Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Match Officials adopt new approach for 2023/24 season

Match Officials in the EFL will adopt a new approach to time keeping in the 2023/24 campaign.

In line with the most recent IFAB guidance, the EFL and PGMOL are committed to ensure a more accurate calculation of additional time alongside an improvement in the amount of time the ball is in-play from the start of the new season.

Below is a summary of the key changes relating to additional time, treatment of players, law changes and participant behaviour, that will take effect from the first game of the EFL season on Friday 4 August.

Enhancing ball in-play times

As the game collectively looks to enhance the amount of time the ball is in play in the forthcoming campaign, the exact time lost when certain game events occur will now be added. In previous seasons the policy was to add on a nominal period of time for certain game events. The events include:

  • Goals and subsequent celebrations
  • Substitutions
  • Injuries and treatment time (if required)
  • Penalties (from moment of offence to the whistle for the penalty kick)
  • Red cards (from moment of offence to when the player leaves the field)

Alongside a more accurate allowance for time lost during the game, the EFL will also adopt the multi-ball system, which has been proven to increase ball in-play time.

Match officials will also be taking a more robust approach to dealing with clear/deliberate actions that are impactful in delaying the restart of play, with players cautioned if they are guilty of:

  • Delaying the restart of play
  • Failing to respect the required distance at free-kicks.

Supporters across the game will be familiar with the changes in relation to the calculation of additional time, with both the Men’s World Cup in 2022 and Women’s World Cup this summer adopting a variation of this approach.

Treatment of players

Players who require assessment on the pitch for a potential injury will now receive treatment off the field of play​, apart from certain circumstances as laid out in Law 5 of the Laws of the Game:

  • A goalkeeper is injured.
  • A goalkeeper and an outfield player have collided and need attention.
  • Players from the same team have collided and need attention.
  • A severe injury has occurred.
  • A player is injured as the result of a physical offence for which the opponent is cautioned or sent off (e.g., reckless or serious foul challenge), if the assessment/treatment is completed quickly.
  • A penalty has been awarded and the injured player will be the taker.


After the restart of play, a period of time - not less than 30 seconds - will be afforded for the player to be treated and they will not return to the pitch before this period has elapsed​. As always, the player’s return to the pitch requires the referee's permission​ and may be delayed beyond 30 seconds if the phase of play is in the vicinity of the player looking to re-enter the pitch.​

In circumstances where a player declines the physio, if a team-mate clearly delays or refuses to re-start the game that team-mate will be issued a yellow card​. This will promote player safety, which is of paramount importance to the match officials, and act as a deterrent to players who request attention as a tactic to waste time or break the momentum of the game.

Key Law changes

Amongst the Law changes for 2023/24, as outlined by The IFAB, is an update on the wording of a denial of an obvious goal-scoring opportunity and a change of an element of previous guidance to offside law (Law 11).

Denial of an obvious goal-scoring opportunity
Where a player commits an offence against an opponent within their own penalty area which denies an opponent an obvious goal-scoring opportunity and the referee awards a penalty kick:

  • A yellow card will be issued if the offence was an attempt to play the ball or a challenge for the ball.
  • A red card will be shown in all other circumstances (e.g., holding, pulling, pushing, no possibility to play the ball)

The additional wording means that whilst cynical non-footballing actions such as clear holding, pushing and handball offences will continue to be sanctioned with a penalty and red card, where there is an attempt to play the ball or challenge for the ball a penalty and yellow card is the expected outcome.

Offside
Regarding offside, The IFAB and FIFA have also clarified the guidelines for determining a ‘deliberate play’ by a defender.

A ‘deliberate play’ is when a player has control of the ball and with the possibility of:

  • Passing the ball to a team-mate; or
  • Gaining possession of the ball; or
  • Clearing the ball (e.g., by kicking or heading it)

If a player is considered to be in control of the pass, attempt to gain possession or clearance, this would be a ‘deliberate play’ and the attacker in an offside position should not be penalised for offside. An inaccurate or unsuccessful action does not change the fact that the defender ‘deliberately played’ the ball.

High threshold

As attempts continue to be made to keep the game flowing, a high threshold for penalising contact will remain, with officials not awarding a foul for all contact yet penalising when contact has a detrimental impact on an opponent.

Participant behaviour 

Similarly to delaying the restart, match officials will be empowered by the game to take a more robust approach to dealing with participant behaviour when it falls below expected standards on-field and in the technical area.

Full details will be announced ahead of the new season as part of the Love Football, Protect the Game campaign.

https://www.efl.com/news/2023/july/match-officials-adopt-new-approach-for-202324-season/

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/66335147

«13

Comments

  • For such a simple game, the guidelines are still so open to interpretation.
    Does this update to the offside law mean, for example, that goal Man U scored against Man City (when rashford was ‘offside’ but deemed not to be interfering) would now be allowed or not?
    They've used a thousand words instead of ten, so it’ll be down to interpretation. Again.
  • Can they just not be useless cnuts?
  • some games on Saturday could go on until 17.15, Tuesdays 'til 22.15
  • I'm all up for cracking down on time wasting, but this will lead to some silly amount of injury time added on 
  • I'm all up for cracking down on time wasting, but this will lead to some silly amount of injury time added on 
    What is silly about adding 30 minutes for a stoppage which lasts 30 minutes? 
  • sam3110 said:
    Games are going to finish at 5.30 from a 3pm kickoff at this rate
    with double figures for yellow cards 
  • Sponsored links:


  • One of the new time wasting ploys, is at goalkicks the full backs line up in the penalty area to recieve the ball from the goalkeeper, the goalkeeper then places the ball and send the full backs up field for a long goal kick.
  • Eventually we'll end up with 60-70 minute games but with a stopped clock on the sidelines. 

