Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Lineker and Attenborough

1151618202126

Comments

  • vff said:

    Seriously, you think it is about a tax bill ?
    Gary Linekar is expressing an opinion about an illegal, unworkable, inhuman that will break human rights conventions and brands refugees as guilty economic migrants before assessment. The Conservatives who allowed the waiting list for asylum decisions to rocket to over 160,000 in 13 years.  The Conservatives, who have closed off legal routes and know full well that this policy will fail. It’s all to deflect accountability and distract from the terrible state of the country on just about everything on their watch. All for a cynical ploy to save their policital skins from a deserved electoral hiding.
    Sorry but what’s illegal here that he’s expressing an opinion on? I’m sure the Home Secretary is more likely to be on the right side of the law than the lefty parasite. I wonder what his “opinion” is on the allegations that his brother has date raped young girls and embezzled numerous people. I’d be interested to hear that.
    KC Chris Daw doesn’t agree with you, he said this:
    Braverman’s blatant lies about the legal position on the asylum bill, including that her “army of lawyers” say it “might be legal”, are so serious and so extreme that she should be disbarred. She is welcome to sue me for libel and I will happily see her in court.
    I don’t agree with well known lefty KC Daw either. Any KC that goes public with comments like that is an embarrassment
    That doesn’t surprise me, but it also doesn’t make either you or Bravrerman correct. I suspect she won’t sue KC Daw for libel and I also suspect the asylum bill as it stands will be proved to be illegal. Perhaps the government will change the law to accommodate it.
    Anything to try and stop the boats and undocumented young blokes roaming around the country is deemed rascist. It’s ridiculous. Surely something needs to change. Anyway, this is about Lineker breaking impartiality rules which I’m pretty sure he’s done.
    This won't stop the boats. We all want to stop people being trafficked in small boats, so opening up safe legal routes is the best way. We have an obligation to take our fair share of refugees. 
    That’s not the point though. Making the problem solvable by having safe routes and good due process wouldn’t serve the governments agenda to create someone for the rightys to hate.



    No of course not, but there are people who can't see that. 
  • thread closed in 3...2...1......
    Congratulations on your promotion 
  • Very strange watching brief highlights without commentary. Like watching YouTube clips 
  • Agreed. A bit of commentary with no punditry and it’s a worth watching.
  • That was the best Match of the Day since the start of the premier league.
  • Sponsored links:


  • vff said:
    vff said:

    Seriously, you think it is about a tax bill ?
    Gary Linekar is expressing an opinion about an illegal, unworkable, inhuman that will break human rights conventions and brands refugees as guilty economic migrants before assessment. The Conservatives who allowed the waiting list for asylum decisions to rocket to over 160,000 in 13 years.  The Conservatives, who have closed off legal routes and know full well that this policy will fail. It’s all to deflect accountability and distract from the terrible state of the country on just about everything on their watch. All for a cynical ploy to save their policital skins from a deserved electoral hiding.
    Sorry but what’s illegal here that he’s expressing an opinion on? I’m sure the Home Secretary is more likely to be on the right side of the law than the lefty parasite. I wonder what his “opinion” is on the allegations that his brother has date raped young girls and embezzled numerous people. I’d be interested to hear that.
    KC Chris Daw doesn’t agree with you, he said this:
    Braverman’s blatant lies about the legal position on the asylum bill, including that her “army of lawyers” say it “might be legal”, are so serious and so extreme that she should be disbarred. She is welcome to sue me for libel and I will happily see her in court.
    I don’t agree with well known lefty KC Daw either. Any KC that goes public with comments like that is an embarrassment
    That doesn’t surprise me, but it also doesn’t make either you or Bravrerman correct. I suspect she won’t sue KC Daw for libel and I also suspect the asylum bill as it stands will be proved to be illegal. Perhaps the government will change the law to accommodate it.
    Anything to try and stop the boats and undocumented young blokes roaming around the country is deemed rascist. It’s ridiculous. Surely something needs to change. Anyway, this is about Lineker breaking impartiality rules which I’m pretty sure he’s done.

    You are not really paying attention to the illegal migrant policy only to the headline. That's what the government want you to focus on. There are only a few places in Rwanda and it is a hugely expensive and impractical solution. There are insufficient and no suitable accommodation for refugees that would be locked up. The government are not working through the 160,000 backlog of applications that would ensure those that can contribute can work and those that don't meet the criteria are returned.

    There is no right to return to the country that the refugees arrived from. There is no joined up co operation with the French to tackle criminal gangs. The policy will not work. Its just a dog whistle headline to make it look like the government is doing something.

    The refugees are being misrepresened as illegal when 70% would be accepted as refugees if assessed. UK takes far lower amounts of refugees than majority of other European countries. The reason why the country is in such a state, your bills are so high, the economy is in such a state, there are insufficient houses being built, lack of affordable housing, extorniate rents with no check on the condition of those properties is largely down to this Conservative government. The sewage in the sea and rivers. It is not due to the refugees coming in on boats. The hard right conservatives are trying to fool people, misdirect and distract from their complete ineptness, denseness and lack of any sense in their policies.  This disgrace of a government deserve the electoral wipe out that's coming their way. 

    Mic drop. 👏👏👏
  • That was the best Match of the Day since the start of the premier league.
    Í’m sorry. Ahead of a long list of candidates this is the most unacceptable post in the entire thread. 

    Any proper Charlton knows that the best MOTD ever was the season opener in August 2000 with Motty commenting as newly promoted Charlton thrashed Citeh - George Weah allegedly playing and Noel Gallagher definitely in the Jimmy seed - 4-0 with debutant Kevin Lisbie also twice hitting the woodwork. In Motty’s immortal words “this is turning into something of a rout”. They showed the table with Charlton on top of the Premier League, and Citeh bottom. 

