Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Katie Hopkins reported to the police by the Society of Black Lawyers.

12357…12

Comments

  • SantaClaus
    SantaClaus Posts: 7,654
    Can she write this pay off against tax? You could argue that it's a legitimate business expense in her line of work.
  • captainbob
    captainbob Posts: 941
    Henry Irving said:

    Bow_Addick said:

    Henry Irving said:

    buckshee said:

    smudge7946 said:

    Surely Katie should give the money to charity instead. As a fervent anti capitalist Monroe would surely hate to be given so much money. Unless her principals have suddenly changed.

    Nah , she'll probably play the victim instead , usually does.
    Well in this case she clearly was the victim which is how she won the case.

    I'd never heard of hear before this case but it was a nasty and false slur. Yet Monroe is the one you're attacking?
    Monroe isn't as innocent and lovely as you'd like to think.
    A privileged gobshite who attempted to use migrants as a way of humiliating Hopkins to settle a personal dispute.
    I have no view on her as I've never heard of her before this.

    I dont think she's innocent or lovely and never said she was. Why did you need to make up that I did think that?
    Sue him, Mr Henry.
  • Robbo on the wing
    Robbo on the wing Posts: 4,135
    For (at times) having the bollocks to say what a lot are thinking.
  • Robbo on the wing
    Robbo on the wing Posts: 4,135
    edited April 2017
    That's your opinion and you are entitled to it, as am I with mine.
  • Bournemouth Addick
    Bournemouth Addick Posts: 16,283
    Henry Irving said:

    Bow_Addick said:

    Henry Irving said:

    buckshee said:

    smudge7946 said:

    Surely Katie should give the money to charity instead. As a fervent anti capitalist Monroe would surely hate to be given so much money. Unless her principals have suddenly changed.

    Nah , she'll probably play the victim instead , usually does.
    Well in this case she clearly was the victim which is how she won the case.

    I'd never heard of hear before this case but it was a nasty and false slur. Yet Monroe is the one you're attacking?
    Monroe isn't as innocent and lovely as you'd like to think.
    A privileged gobshite who attempted to use migrants as a way of humiliating Hopkins to settle a personal dispute.
    I have no view on her as I've never heard of her before this.

    I dont think she's innocent or lovely and never said she was. Why did you need to make up that I did think that?
    image
  • Garrymanilow
    Garrymanilow Posts: 13,170
    Robbo on the wing said:

    That's your opinion and you are entitled to it, as am I with mine.

    Quite.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5WTkaQ6S8g
  • ValleyGary
    ValleyGary Posts: 37,981
    Would take great pleasure in seeing Hopkins have to hand over all the money she's earned being a mouthy dick for basically being a mouthy dick.
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,315
    Robbo on the wing said:

    JorgeCosta said:

    She is such a twat. Jack Monroe only wanted her to apologise. But she wouldn't. Cost her loads.

    I have an impeccable source for this.

    She didn't want to pay £5k to the charity suggested.
    She has now got to stump up a bucketload.
    Say what you like, but at least she stuck to her morals.
    I like the strong character that she is, so to go against the grain on this topic, actually like the woman.
    I can't get over this. She stuck to her morals of wrongly accusing someone of something? If those are morals you admire then I'd question your moral integrity too.
  • AddickUpNorth
    AddickUpNorth Posts: 8,325
    You know the phrase 'I wouldn't piss on *insert name* if they were on fire'? Well, if I saw Katie Hopkins on fire I would piss on her......BUT......only if I developed the ability to urinate petrol.
    She's an odious and disgusting oxygen thief. A couple more results like this and I hope the bitch ends up scavenging out of bins.
  • Sponsored links:



  • Algarveaddick
    Algarveaddick Posts: 21,155
    Bow_Addick said:

    Henry Irving said:

    buckshee said:

    smudge7946 said:

    Surely Katie should give the money to charity instead. As a fervent anti capitalist Monroe would surely hate to be given so much money. Unless her principals have suddenly changed.

    Nah , she'll probably play the victim instead , usually does.
    Well in this case she clearly was the victim which is how she won the case.

    I'd never heard of hear before this case but it was a nasty and false slur. Yet Monroe is the one you're attacking?
    Monroe isn't as innocent and lovely as you'd like to think.
    A privileged gobshite who attempted to use migrants as a way of humiliating Hopkins to settle a personal dispute.
    What's the story behind this BA?
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,315
    Algarveaddick said:

    Bow_Addick said:

    Henry Irving said:

    buckshee said:

    smudge7946 said:

    Surely Katie should give the money to charity instead. As a fervent anti capitalist Monroe would surely hate to be given so much money. Unless her principals have suddenly changed.

    Nah , she'll probably play the victim instead , usually does.
    Well in this case she clearly was the victim which is how she won the case.