    A full 90 minute game is too long with all the stoppages actually being accounted for. 
  • It feels like there is already too much extra time, it's just going to drag the game out unnecessarily. 
  • Also, the EFL will be issuing referee's with "competence" on a trial basis.
  • I'd like to see the match sponsors come on earlier before the match starts so that they can get off the pitch so we can actually KO at 3pm instead of about 3.04 pm every home game 
    And everyone in the tunnel ready to come out the moment the "This Is The Valley" video has finished.

    I've always felt the gap between the video ending and players emerging is too long.
  • Also, the EFL will be issuing referee's with "competence" on a trial basis.
    That will never catch on.
  • I'd like to see the match sponsors come on earlier before the match starts so that they can get off the pitch so we can actually KO at 3pm instead of about 3.04 pm every home game 
    I never understand how we can never KO at 3pm.
    I’m sure the clocks in the changing rooms are slow.
  • Addendum 1 states ...
    As a mark of continued disrespect to supporters referees will continue to think of a number for time added on, albeit a bigger number.  Supporters will not be allowed to know when the clock is stopped/not stopped incorrectly nor know the progress of time added on the stadium screen.  Referees are sensitive people and the resulting calling of names may make them cry.
  • Any attempt to cut out time wasting gets my vote. It`s dishonest and is abused to achieve an unfair advantage. Maintain the standards we all want to see.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Off_it said:
    Any attempt to cut out time wasting gets my vote. It`s dishonest and is abused to achieve an unfair advantage. Maintain the standards we all want to see.
    I admire the sentiment.

    But when we're 1-0 up and under the cosh in the last minute of normal time and the board goes up with "24" on it, let's see how we all feel about it then!
    What if we are 1-0 down? Would you be happy to lose 24 minutes? 
  • Off_it said:
    Any attempt to cut out time wasting gets my vote. It`s dishonest and is abused to achieve an unfair advantage. Maintain the standards we all want to see.
    I admire the sentiment.

    But when we're 1-0 up and under the cosh in the last minute of normal time and the board goes up with "24" on it, let's see how we all feel about it then!
    What if we are 1-0 down? Would you be happy to lose 24 minutes? 
    Eh?

    All I'm saying is that if a board goes up with 24 minutes on it when we're hanging on then it will be interesting to see how we feel about it then.
  • Bilko said:
    I'd like to see the match sponsors come on earlier before the match starts so that they can get off the pitch so we can actually KO at 3pm instead of about 3.04 pm every home game 
    I never understand how we can never KO at 3pm.
    I’m sure the clocks in the changing rooms are slow.
    I think Bob Bolder brings the sponsors out a couple of minutes later than he should. 
  • edited July 2023
    .
  • edited July 2023
     
    Off_it said:
    Off_it said:
    Any attempt to cut out time wasting gets my vote. It`s dishonest and is abused to achieve an unfair advantage. Maintain the standards we all want to see.
    I admire the sentiment.

    But when we're 1-0 up and under the cosh in the last minute of normal time and the board goes up with "24" on it, let's see how we all feel about it then!
    What if we are 1-0 down? Would you be happy to lose 24 minutes? 
    Eh?

    All I'm saying is that if a board goes up with 24 minutes on it when we're hanging on then it will be interesting to see how we feel about it then.
    Oh, sorry, just giving the opposite view. I would feel the same as you and it would not be pleasant. In fact quite a familiar feeling for a Charlton fan over the years. 
  • I agree with the clarification of the penalty red card rule, genuine attempts to tackle the attacker should never be a red card, as well as a penalty.

    What are the chances of players and pundits understanding the changes? 
  • I agree with the clarification of the penalty red card rule, genuine attempts to tackle the attacker should never be a red card, as well as a penalty.

    What are the chances of players and pundits understanding the changes? 
    and more importantly the officials ?

  • Good

    One of my biggest pet peeves in football is time keeping, think the world cup was done well.

    Think Rugby do it best and don't see why we can't adopt that approach, everytime the ball isn't in play stop clock, then no need for injury time blow up at 90

    Just need someone to make sure the clock is being stopped everytime to ball is not in play 
    not quite right in R U the clock is only stopped by order of the referee, usually for injuries, TV checks, often to speak to a player or a team captain .. when the ball goes out of play for a line out restart the clock is not stopped, likewise when a scrum is forming, but then again, if the scrum (e.g.) continually collapses the referee can order the clock stopped in order to read the riot act to the forwards .. so the time is kept by an off field official but the referee is still in control  of stoppage time

    also, even when the time is up in R U, the game continues until the ball goes out of play and can continue if (e.g.) a penalty is awarded, the ball is kicked out of play, BUT the game then goes after a line out when the ball is returned in play until it  'legitimately' goes out of play .. some 80 minute games have gone on for well over 100 minutes
  • What about in Sunday League football when the ball ends up in a bush and covered in dogshit?

    Should the time be stopped for; 

    a) the retrieval of the ball from the bush,
    b) the additional time taken to wipe off the dog shit with your sleeve, or
    c) both - stop the clock as soon as the ball goes over the line.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!