle before kick off, strums a few chords of Addicks to victory and then pulls off his latex mask to reveal he was RD all along and walks down the tunnel pissing himself with laughter.
I think TS absence on social media is a massive indicator that something is going on,.
I wouldn’t read too much into it. He had no history of using social media before launching his Charlton interest, it’s only ever been used for that, and he stopped in May when things were getting more mixed. No guarantee it was even him tweeting (though I suspect it was).
I think TS absence on social media is a massive indicator that something is going on, I'm just not sure what. Maybe at the Brighton game he walks to the centre circle before kick off, strums a few chords of Addicks to victory and then pulls off his latex mask to reveal he was RD all along and walks down the tunnel pissing himself with laughter.
I think TS absence on social media is a massive indicator that something is going on,.
I wouldn’t read too much into it. He had no history of using social media before launching his Charlton interest, it’s only ever been used for that, and he stopped in May when things were getting more mixed. No guarantee it was even him tweeting (though I suspect it was).
Thomas has never used social media at all. Raelynn was behind his Twitter account. It’s doubtful he ever sees or has a true handle on what the mood across social media is, although I’m sure he’s aware now.
I think TS absence on social media is a massive indicator that something is going on,.
I wouldn’t read too much into it. He had no history of using social media before launching his Charlton interest, it’s only ever been used for that, and he stopped in May when things were getting more mixed. No guarantee it was even him tweeting (though I suspect it was).
Thomas has never used social media at all. Raelynn was behind his Twitter account. It’s doubtful he ever sees or has a true handle on what the mood across social media is, although I’m sure he’s aware now.
I think TS absence on social media is a massive indicator that something is going on,.
I wouldn’t read too much into it. He had no history of using social media before launching his Charlton interest, it’s only ever been used for that, and he stopped in May when things were getting more mixed. No guarantee it was even him tweeting (though I suspect it was).
Thomas has never used social media at all. Raelynn was behind his Twitter account. It’s doubtful he ever sees or has a true handle on what the mood across social media is, although I’m sure he’s aware now.
Is that true of his LinkedIn as well?
Not 100% on his LinkedIn but it wouldn’t surprise me.
I think TS absence on social media is a massive indicator that something is going on,.
I wouldn’t read too much into it. He had no history of using social media before launching his Charlton interest, it’s only ever been used for that, and he stopped in May when things were getting more mixed. No guarantee it was even him tweeting (though I suspect it was).
Thomas has never used social media at all. Raelynn was behind his Twitter account. It’s doubtful he ever sees or has a true handle on what the mood across social media is, although I’m sure he’s aware now.
Superb. All these people that thought they were talking to TS in their DMs got catfished 😂
I think TS absence on social media is a massive indicator that something is going on,.
I wouldn’t read too much into it. He had no history of using social media before launching his Charlton interest, it’s only ever been used for that, and he stopped in May when things were getting more mixed. No guarantee it was even him tweeting (though I suspect it was).
Thomas has never used social media at all. Raelynn was behind his Twitter account. It’s doubtful he ever sees or has a true handle on what the mood across social media is, although I’m sure he’s aware now.
Awkward!!! I've sent him a tweet saying I fancy his wife
I think TS absence on social media is a massive indicator that something is going on,.
I wouldn’t read too much into it. He had no history of using social media before launching his Charlton interest, it’s only ever been used for that, and he stopped in May when things were getting more mixed. No guarantee it was even him tweeting (though I suspect it was).
Thomas has never used social media at all. Raelynn was behind his Twitter account. It’s doubtful he ever sees or has a true handle on what the mood across social media is, although I’m sure he’s aware now.
Superb. All these people that thought they were talking to TS in their DMs got catfished 😂
Oh no, that’s made my day that has. And it’s only just gone 8am 😂
Why sack a manager if you've just agreed to sell the club?
TS was pissed BG went public with his complaints and knowing the new owners will bring in the own man saw no reason not to be petty and exercise his displeasure?
Seems an expensive way to be petty.
