Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

January Transfer Window - Jan 2023 (Deadline Day starts page 112)

1100101103105106173

Comments

  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    chev said:
    Plotting?  Are they going to kidnap him under the cover of darkness? 
  • sam3110
    sam3110 Posts: 21,265
    Kirk and Stockley off the books will help a lot. Especially if we can get them done today and get in a replacement or two by tomorrow night
  • Would rather Kilkenny over Morgan every day of the week in midfield 
    Morgan's performance on Saturday was baffling. 50% brilliant. 50% terrible
    Change Saturday for his entire Charlton career and you have summed him up perfectly
  • thenewbie
    thenewbie Posts: 11,001
    Dazzler21 said:
    mendonca said:
    Payne, Morgan, Kilkenny, Henry....all quite similar in physical stature.
     Are they?

    Payne 5ft 5" - Short & Stocky
    Kilkenny 5ft 7" Short and Slim
    Henry 5ft 9" Average and Average
    Morgan 5ft 11" Average and Slim

    You've got half a foot's difference between the lot and when it comes to their footballing style they're all different too. 

    All very different players.
    (I can't speak for Kilkenny's play style yet).

    And height doesn't ALWAYS equate to physical style anyway - Dobson is tall but not particularly "big" (by football standards) and still mixes it up effectively. Andy Hughes was not a monster physically but loved a scrap.

    A lack of height could potentially be a hindrance at set pieces but that's where our own defence and forwards need to step up anyway.
  • shirty5
    shirty5 Posts: 19,223
    sam3110 said:
    Kirk and Stockley off the books will help a lot. Especially if we can get them done today and get in a replacement or two by tomorrow night
    Only if they are permanent deals. Stockley has another 18 months left and Kirk 2 and half years to go.

    These long contracts given out are coming back to hit Sandgaard in the pocket 
  • J BLOCK
    J BLOCK Posts: 8,310
    Don't think i've ever been less interested in a transfer thread. We're not going up, not going down and only have money for loan players that we will not keep beyond the season. 
  • eastterrace6168
    eastterrace6168 Posts: 22,518
    edited January 2023
    Great Stockley to Fleetwood, now watch him score a hat trick on the 11th Feb!! 🤷‍♂️
  • shirty5
    shirty5 Posts: 19,223
    shirty5 said:
    sam3110 said:
    Kirk and Stockley off the books will help a lot. Especially if we can get them done today and get in a replacement or two by tomorrow night
    Only if they are permanent deals. Stockley has another 18 months left and Kirk 2 and half years to go.

    These long contracts given out are coming back to hit Sandgaard in the pocket 
    And Kirk is a loan to Burton

    https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/charlton-winger-charlie-kirk-expected-to-make-loan-move-away-before-deadline/
  • Expect DJ to follow Kirk and Stockley out the door today as well then .... sounds like a good clear out by Holden and not carrying any passengers. 
  • Sponsored links:



  • Expect DJ to follow Kirk and Stockley out the door today as well then .... sounds like a good clear out by Holden and not carrying any passengers. 
    Great if they all went none good enough for what hopefully will be a better season and promotion push next year
    hopefully the loans with view to perms
  • Gribbo
    Gribbo Posts: 8,484
    Assuming that link on players salaries, shared the other day, was correct, off loading Kirk with save £5k a week, not sure where Stockley was on it, but woulda thought he'd be on around the same
  • MarcusH26
    MarcusH26 Posts: 8,035
    All well and good getting Kirk off the books but there has to be a replacement for him lined up otherwise we're very light wide for a side that wants to play 433. 
  • shirty5
    shirty5 Posts: 19,223
    Gribbo said:
    Assuming that link on players salaries, shared the other day, was correct, off loading Kirk with save £5k a week, not sure where Stockley was on it, but woulda thought he'd be on around the same
    Very doubtful that a club would pay 100% wages on a loan player. 
  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    Gribbo said:
    Assuming that link on players salaries, shared the other day, was correct, off loading Kirk with save £5k a week, not sure where Stockley was on it, but woulda thought he'd be on around the same
    It only saves 5k a week if Burton pay all of it...
  • Chunes
    Chunes Posts: 17,349
    It's mad that we've got so many players in some positions that we're having to trim the squad and yet we only had one senior left-back at the start of the season. 
  • CAFCBourne
    CAFCBourne Posts: 3,790
    Hopefully Kilkeeny can put his foot in unliked skippy Fraser and Morgan
  • Scoham
    Scoham Posts: 37,376
    MarcusH26 said:
    All well and good getting Kirk off the books but there has to be a replacement for him lined up otherwise we're very light wide for a side that wants to play 433. 
    Not convinced we’ll get a winger in, Campbell is Kirk’s replacement.

