Refereeing question for the experts out there - maybe @PeterGage or any others? Just rewatching the Stockport v Orient semifinal and noticed that when the ref gave the free kick for the goalkeeper picking up a back pass there was no indication from the ref that he considered it a back pass and that the goalie shouldn’t pick it up.
I thought the ref was supposed to signal this, like with a hand up or something? Did I just imagine this?
Just watched the Orient highlights. Stockport should have had at least one penalty which was blatant. What with the offside in the first leg, Orient have definitely had the luck of the decisions. But then Stockport had plenty of good chances in both games and it shouldn't have got to penalties.
Stockport can have no complaints really, they had some shocking decisions at Orient, that's true, but all they have to do is win a home game and they made a right bollocks of it.
They gave away a criminal goal early on and then missed some golden chances to win the game and paid the price.
Just watched the Orient highlights. Stockport should have had at least one penalty which was blatant. What with the offside in the first leg, Orient have definitely had the luck of the decisions. But then Stockport had plenty of good chances in both games and it shouldn't have got to penalties.
Stockport can have no complaints really, they had some shocking decisions at Orient, that's true, but all they have to do is win a home game and they made a right bollocks of it.
They gave away a criminal goal early on and then missed some golden chances to win the game and paid the price.
Just watched the Orient highlights. Stockport should have had at least one penalty which was blatant. What with the offside in the first leg, Orient have definitely had the luck of the decisions. But then Stockport had plenty of good chances in both games and it shouldn't have got to penalties.
Stockport can have no complaints really, they had some shocking decisions at Orient, that's true, but all they have to do is win a home game and they made a right bollocks of it.
They gave away a criminal goal early on and then missed some golden chances to win the game and paid the price.
Just watched the Orient highlights. Stockport should have had at least one penalty which was blatant. What with the offside in the first leg, Orient have definitely had the luck of the decisions. But then Stockport had plenty of good chances in both games and it shouldn't have got to penalties.
Stockport can have no complaints really, they had some shocking decisions at Orient, that's true, but all they have to do is win a home game and they made a right bollocks of it.
They gave away a criminal goal early on and then missed some golden chances to win the game and paid the price.
Its Sunderland in the West End of Wembley isnt it?
Tyrese Campbell for Sheff Utd is going to confuse the shit out of me - Wonder if this'll be a first, two Play-Off Finals in the EFL this season with two players involved with the same "name"
Comments
Just rewatching the Stockport v Orient semifinal and noticed that when the ref gave the free kick for the goalkeeper picking up a back pass there was no indication from the ref that he considered it a back pass and that the goalie shouldn’t pick it up.
Fist pup?
2 up at Orient as well.
Sunderland
Charlton
Wimbledon
East side:
Sheff Utd
Orient
Walsall
Tyrese Campbell for Sheff Utd is going to confuse the shit out of me - Wonder if this'll be a first, two Play-Off Finals in the EFL this season with two players involved with the same "name"
Subs: Davies, Seriki, McCallum, Holding, Brooks, O’Hare, Davies, Brereton Diaz, Cannon
Sunderland: Patterson; Hume, Ballard, O’Nien, Cirkin; Rigg, Neil (c), Bellingham, Le Fee; Mayenda, Mundle
Subs: Moore, Mepham, Hjelde, Samed, Jones, Roberts, Browne, Isidor, Watson
Poor showing from the club, not to communicate something like that