    Shocking loss of perspective😉
    Should have added 'that I have seen'. Was on holiday in Ibiza so missed that one.
  • edited March 2023
    RedPanda said:

    [tweet deleted]

    Attenborough has left the conversations. The BBC said that episode was never going to air anyway. Is that us being gas lit? I struggle to understand that term. 
    That's a video from Twitter, it's not from the BBC. Probably not best to stick tweets from randoms making grand claims in this discussion, on either side.
  • When did it come a thing that you have to hate those with differing views to you?
    Round about the time you set up the HOC thread.
  • edited March 2023
    cfgs said:
    Not getting in to the whole debate about the BBC, etc but MOTD without the punditry means more football, which is good.


    I will however say that if Mr Lineker knew anything about the rise of Hitler and his mob he wouldn't make the comparison. He owes an apology not to the government but to the memory of all those who suffered at the hands of the Third Reich.
    He didn’t make that comparison. He said some of the language used is not dissimilar. 
    Personally I think GL knew exactly what that implied. As we all know what followed the language in Germany.
    How do you think Hitler persuaded the Germans to put him into power. He employed hate speech and the demonising of a minority. If you cannot see any similarities between the language Hitler employed and what people like our Home Secretary are using then you need to look a little closer. Language is how it started, followed by removal of human rights. Ring any bells ? Resettlement to the east ! What direction is Rwanda ? 
    There's only so far you can stretch historical analogies, and I fear this is a step too far. 
    Which analogy is wrong ? 
    The Germans didn't put Hitler into power though democratic means. .
    If you think the language of our Government resembles Mein Kampf well....I cant really explain that to you.
    Your analogy is as much nonsense as suggesting a Corbyn vctory in the 2019 election would have resulted in Gulags up north and the purging of the Milliband brothers..

     

    By November 1932 the Nazi’s held the most seats in the Reichstag. In January 1933 Hitler was made Chancellor in a coalition, in much the same way that David Cameron first became  Prime Minister here.
    So you agree the Germans didn’t put Hitler into power by democratic means?
    So who should have been Chancellor when the Nazi’s held the most seats won democratically?
    Whoever the President appointed.  
  • Chizz said:
    And I didn't watch it.  Solidarity.

    Admittedly, I very rarely watch it, but this time I made the conscious decision to actively not watch it.
  • Sponsored links:


  • I was curious to see what they would do but resisted that and didn't watch it.
  • Foxycafc said:
    I am absolutely furious. Proof the BBC are completely under the Tories' thumb. 


    Strange as on 'Have I got news for you' and when ever Frankie Boyle opens his mouth they seem to bash the Tories; easy target as the cabinet are so right wing and they have a "let them eat cake" mentality.

    I think Gary lineker was looking to leave as so many of his colleagues at the BBC have done in recent years: Andrew Marr, Emily Maitlis, Dan Walker etc.

    Gary is trying to force a transfer despite the fact his legs have gone.

    Does Aunty have balls or have they scored an own goal ?
    I think they shot themselves in the foot at such an angle the bullet took their balls off on the way.  They have totalled caved to Tory pressure.
  • edited March 2023
    Well I quite enjoyed MOTD last night.

    It's a bit like when Border Force officers went on strike recently and the army stepped in and did a better job. 

    Extend it to 30 minutes, put a clock in the corner so we know what stage of the game it is, and have the occasional statistic pop up in a box and you have a winning formula.

    Public service broadcasting at its best.
  • edited March 2023
    Bailey said:
    Britain became divided after Brexit AFKA. In 2016 Labour MP Jo Cox was murdered by Thomas Mair, those two acts have left our society in a very bad place. My own view is that the wounds need to be healed and in any sane society that would be the case but due to their disastrous tenancy since 2019, the Conservative government need a bogey man to blame and the asylum seekers are the bogeyman.  
    Absolute bollocks.  This country has been divided since it was a country and just like any other country.

    The fact that a fair proportion of people either don't give a flying fuck what a self appointed mouthpiece like Lineker has to say, or disagree or agree with him is just normal human behaviour.  It is all just oxygen for those who earn a living stirring the pot, generating febrile news mulch and serving their own political agender on both sides.

    It's all fucking nonsense.
    The divide already existed and the Brexit vote exposed it, as asking any  'are you for or against?' question would. Similarly the people of Scotland exposed their division of opinion on independence in their 2014 referendum. If opinion hadn't already been divided on those issues, there would have been no need to hold votes on them.

    I did watch MOTD and didn't miss the post match prattle, not one little bit. It was odd without the commentary and the chanting could have been amplified, but the biggest miss for me was the theme tune.
  • If only there was a way to skip the punditry segments of match of the day. 
  • edited March 2023
    MOTD reminded me of the game being played on Championship Manager.
  • 1StevieG said:
    Makes you wonder why people bother watching it if they are that bothered with punditry etc., 

    I also find it weird people say they hate Gary Lineker???? Really? Why does he wind people up so much? Don’t watch him if you don’t like him ffs.

    I don’t like Piers Morgan but I’m not watching TalkTV so he can wind me up some more. People are so precious these days.
    In fairness, many people I know haven't watched the punditry for years - sky+ (other systems are available) has been a godsend.

    It's not just MOTD (and Football League highlights) that has benefitted from this, but virtually every other programme as well.

    If anyone watches The Chase, winding through the bit where the contestants are asked their opinion is a lifesaver. "I think you could get the 25 thousand, but we'd really want you back here, so I'd stick with the 6" ad nauseam. 
This discussion has been closed.

Roland Out Forever!