Count me in "I don't believe it" camp. Been here too many times with these vague internet rumours.
Hasn’t there been a rumour of a break clause or one where Sandgaard could get rid of Garner cheap because he failed to meet a target? If that’s true it would make sense that Sandgaard sacked him and the buyers whacked on 50/100k than coming in and having to sack him themselves.
Another possibility is new owners didn’t want to come in and sack the manager as their first action. Sandgaard does it, new owners come in and get to hire their choice.
Maybe. All seems a bit wishful thinking to me though.
And a bit coincidental that just as the majority mood starts to turn towards protest and we see a Sandgaard out banner at a match there’s is a new “takeover imminent rumour”.
I have nothing to go on but my gut, and my gut tells me it’s bollocks. But my gut isn’t always right either.
I don’t believe for a minute that Varney would play a part in any shenanigans, which for me adds credence to these claims. My glass definitely half full.
Why sack a manager if you've just agreed to sell the club?
TS was pissed BG went public with his complaints and knowing the new owners will bring in the own man saw no reason not to be petty and exercise his displeasure?
Seems an expensive way to be petty.
Count me in "I don't believe it" camp. Been here too many times with these vague internet rumours.
Hasn’t there been a rumour of a break clause or one where Sandgaard could get rid of Garner cheap because he failed to meet a target? If that’s true it would make sense that Sandgaard sacked him and the buyers whacked on 50/100k than coming in and having to sack him themselves.
Another possibility is new owners didn’t want to come in and sack the manager as their first action. Sandgaard does it, new owners come in and get to hire their choice.
Maybe. All seems a bit wishful thinking to me though.
And a bit coincidental that just as the majority mood starts to turn towards protest and we see a Sandgaard out banner at a match there’s is a new “takeover imminent rumour”.
I have nothing to go on but my gut, and my gut tells me it’s bollocks. But my gut isn’t always right either.
Me too except Scoham's post pointing to DubaiCAFC's post of 1st Dec, pre Stockport, is encouraging, plus separate origins of similar rumours, i.e from others.
I think TS absence on social media is a massive indicator that something is going on,.
I wouldn’t read too much into it. He had no history of using social media before launching his Charlton interest, it’s only ever been used for that, and he stopped in May when things were getting more mixed. No guarantee it was even him tweeting (though I suspect it was).
Thomas has never used social media at all. Raelynn was behind his Twitter account. It’s doubtful he ever sees or has a true handle on what the mood across social media is, although I’m sure he’s aware now.
Well there you go. I could tell it wasn’t being done by a professional, but doubted he’d be interested. So that makes perfect sense. Cheers Olly
I think TS absence on social media is a massive indicator that something is going on,.
I wouldn’t read too much into it. He had no history of using social media before launching his Charlton interest, it’s only ever been used for that, and he stopped in May when things were getting more mixed. No guarantee it was even him tweeting (though I suspect it was).
Thomas has never used social media at all. Raelynn was behind his Twitter account. It’s doubtful he ever sees or has a true handle on what the mood across social media is, although I’m sure he’s aware now.
Stopped after "understand that not to be correct" then. Perhaps not a surprise!
Any chance of getting Rui Pinto transferred to the EFL?
Comments
Well......the EFL said "ok then, we sanction the takeover" but forgot to tell the fans that ESI had not passed all of the "fit & proper" test as the source of the money could not be evidenced......and therefore we would be under a transfer embargo !!!!
We've been down this road more than once. I wont believe ANYTHING until actual signings are revealed.
Count me in "I don't believe it" camp. Been here too many times with these vague internet rumours.
I have nothing to go on but my gut, and my gut tells me it’s bollocks. But my gut isn’t always right either.
It’s doubtful he ever sees or has a true handle on what the mood across social media is, although I’m sure he’s aware now.
My glass definitely half full.
https://forum.charltonlife.com/discussion/comment/4841012#Comment_4841012
Any chance of getting Rui Pinto transferred to the EFL?
She tried to deflect the majority of the abuse and only feed back the positives. Presumably she has run out of things to tell him