Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Who will be the new Charlton coach? - p103. Nathan Jones confirmed
Comments
-
You're making an assumption that his decisions on managerial appointments haven't always been with scrutiny.swordfish said:If Scott's decisions are no longer being sanctioned without scrutiny, he can't be surprised but must feel undermined
First team men's manager is a key role, possibly THE key role on the football side (Sorry Karen) so I would expect the rest of the UK directors to have an interest and sign off on who is chosen.
Whether that has changed or whether the US money men are now having an input we don't know.
After two failures Scott and the rest of the UK directors will most likely be under more scrutiny from the money men than before.
Or it could just be that Scott wants Jones and the others are saying "let's speak to Lee Johnson first and then we can decide".
Personally, I think in a well functioning leadership team it is should be good to discuss big decisions and get consensus.
Not that I'm sure we have a well functioning leadership team.
PS Putting Lee Johnson's name in the hat was just a joke....or was it?9 -
Scott’s choice.. but not all agree.. doesn’t mean it won’t happen.Callumcafc said:
Can you clarify this? You're saying you've heard Jones is Scott's choice? Or the opposite?DubaiCAFC said:
Interestingly it is Scott got Jones..000__Jaaaaay__000 said:
Not really a surprise when one would imagine jones would want control whereas Scott won’t allow that otherwise he’s out of a job so probably advising not to proceedDubaiCAFC said:The board don’t all agree on Jones, so maybe not as close as some think5 -
This whole process sounds like a load of spoilt kids arguing over who's gonna be leader of then gang, just get on with it ffs...4
-
Not a chance with Lee Johnson..Henry Irving said:
You're making an assumption that his decisions on managerial appointments haven't always been with scrutiny.swordfish said:If Scott's decisions are no longer being sanctioned without scrutiny, he can't be surprised but must feel undermined
First team men's manager is a key role, possibly THE key role on the football side (Sorry Karen) so I would expect the rest of the UK directors to have an interest and sign off on who is chosen.
Whether that has changed or whether the US money men are now having an input we don't know.
After two failures Scott and the rest of the UK directors will most likely be under more scrutiny from the money men than before.
Or it could just be that Scott wants Jones and the others are saying "let's speak to Lee Johnson first and then we can decide".
Personally, I think in a well functioning leadership team it is should be good to discuss big decisions and get consensus.
Not that I'm sure we have a well functioning leadership team.
PS Putting Lee Johnson's name in the hat was just a joke....or was it?1 -
Ok thank youDubaiCAFC said:
Scott’s choice.. but not all agree.. doesn’t mean it won’t happen.Callumcafc said:
Can you clarify this? You're saying you've heard Jones is Scott's choice? Or the opposite?DubaiCAFC said:
Interestingly it is Scott got Jones..000__Jaaaaay__000 said:
Not really a surprise when one would imagine jones would want control whereas Scott won’t allow that otherwise he’s out of a job so probably advising not to proceedDubaiCAFC said:The board don’t all agree on Jones, so maybe not as close as some think0 -
Would probably all thought the same with Appleton?DubaiCAFC said:
Not a chance with Lee Johnson..Henry Irving said:
You're making an assumption that his decisions on managerial appointments haven't always been with scrutiny.swordfish said:If Scott's decisions are no longer being sanctioned without scrutiny, he can't be surprised but must feel undermined
First team men's manager is a key role, possibly THE key role on the football side (Sorry Karen) so I would expect the rest of the UK directors to have an interest and sign off on who is chosen.
Whether that has changed or whether the US money men are now having an input we don't know.
After two failures Scott and the rest of the UK directors will most likely be under more scrutiny from the money men than before.
Or it could just be that Scott wants Jones and the others are saying "let's speak to Lee Johnson first and then we can decide".
Personally, I think in a well functioning leadership team it is should be good to discuss big decisions and get consensus.
Not that I'm sure we have a well functioning leadership team.
PS Putting Lee Johnson's name in the hat was just a joke....or was it?0 -
When you say 'board' what individuals are you referring to ? (I realise you may not be intending to be literal with that label).DubaiCAFC said:The board don’t all agree on Jones, so maybe not as close as some think
I find the description on the various announcements less than claer as to who our board comprises.
It could be a combination of all/any of the below (I think):Managing Director: James Rodwell (Chairman)
Group Finance Director: Ed Warrick
Technical Director: Andy Scott
Non-Executive Director: Paul Elliott CBE MBE
Non-Executive Director: Gavin Carter
Sporting Director Simon Lenagan
Steve Sutherland (as member of SMT)
PLUS the 'co-owners':Co-Owners:
Gabriel Brener and family
Joshua Friedman and family
Warren Rosenfeld and family
ACA Football Partners
Munir Javeri
Charlie Methven
Marc Boyan
0 -
Sounds like more dithering and bullshit.We’ve been here so many times before with so many different owners.
Makes you think we’ll actually end up with another middle of the road plodder like Appleton or Holden, not a more dynamic Nathan Jones, Gary Rowett appointment.Do they just want yes men or a guy who has the minerals to drag us up and out of this league?2 -
More like Jones is too expensive and they are going to go for plan B.Shit appointment incoming!7
-
If they (understandably) don’t trust Scott to appoint his third manager in a year then maybe they should sack him.10
- Sponsored links:
-
Why can't they put £10 million on Richard Madeley at 25-1, appoint him and collect the £250 million winnings. Sack Madeley after one game, pay him off with a 'drink', buy the Valley and Sparrows Lane and have money to straighten the club out.
