Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Sports personality of the year 2022

2

Comments

  • There should be a Sportswomen and Sportsman of year.
  • Would quite like to see Eve Muirhead winning it, after finally getting that Gold Medal.

    Can see it going to Beth Mead
    lol 1/33 on, definitely going to Beth Mead, personally a bit of bias how Ronnie hasn't won it to date and won the worlds this year , has done everything in the game, not sure what he can do to win it. 
    I tweeted this earlier I disagree with Ronnie winning it this year, the whole of snooker twittter is saying he should be why?

    He won his 7th world title fair enough however its sports personality of the YEAR

    Not sports personality of the career

    This year he has won A world Championship not 7 just the one.

    Give him the lifetime achievement award or something else but SPOTY for winning one title is a bit of a stretch

    If any snooker player should have won it recently I would say Trump had a chance in 2020 when he won 5 or 6 ranking titles.

    This is no Anti Ronnie bias btw I don't think Selby should get it for winning his 1st or his 4th or when he wins his 7th i don't think he should get it.

    1 tournament doesn't deserve SPOTY IMO
  • There should be a Sportswomen of year.
    There is
  • Jonniesta said:
    Not sure. Stokes' record with bat and ball isn't great this year, arguably Bairstow would have made more of an impact, Brook in the latest series. Stokes also won it in 2019 (quite rightly). Not sure you can win SPOTY for a well-timed declaration. Which individual has ever won to 'tick the boxes', certainly since the public vote? 
    I think that's undermining his influence. He and McCullum have created a whole new attitude to Test cricket but success on the field has only been achieved by bringing the players on board and without fear of retribution should it go wrong for them as individuals in doing so. One could argue that it is Stokes' personality that has made that possible which is ironic because the award, despite its title, is never awarded for having that. What personality do Nigel Mansell or even Michael Owen for that matter have?
    Can't argue with that on the personality front, he could win it every year on that. And he's certainly shown great attributes as skipper, but guessing he'll do that every year and probably needs an Ashes-winning knock to win it again. McCullum I agree with. 
  • redman said:
    Got to be Stokes hasn't it. Completely turned English cricket around almost single handedly. Including a 3-0 series win in Pakistan, our first series win ever. O a world cup win in T20 in which he played a major part. 
    Absolutely- Ben Stokes for sure!
  • Would quite like to see Eve Muirhead winning it, after finally getting that Gold Medal.

    Can see it going to Beth Mead
    lol 1/33 on, definitely going to Beth Mead, personally a bit of bias how Ronnie hasn't won it to date and won the worlds this year , has done everything in the game, not sure what he can do to win it. 
    I tweeted this earlier I disagree with Ronnie winning it this year, the whole of snooker twittter is saying he should be why?

    He won his 7th world title fair enough however its sports personality of the YEAR

    Not sports personality of the career

    This year he has won A world Championship not 7 just the one.

    Give him the lifetime achievement award or something else but SPOTY for winning one title is a bit of a stretch

    If any snooker player should have won it recently I would say Trump had a chance in 2020 when he won 5 or 6 ranking titles.

    This is no Anti Ronnie bias btw I don't think Selby should get it for winning his 1st or his 4th or when he wins his 7th i don't think he should get it.

    1 tournament doesn't deserve SPOTY IMO
    I am shocked/not shocked at your response Paulie :) I am sure if Selby won it you would change your views instantly. It's more the achievement at his age winning the world championship and went back to world no1. 

    I agree Stokes has an equally good case, i don't really want to dismiss Beth Mead as she will no doubt deserve it. However based on those bookies i am very surpirsed its so one sided and often feel like Ronnie has been dismissed when he has had several years where he should be in contention for the top spot, i would also argue Phil Taylor, clearly it isn't what they are looking for or maybe as all other sports have a wider/larger audience? 

    Going back to 1988 the last snooker person won it and that was Steve Davis, how Hendry or Ronnie haven't won it does surprise me, not just their stature within the game but also several years where they have won lots and the worlds and broke all sorts of records. 
  • Would quite like to see Eve Muirhead winning it, after finally getting that Gold Medal.

    Can see it going to Beth Mead
    lol 1/33 on, definitely going to Beth Mead, personally a bit of bias how Ronnie hasn't won it to date and won the worlds this year , has done everything in the game, not sure what he can do to win it. 
    I tweeted this earlier I disagree with Ronnie winning it this year, the whole of snooker twittter is saying he should be why?

    He won his 7th world title fair enough however its sports personality of the YEAR

    Not sports personality of the career

    This year he has won A world Championship not 7 just the one.

    Give him the lifetime achievement award or something else but SPOTY for winning one title is a bit of a stretch

    If any snooker player should have won it recently I would say Trump had a chance in 2020 when he won 5 or 6 ranking titles.

    This is no Anti Ronnie bias btw I don't think Selby should get it for winning his 1st or his 4th or when he wins his 7th i don't think he should get it.

    1 tournament doesn't deserve SPOTY IMO
    I am shocked/not shocked at your response Paulie :) I am sure if Selby won it you would change your views instantly. It's more the achievement at his age winning the world championship and went back to world no1. 