    I'd never heard of hear before this case but it was a nasty and false slur. Yet Monroe is the one you're attacking?
    Monroe isn't as innocent and lovely as you'd like to think.
    A privileged gobshite who attempted to use migrants as a way of humiliating Hopkins to settle a personal dispute.
    What's the story behind this BA?
    I'm just firing up Argument Alert brb
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,335
    smudge7946 said:

    Surely Katie should give the money to charity instead. As a fervent anti capitalist Monroe would surely hate to be given so much money. Unless her principals have suddenly changed.

    One of the two parties in the case refused to make a donation to charity. That's what kicked off litigation. It wasn't Jack Monroe.
  • Algarveaddick
    Algarveaddick Posts: 21,155
    Robbo on the wing said:

    For (at times) having the bollocks to say what a lot are thinking.

    It's almost always a pretty lousy way of thinking though. And sometimes, as in this case, what she thinks and says is a down right lie.

    As was her claim that Londoners were cowed and afraid after the recent attacks.

    I can't admire anyone as nasty, spiteful and vitriolic as her, some things are best left unsaid.
  • Algarveaddick
    Algarveaddick Posts: 21,155
    Leuth said:

    Algarveaddick said:

    Bow_Addick said:

    Henry Irving said:

    buckshee said:

    smudge7946 said:

    Surely Katie should give the money to charity instead. As a fervent anti capitalist Monroe would surely hate to be given so much money. Unless her principals have suddenly changed.

    Nah , she'll probably play the victim instead , usually does.
    Well in this case she clearly was the victim which is how she won the case.

    I'd never heard of hear before this case but it was a nasty and false slur. Yet Monroe is the one you're attacking?
    Monroe isn't as innocent and lovely as you'd like to think.
    A privileged gobshite who attempted to use migrants as a way of humiliating Hopkins to settle a personal dispute.
    What's the story behind this BA?
    I'm just firing up Argument Alert brb
    LOL - Seriously though, I am only asking when Monroe used migrants as a way of humiliating Hopkins, I'm not aware of the story and I'm not looking for an argument, just a bit of background.
  • MrOneLung
    MrOneLung Posts: 26,855
    She's a version of a shock jock.

    It is her job to be outrageous and near the knuckle and provoke reactions and looks like she does just that reading some of these comments.
  • DaveMehmet
    DaveMehmet Posts: 21,601
    ValleyGary said:

    Would take great pleasure in seeing Hopkins have to hand over all the money she's earned being a mouthy dick for basically being a mouthy dick.

    So we'll put you down as a maybe?
  • buckshee
    buckshee Posts: 7,867
    Henry Irving said:

    buckshee said:

    smudge7946 said:

    Surely Katie should give the money to charity instead. As a fervent anti capitalist Monroe would surely hate to be given so much money. Unless her principals have suddenly changed.

    Nah , she'll probably play the victim instead , usually does.
    Well in this case she clearly was the victim which is how she won the case.

    I'd never heard of hear before this case but it was a nasty and false slur. Yet Monroe is the one you're attacking?
    Nope , I think they're both twats.
  • Chaz Hill
    Chaz Hill Posts: 5,217
    Leuth said:

    Robbo on the wing said:

    JorgeCosta said:

    She is such a twat. Jack Monroe only wanted her to apologise. But she wouldn't. Cost her loads.

    I have an impeccable source for this.

    She didn't want to pay £5k to the charity suggested.
    She has now got to stump up a bucketload.
    Say what you like, but at least she stuck to her morals.
    I like the strong character that she is, so to go against the grain on this topic, actually like the woman.
    I can't get over this. She stuck to her morals of wrongly accusing someone of something? If those are morals you admire then I'd question your moral integrity too.
    Surprised her 'followers' haven't started a JustGiving page to help her out :-)
  • Sponsored links:



  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,335
    Chaz Hill said:

    Leuth said:

    Robbo on the wing said:

    JorgeCosta said:

    She is such a twat. Jack Monroe only wanted her to apologise. But she wouldn't. Cost her loads.

    I have an impeccable source for this.

    She didn't want to pay £5k to the charity suggested.
    She has now got to stump up a bucketload.
    Say what you like, but at least she stuck to her morals.
    I like the strong character that she is, so to go against the grain on this topic, actually like the woman.
    I can't get over this. She stuck to her morals of wrongly accusing someone of something? If those are morals you admire then I'd question your moral integrity too.
    Surprised her 'followers' haven't started a JustGiving page to help her out :-)
    They have. And it's going surprisingly well. https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/katie-hopkins-libel
  • Chaz Hill
    Chaz Hill Posts: 5,217
    Chizz said:

    Chaz Hill said:

    Leuth said:

    Robbo on the wing said:

    JorgeCosta said:

    She is such a twat. Jack Monroe only wanted her to apologise. But she wouldn't. Cost her loads.

    I have an impeccable source for this.