    That’s not a bad thing, he clearly has potential to do well at this level and looks a better fit for a Holden side. We need pace and energy on the wings, Kirk’s a low tempo player suited to a possession side.
  • Scoham said:
    MarcusH26 said:
    All well and good getting Kirk off the books but there has to be a replacement for him lined up otherwise we're very light wide for a side that wants to play 433. 
    Not convinced we’ll get a winger in, Campbell is Kirk’s replacement.

    That’s not a bad thing, he clearly has potential to do well at this level and looks a better fit for a Holden side. We need pace and energy on the wings, Kirk’s a low tempo player suited to a possession side.
    He's a 19 year old kid. I wouldn't want to play him every week if JRS or CBT got injured. We NEED more cover than that.
  • Scoham said:
    MarcusH26 said:
    All well and good getting Kirk off the books but there has to be a replacement for him lined up otherwise we're very light wide for a side that wants to play 433. 
    Not convinced we’ll get a winger in, Campbell is Kirk’s replacement.

    That’s not a bad thing, he clearly has potential to do well at this level and looks a better fit for a Holden side. We need pace and energy on the wings, Kirk’s a low tempo player suited to a possession side.
    He's a 19 year old kid. I wouldn't want to play him every week if JRS or CBT got injured. We NEED more cover than that.
    I'd agree with you if we weren't a league one club losing £8 million per year.

    We're really not going to sign another winger in those circumstances, particularly when you see Campbell looks promising. 
  • Sponsored links:



  • esseffect
    esseffect Posts: 493
    Bit alarming with our injury record
  • SantaClaus
    SantaClaus Posts: 7,652
    With a name like his and an injury record like ours you just know how this is going to play out.


  • ross1
    ross1 Posts: 50,974
    If Stockley goes, on loan or permanent, we will need another striker, we only have two plus Aneke. I am not counting Kanu, as I do not think he is ready. If Kirk and/or DJ goes, we should be OK with Campbell. Payne could always play wide if need be or Clare

  • Bailey
    Bailey Posts: 3,265
    Chunes said:
    It's mad that we've got so many players in some positions that we're having to trim the squad and yet we only had one senior left-back at the start of the season. 
    It's a madness that if, all rumours are true, we are having a complete overall in the January window, Chunes. Look at our wide players, apart from Campbell, losing anyone of them is a bonus, Blackett Taylor, DJ and Kirk would not get in a top six side. 
  • KingKinsella
    KingKinsella Posts: 1,312
    Just seen an Inside Football article saying that there is interest in Lyle Taylor from un- named clubs. His contract is up in June. Looks like a bit of a desperation in the piece- either the Nott. F. placed it to create interest because they want to move him on(which there was a piece in Dec that suggested that), or his agent because he wants to go and nobody is enquiring.
  • mendonca
    mendonca Posts: 9,405
    Dazzler21 said:
    mendonca said:
    Payne, Morgan, Kilkenny, Henry....all quite similar in physical stature.
     Are they?

    Payne 5ft 5" - Short & Stocky
    Kilkenny 5ft 7" Short and Slim
    Henry 5ft 9" Average and Average
    Morgan 5ft 11" Average and Slim

    You've got half a foot's difference between the lot and when it comes to their footballing style they're all different too. 

    All very different players.
    (I can't speak for Kilkenny's play style yet).

    Crikes you must be bored searching each player's height :)My point was indeed related to how they each lack a physical presence in midfield. 
  • RonnieMoore
    RonnieMoore Posts: 4,496
    Great Stockley to Fleetwood, now watch him score a hat trick on the 11th Feb!! 🤷‍♂️
    Won’t be allowed to play against us 
  • Cafc43v3r
    Cafc43v3r Posts: 21,600
    Scoham said:
    MarcusH26 said:
    All well and good getting Kirk off the books but there has to be a replacement for him lined up otherwise we're very light wide for a side that wants to play 433. 
    Not convinced we’ll get a winger in, Campbell is Kirk’s replacement.

    That’s not a bad thing, he clearly has potential to do well at this level and looks a better fit for a Holden side. We need pace and energy on the wings, Kirk’s a low tempo player suited to a possession side.
    He's a 19 year old kid. I wouldn't want to play him every week if JRS or CBT got injured. We NEED more cover than that.
    Captain Clayden is still here.. 
  • shine166
    shine166 Posts: 13,918
    Great Stockley to Fleetwood, now watch him score a hat trick on the 11th Feb!! 🤷‍♂️
    Won’t be allowed to play against us 
    That's unfortunate 
  • Great Stockley to Fleetwood, now watch him score a hat trick on the 11th Feb!! 🤷‍♂️
    Won’t be allowed to play against us 
    Only if its a loan deal surely?