Transfer rumours thread (DEADLINE DAY starts page 300)
Comments
-
I wish people on here would realise that with these Belgians the fee for Lookman is completely irrelevant.12
-
Oliver Burke has just gone for 13mjohnbaker said:I would take 6m for someone who has played so little games. . . Talent but in our position at least it's a reasonable fee
0 -
.1
-
I wish people would stop saying this.BR7_addick said:I wish people on here would realise that with these Belgians the fee for Lookman is completely irrelevant.
6 -
Why?SWEnglandAddick said:
I wish people would stop saying this.BR7_addick said:I wish people on here would realise that with these Belgians the fee for Lookman is completely irrelevant.
1 -
Bolton teased there fans over an hour ago about announcing a signing...but still haven't done so. Hasn't gone down too well with their fans.12
-
6m is a good fee to be fair, I'd accept it from anyone but Palace.1
-
It's not what we are getting ( we can't spend it) it's who we are selling him to. Selling to them is unforgivablejohnbaker said:I would take 6m for someone who has played so little games. . . Talent but in our position at least it's a reasonable fee
3 -
If Lookman goes we better have at least two good replacements lined up!
And to Palace of all teams!0 - Sponsored links:
-
Please don't just post swear words. It means someone has to go in and edit your posts, which takes time that seriously could be better spent. Thanks10
-
Yes why, do you expect some sort of guarantee from Roland that we'll spend the 4/6/10mil on the squad? You'll be waiting a while if so.WSS said:
Why?SWEnglandAddick said:
I wish people would stop saying this.BR7_addick said:I wish people on here would realise that with these Belgians the fee for Lookman is completely irrelevant.
1 -
6million quid never to be seen again. All you saying you'd accept that are mad, we're never gonna see it invested.6
-
Shit, sorry.AFKABartram said:Please don't just post swear words. It means someone has to go in and edit your posts, which takes time that seriously could be better spent. Thanks
24 -
Yeh, it's Palarse.AFKABartram said:Please don't just post swear words. It means someone has to go in and edit your posts, which takes time that seriously could be better spent. Thanks
2 -
too true, 1m or 10m makes no real difference except if RD got 10m that is 100% profit and if he was willing he could sell the club for a more realistic amount. Lookman sale explains why decent offers, if true, were rejected for Fox. One major departure may be accepted but two would be intolerable.BR7_addick said:I wish people on here would realise that with these Belgians the fee for Lookman is completely irrelevant.
0 -
If Lookman goes to Palce then there should be a TOTAL BOYCOTT. Not only are the Duchbag and Liar shitting on us fans they are now rubbing salt in our wounds.4
-
Catastrophic day if we sell our best player to palarse . Another low supporting CAFC .3
-
It's been said today about 100 timesWSS said:
Why?SWEnglandAddick said:
I wish people would stop saying this.BR7_addick said:I wish people on here would realise that with these Belgians the fee for Lookman is completely irrelevant.
0 -
Sign Ulvestad and or Henry, announce at 10 and then sell Lookman to Palace and announce at 11.2
- Sponsored links:
-
Five years ago CP built a whole team with 1.5 million , this regime will just take the money out of the club12
-
Sign no one and announce at 11 that Lookman has gone you meanCroydonAddick1 said:Sign Ulvestad and or Henry, announce at 10 and then sell Lookman to Palace and announce at 11.
0 -
6m for Lookman and replaced with a loan from Burnley who has played 7 games since he signed in 2015.
We all know the incoming hold up is because we haven't moved Texeira and Ba on. They've now gone to plan b and shifted Lookman.
Can someone clarify how many have come in and how many have left aince Russel's famous "we are 5-6 players short" interview?1 -
If there are two good offers, I am sure RD would have no problem taking the flakLargeAddick said:
too true, 1m or 10m makes no real difference except if RD got 10m that is 100% profit and if he was willing he could sell the club for a more realistic amount. Lookman sale explains why decent offers, if true, were rejected for Fox. One major departure may be accepted but two would be intolerable.BR7_addick said:I wish people on here would realise that with these Belgians the fee for Lookman is completely irrelevant.
0 -
You mean...CroydonAddick1 said:Sign Ulvestad and or Henry, announce at 10 and then sell Lookman to Palace and announce at 11.
10:25pm sign Ulvestad
10:29pm sell Lookman
10:30pm sign Henry
I think they call that a sh*t sandwich. :-)2 -
That 6 million for Lookman just bolsters Roland's wank fest for another season. Who are they going to sign with that money, at 9.00pm on deadline day?? Nobody.
It will just plug the gap until next season when they sell Konsa and Hanlan.0 -
Waiting for the AA for a tow homeLaddick01 said:Olly Groome still there. Either way something is happening.
5 -
If this happens Pinocchio won't stop smirking for the next month.0
-
I see the missive about the use of swear words was headed then
.
0 -
Gone.
The shops be back later.0