    She didn't want to pay £5k to the charity suggested.
    She has now got to stump up a bucketload.
    Say what you like, but at least she stuck to her morals.
    I like the strong character that she is, so to go against the grain on this topic, actually like the woman.
    I can't get over this. She stuck to her morals of wrongly accusing someone of something? If those are morals you admire then I'd question your moral integrity too.
    Surprised her 'followers' haven't started a JustGiving page to help her out :-)
    They have. And it's going surprisingly well. https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/katie-hopkins-libel
    Unbelievable. Expect a few on here will have chipped in!
  • Curb_It
    Curb_It Posts: 21,223
    Chaz Hill said:

    Chizz said:

    Chaz Hill said:

    Leuth said:

    Robbo on the wing said:

    JorgeCosta said:

    She is such a twat. Jack Monroe only wanted her to apologise. But she wouldn't. Cost her loads.

    I have an impeccable source for this.

    She didn't want to pay £5k to the charity suggested.
    She has now got to stump up a bucketload.
    Say what you like, but at least she stuck to her morals.
    I like the strong character that she is, so to go against the grain on this topic, actually like the woman.
    I can't get over this. She stuck to her morals of wrongly accusing someone of something? If those are morals you admire then I'd question your moral integrity too.
    Surprised her 'followers' haven't started a JustGiving page to help her out :-)
    They have. And it's going surprisingly well. https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/katie-hopkins-libel
    Unbelievable. Expect a few on here will have chipped in!
    I don't think you clicked the link?!

  • SuedeAdidas
    SuedeAdidas Posts: 7,741
    I think it's safe to say that Allison isn't about to donate......'spunk trumpet'
  • Chaz Hill
    Chaz Hill Posts: 5,217
    Curb_It said:

    Chaz Hill said:

    Chizz said:

    Chaz Hill said:

    Leuth said:

    Robbo on the wing said:

    JorgeCosta said:

    She is such a twat. Jack Monroe only wanted her to apologise. But she wouldn't. Cost her loads.

    I have an impeccable source for this.

    She didn't want to pay £5k to the charity suggested.
    She has now got to stump up a bucketload.
    Say what you like, but at least she stuck to her morals.
    I like the strong character that she is, so to go against the grain on this topic, actually like the woman.
    I can't get over this. She stuck to her morals of wrongly accusing someone of something? If those are morals you admire then I'd question your moral integrity too.
    Surprised her 'followers' haven't started a JustGiving page to help her out :-)
    They have. And it's going surprisingly well. https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/katie-hopkins-libel
    Unbelievable. Expect a few on here will have chipped in!
    I don't think you clicked the link?!

    No I hadn't. Was worried it was going well :-) Come on robbo on the wing and buckshee etc. Help the lady out.
  • Addickted
    Addickted Posts: 19,456
    SuedeAdidas said:

    I think it's safe to say that Allison isn't about to donate......'spunk trumpet'

    I doubt Swansea Crown Court would be too happy about one of their employees writing that for the World to see.



  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,335
    Addickted said:

    SuedeAdidas said:

    I think it's safe to say that Allison isn't about to donate......'spunk trumpet'

    I doubt Swansea Crown Court would be too happy about one of their employees writing that for the World to see.



    If it's not true, she could always sue.

    *gets popcorn*
  • SuedeAdidas
    SuedeAdidas Posts: 7,741
    Chizz said:

    Addickted said:

    SuedeAdidas said:

    I think it's safe to say that Allison isn't about to donate......'spunk trumpet'

    I doubt Swansea Crown Court would be too happy about one of their employees writing that for the World to see.



    If it's not true, she could always sue.

    *gets popcorn*
    Correct. I see her more as a spunk euphonium.
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,335
    SuedeAdidas said:

    Chizz said:

    Addickted said:

    SuedeAdidas said:

    I think it's safe to say that Allison isn't about to donate......'spunk trumpet'

    I doubt Swansea Crown Court would be too happy about one of their employees writing that for the World to see.



    If it's not true, she could always sue.

    *gets popcorn*
    Correct. I see her more as a spunk euphonium.
    *No offence to spunk euphoniums
  • JorgeCosta
    JorgeCosta Posts: 1,035
    Bow_Addick said:

    Henry Irving said:

    buckshee said:

    smudge7946 said:

    Surely Katie should give the money to charity instead. As a fervent anti capitalist Monroe would surely hate to be given so much money. Unless her principals have suddenly changed.

    Nah , she'll probably play the victim instead , usually does.
    Well in this case she clearly was the victim which is how she won the case.

    I'd never heard of hear before this case but it was a nasty and false slur. Yet Monroe is the one you're attacking?
    Monroe isn't as innocent and lovely as you'd like to think.
    A privileged gobshite who attempted to use migrants as a way of humiliating Hopkins to settle a personal dispute.
    You are way off beam there. Far from privileged.

Categories

“Marketplace”