Now that's what I would call gambling responsibly.30 -
I'd go back and check with your source if I was youDubaiCAFC said:
Not a chance with Lee Johnson..Henry Irving said:
You're making an assumption that his decisions on managerial appointments haven't always been with scrutiny.swordfish said:If Scott's decisions are no longer being sanctioned without scrutiny, he can't be surprised but must feel undermined
First team men's manager is a key role, possibly THE key role on the football side (Sorry Karen) so I would expect the rest of the UK directors to have an interest and sign off on who is chosen.
Whether that has changed or whether the US money men are now having an input we don't know.
After two failures Scott and the rest of the UK directors will most likely be under more scrutiny from the money men than before.
Or it could just be that Scott wants Jones and the others are saying "let's speak to Lee Johnson first and then we can decide".
Personally, I think in a well functioning leadership team it is should be good to discuss big decisions and get consensus.
Not that I'm sure we have a well functioning leadership team.
PS Putting Lee Johnson's name in the hat was just a joke....or was it?7 -
plenty of time for the new manager to get his own players in.RonnieMoore said:Would expect an announcement tomorrow as the last second interview was this morning .. that would give them the last day of the window if they wanted a couple in ..Didn’t one of the SMT say judge us at the end of the window by what we have done.
Think he was really referring to players in an out rather than manager sacked.2 -
Is it a wage issue?WPAddick said:
Do you know what reservations the board have about Jones?DubaiCAFC said:
Interestingly it is Scott got Jones..000__Jaaaaay__000 said:
Not really a surprise when one would imagine jones would want control whereas Scott won’t allow that otherwise he’s out of a job so probably advising not to proceedDubaiCAFC said:The board don’t all agree on Jones, so maybe not as close as some think0 -
Why haven't they interviewed the other guy in the past week...
Probably either incompetence, a poor process or that he's only just become available (Moore).0 -
With the dithering over sacking Appleton & now this, feels like we may have "football people" in charge but has not meant any more professional.
1 -
One of the owners is coming over most likey waiting for him to meet Jones before announcing it .. he due tomorrow14
-
Why would that make a difference?RonnieMoore said:One of the owners is coming over most likey waiting for him to meet Jones before announcing it .. he due tomorrow0 -
What about the Father, the son and the Holy Spiritvalleynick66 said:
When you say 'board' what individuals are you referring to ? (I realise you may not be intending to be literal with that label).DubaiCAFC said:The board don’t all agree on Jones, so maybe not as close as some think
I find the description on the various announcements less than claer as to who our board comprises.
It could be a combination of all/any of the below (I think):Managing Director: James Rodwell (Chairman)
Group Finance Director: Ed Warrick
Technical Director: Andy Scott
Non-Executive Director: Paul Elliott CBE MBE
Non-Executive Director: Gavin Carter
Sporting Director Simon Lenagan
Steve Sutherland (as member of SMT)
PLUS the 'co-owners':Co-Owners:
Gabriel Brener and family
Joshua Friedman and family
Warren Rosenfeld and family
ACA Football Partners
Munir Javeri
Charlie Methven
Marc Boyan
2 -
I struggle to think of managers I dislike more than Lee Johnson, plus I think that would condemn us to league 2Henry Irving said:
I'd go back and check with your source if I was youDubaiCAFC said:
Not a chance with Lee Johnson..Henry Irving said:
You're making an assumption that his decisions on managerial appointments haven't always been with scrutiny.swordfish said:If Scott's decisions are no longer being sanctioned without scrutiny, he can't be surprised but must feel undermined
First team men's manager is a key role, possibly THE key role on the football side (Sorry Karen) so I would expect the rest of the UK directors to have an interest and sign off on who is chosen.
Whether that has changed or whether the US money men are now having an input we don't know.
After two failures Scott and the rest of the UK directors will most likely be under more scrutiny from the money men than before.
Or it could just be that Scott wants Jones and the others are saying "let's speak to Lee Johnson first and then we can decide".
Personally, I think in a well functioning leadership team it is should be good to discuss big decisions and get consensus.
Not that I'm sure we have a well functioning leadership team.
PS Putting Lee Johnson's name in the hat was just a joke....or was it?12 - Sponsored links:
-
I'm starting to prepare to be totally underwhelmed7
-
This.AFKABartram said:Fascinating as it is, can someone start a new thread on where people live.If you’ve only got limited time to scan the forum, so many off topic posts can be a pain.Thanks in advance
These posts don't live on this thread! Ffs!1 -
DubaiCAFC said:The board don’t all agree on Jones, so maybe not as close as some think
Hmmm. Interesting....
0 -
Scott's got Farmer Jones; it's Welsh slang for piles. Scott's got pilesCallumcafc said:
Can you clarify this? You're saying you've heard Jones is Scott's choice? Or the opposite?DubaiCAFC said:
Interestingly it is Scott got Jones..000__Jaaaaay__000 said:
Not really a surprise when one would imagine jones would want control whereas Scott won’t allow that otherwise he’s out of a job so probably advising not to proceedDubaiCAFC said:The board don’t all agree on Jones, so maybe not as close as some think
Aloe Vera gel is your friend3 -
If Lee Johnson is appointed above the other names that have been mentioned then I am genuinely done with Charlton and football in general!!45
-
The thought of Lee Johnson managing us is awful.12
-
I don't even want to consider the thought of Lee Johnson being appointed. Would be a shambolic move.6
-
Look what u have started
3 -
Lee Johnson now 1/8 bookies favourite… 👀3
-
Where has this lee Johnson link come from? Please be Ronnie Moore 🙏🏻5
