Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Chuks (p.61 - Released)

1394042444565

Comments

  • Croydon
    Croydon Posts: 12,735
    Funny how we see the game differently. I thought he was awful. Our corner of the away end was all in agreement
  • Hal1x
    Hal1x Posts: 4,265
    edited March 8
    fenaddick said:
    Thought he was good today. Won a lot of battles and good close control. Certainly made it easier to relieve pressure. Also played 40ish mins with no hint of (muscular) injury
    Funny how we see things differently. 
    I thought he was poor and offered hardly anything. 
    He offered a lot more than leaburn 
    Leaburn offered very little I agree. 
    Godden should have come on.
    Godden would have been even more manhandled and dominated by their defence, the ref gave us nothing.
  • NabySarr
    NabySarr Posts: 4,292
    I think you can’t compare him to the Chuks of old. He’s a different player now. He can hold the ball up and win headers, he did that today, he can’t do what he used to be able to do outside of that 
  • Dazzler21
    Dazzler21 Posts: 51,360
    Croydon said:
    Funny how we see the game differently. I thought he was awful. Our corner of the away end was all in agreement
    Big fan of Chuks over the years and I felt the same as you today. Headless chicken games going on. 
  • oohaahmortimer
    oohaahmortimer Posts: 34,164
    He was at it with their 33 after the head injury and both could have been sent off pushing shoving punching grappling , really filthy stuff going on ,  
    im a big fan of his but today im thinking we should give Ahadme a run  nah fuck that stick with Chuks , no matter how shit he is he’s better than that bluff
  • LargeAddick
    LargeAddick Posts: 32,593
    fenaddick said:
    Thought he was good today. Won a lot of battles and good close control. Certainly made it easier to relieve pressure. Also played 40ish mins with no hint of (muscular) injury
    Funny how we see things differently. 
    I thought he was poor and offered hardly anything. 
    Agree.

    fenaddick said:
    Thought he was good today. Won a lot of battles and good close control. Certainly made it easier to relieve pressure. Also played 40ish mins with no hint of (muscular) injury
    Funny how we see things differently. 
    I thought he was poor and offered hardly anything. 
    He offered a lot more than leaburn 
    Agree. For a tall guy he wins very little in the air. I hope Godden starts on Tuesday.
  • Hal1x
    Hal1x Posts: 4,265
    He may not be fast anymore, but his feet are pretty quick.
  • Steven81
    Steven81 Posts: 1,012
    Hal1x said:
    He may not be fast anymore, but his feet are pretty quick.
    Like the football version of Bruce forsyth.
  • guinnessaddick
    guinnessaddick Posts: 28,659
    Steven81 said:
    Hal1x said:
    He may not be fast anymore, but his feet are pretty quick.
    Like the football version of Bruce forsyth.
    Not sure if he had a good game, good game.

  • Sponsored links:



  • Hal1x
    Hal1x Posts: 4,265
    edited March 29
    Steven81 said:
    Hal1x said:
    He may not be fast anymore, but his feet are pretty quick.
    Like the football version of Bruce forsyth.
    Not sure if he had a good game, good game.
    certainly worth looking at the old Scoreboard!
  • Looked sharp today.
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,879
    NabySarr said:
    Looked sharp today, much better. Need him to step up if Leaburn is out 
    Agreed a much better cameo today, looked sharp and desperate for a goal!
  • SDAddick
    SDAddick Posts: 14,468
    NabySarr said:
    Looked sharp today, much better. Need him to step up if Leaburn is out 
    Lovely finish too. Inches offside and unlucky. He needs a goal, shame he couldn't get one today. 
  • Alwaysneil
    Alwaysneil Posts: 13,815
    Was he offside? Didnt look offside from where i was sitting. 
  • Mendonca In Asdas
    Mendonca In Asdas Posts: 22,653
    Looked sharp today, in his brief cameo, word up.
  • sam3110
    sam3110 Posts: 21,286
    Was he offside? Didnt look offside from where i was sitting. 
    He's lost a bit of overall pace but he's still really sharp reactions wise, wouldn't by surprised if he timed it well and was on, but ass referees see the size of him and the gap between him and defenders and give it against him
  • superclive98
    superclive98 Posts: 4,775
    Was he offside? Didnt look offside from where i was sitting. 
    Yes, he was offside.
  • superclive98
    superclive98 Posts: 4,775
    He looked far better today than he has in recent appearances. Perhaps there's still a bit of life in him.

  • Sponsored links:



  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,733
    Showed that he still has an important role to play.
  • Elthamaddick
    Elthamaddick Posts: 15,819
    Chuks could easily have shot when he squared the ball to Dixon. It's says a lot about the guy that he chose to try and tee up the kid rather than go for glory himself. Especially as goals haven't been easy to come by this season.
    Thought exactly that, should’ve shot himself and had it been 1-1 he probably would’ve 

    tried to tee up Dixon and was very unlucky 
  • Elthamaddick
    Elthamaddick Posts: 15,819
    Although had it been 1-1 neither wouldve been on I suspect 
  • olster
    olster Posts: 1,399
    Chuks could easily have shot when he squared the ball to Dixon. It's says a lot about the guy that he chose to try and tee up the kid rather than go for glory himself. Especially as goals haven't been easy to come by this season.

    was trying to win a pen that he would've taken
  • LargeAddick
    LargeAddick Posts: 32,593
    Was he offside? Didnt look offside from where i was sitting. 
    Was directly in front of me and I could see right across the line and I thought that yes he was offside.
  • Exiled_Addick
    Exiled_Addick Posts: 17,179
    Camera angle wasn’t great on the reply, but he looked probably offside. Not by much though. I wasn’t totally sure, at first, if Anderson actually touched the ball, if not Chuks would’ve been on.

    Showed today why he’s on the bench ahead of Ahadme. Hopefully the start of him getting a bit of mojo back. As others have said, we need Chuks to be 1) available and 2) close to his best for as long as Leaburn is out. Hopefully he gets that goal soon. I think that might loosen him up a bit. 
  • GreenWithEnvy
    GreenWithEnvy Posts: 1,844
    I have this dream that Chuks signs off his playing career with us with a super sub winning goal in the play-off final to seal his cult status for Charlton.
  • Alwaysneil
    Alwaysneil Posts: 13,815
    I worry that 3/4 of Chuks battles are with his internal self. Yesterday was a no pressure free hit, often he is introduced when we are behind and desperately need something. The pressure he seems to put on himself to deliver sometimes seems to prevent him from being the free flowing menace that he can be.

    i hope he finds himself and is able to shine his light for us a few more times. Always loved Chuks. 
  • Towards the end of the game when it was 4-0 and Charlton looked like they were going to do their part in replicating the 7-6 score line and Huddersfield weren’t the approach from the losing team seemed to take on a more physical aspect. Chuks was the perfect player to bring on to counter that and I thought he had a much better game as a result than he’s enjoyed recently. Very encouraging for the run in imo because we are probably going to need him, especially if we are going to give Dixon some more time on the pitch.