    I agree Stokes has an equally good case, i don't really want to dismiss Beth Mead as she will no doubt deserve it. However based on those bookies i am very surpirsed its so one sided and often feel like Ronnie has been dismissed when he has had several years where he should be in contention for the top spot, i would also argue Phil Taylor, clearly it isn't what they are looking for or maybe as all other sports have a wider/larger audience? 

    Going back to 1988 the last snooker person won it and that was Steve Davis, how Hendry or Ronnie haven't won it does surprise me, not just their stature within the game but also several years where they have won lots and the worlds and broke all sorts of records. 
    As I say come back to me when Selby win his 5th/6th/7th and record breaking 8th and i will say the exact same thing.

    Its nothing to do with who it is its about what he has won 1 ranking tournament in a year is not enough to win spoty with the amount of snooker tournaments we have

    As i said i think Judd had an opportunity in 2020 winning 5 ranking events but losing in the uk final and only making the world quarter didnt help if he won those 2 he would have had a great chance.

    The age isnt shouldn't even come into it.

    Ronnie was 46 when he won the worlds in football or tennis that might mean something but in snooker it means nothing Mark Williams just became the oldest player to make a 147 should he get spoty because of his age 🤣🤣

    If you have natural talent like Ronnie and have no issues with eyesight then age isnt a factor as there is no issues until he has eyesight problems age wont matter
  • Pissed off that it's on Wednesday. 
  • Pissed off that it's on Wednesday. 
    Have to ask why? I like Wednesdays generally…..
  • Sponsored links:


  • just looking at the odds again:
    Beth Mead 1/10 
    Stokes 11/2
    Ronnie 40/1
    Muirhead 100/1

    Based on this Mead is nailed on, however if its a public vote and voting is only open during the actual awards/event, it feels a bit too short? no? 

    I just looked at the twitter followings:
    Stokes 1.1million
    Ronnie 550k
    Mead 115k 

    would it not make sense to actually back Stokes and go against the bookie? the other thing i noted, the first market was actually win without Beth Mead and Stokes is 2/7 for that.

    Interesting, not sure if its worth a dabble or not. is it going to be fixed? as its a public vote anything can happen in theory. 
  • Stokes for me 
  • just looking at the odds again:
    Beth Mead 1/10 
    Stokes 11/2
    Ronnie 40/1
    Muirhead 100/1

    Based on this Mead is nailed on, however if its a public vote and voting is only open during the actual awards/event, it feels a bit too short? no? 

    I just looked at the twitter followings:
    Stokes 1.1million
    Ronnie 550k
    Mead 115k 

    would it not make sense to actually back Stokes and go against the bookie? the other thing i noted, the first market was actually win without Beth Mead and Stokes is 2/7 for that.

    Interesting, not sure if its worth a dabble or not. is it going to be fixed? as its a public vote anything can happen in theory. 
    You can still get 7.8 on the Betfair Exchange on Stokes. I wouldn't put anyone off backing him but there are two things that bother me about doing so - the make up of those that actually can be bothered to vote / who they are likely to vote for and the split vote on the male options of Stokes and O'Sullivan  
  • IAgree said:
    Pissed off that it's on Wednesday. 
    Have to ask why? I like Wednesdays generally…..
    It belongs on Sunday. Imagine how ridiculous it would be if, for example, they held the World Cup in the middle of winter... 


    What?    
    Presumably the WC is why it's not on a Sunday. The WC could have drastically changed the voting.
  • IAgree said:
    Pissed off that it's on Wednesday. 
    Have to ask why? I like Wednesdays generally…..
    It belongs on Sunday. Imagine how ridiculous it would be if, for example, they held the World Cup in the middle of winter... 


    What?    
    Presumably the WC is why it's not on a Sunday. The WC could have drastically changed the voting.
    I assume that's why the shortlist wasn't issued until after the WC also
  • Matt Fitzpatrick. Wins the US Open. Oh but wait, BBC don’t do golf anymore and it was back in May. 
  • Matt Fitzpatrick. Wins the US Open. Oh but wait, BBC don’t do golf anymore and it was back in May. 
    It’s one tournament - would say McIlroy had a more impressive year. 
  • Ben Stokes
  • MrOneLung said:
    Matt Fitzpatrick. Wins the US Open. Oh but wait, BBC don’t do golf anymore and it was back in May. 
    It’s one tournament - would say McIlroy had a more impressive year. 
    I don’t disagree but it wasn’t the point I was making. 
  • Sponsored links:


  • MrOneLung said:
    Matt Fitzpatrick. Wins the US Open. Oh but wait, BBC don’t do golf anymore and it was back in May. 
    It’s one tournament - would say McIlroy had a more impressive year. 
    I don’t disagree but it wasn’t the point I was making. 
    They don’t do cricket but Stokes is there. 
  • Why has Kevin Sinfield not been nominated?
    That fella is a legend for how he has support his mate Rob Burrows.
  • JohnBoyUK said:
    Why has Kevin Sinfield not been nominated?
    That fella is a legend for how he has support his mate Rob Burrows.
    He should get a knighthood, a place in the Lords, made King and anything else they can give him.
  • Oh, ok.  Beep beep beep reversing.
  • He didn't know he was getting that, did he.
  • Has anyone ever given less of a fuck than Ben Stokes just did? 
  • George Dobson was farking robbed
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!