Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

The General Election - June 8th 2017

15960626465320

Comments

  • bobmunro
    bobmunro Posts: 20,843
    seth plum said:

    Addickted said:

    Edit as it's a stupid idea.

    I do find it amazing that the Tories have a run away lead in the opinion polls and seem to be increasing their share of the vote across the board, yet some very valid points are being made as to their failings - yet none of it seems to have the desired effect in changing the views of the 'silent majority' - with the exception of @Fiiish


    Validity is not important any more. Other things seem to drive votes, not detail, but repeated slogans, and what people look like, and the way messages are selected and put across.
    The Tory party, and indeed the Labour party too probably don't need to worry much about the detail of their policies when people don't seem to be guided by them any more.
    What people look like? Are you sure??

    image
  • guinnessaddick
    guinnessaddick Posts: 28,620

    I might return to the UK with a bang and start up me own party, show em whats what.

    Who's with me?

    I'll look into it.
  • Stig
    Stig Posts: 29,022


    Leuth said:

    Exercise in ideology? What about the Tories, are they not an exercise in ideology?

    If Corbyn had the looks of David Beckham and the gravitas of Obama then he could propose every single policy he is already proposing and SHG would be on board. Fact.

    Tories dont have an ideology. Or at least a core founding ideology. It's the reason they've existed for centuries and been able to adapt.
    Many years ago I took a social sciences course with the OU. The basis of the course was to take four ideologies, (liberalism, social reformism, marxism and conservatism) and apply them to different fields of study. When we got to the summer school we were told in no uncertain terms that whatever it said in the course modules, there is not really any such thing as conservative ideology. The three ideologies that the course was originally based on were liberalism, social reformism and marxism. These are all are well thought out, well researched, and have the necessary explanatory reach and explanatory depth to be considered an ideology. There isn't really a consistent conservative ideology, but they felt they had to include something because of tacit threats to the university's funding from the, then, Conservative government.
  • Addickted said:

    Edit as it's a stupid idea.

    I do find it amazing that the Tories have a run away lead in the opinion polls and seem to be increasing their share of the vote across the board, yet some very valid points are being made as to their failings - yet none of it seems to have the desired effect in changing the views of the 'silent majority' - with the exception of @Fiiish


    I think what we are seeing is our old friend Confirmation Bias at work.

    It doesn't matter that we've had 7 years of austerity that has failed to eliminate the deficit, all our public services systematically being dismantled, 100,000"s public sector jobs going, our health and care system teetering on collapse, our prisons on the point of exploding, our police struggling to cope with fewer and fewer officers, weak if any economic growth, stagnant wages and the rise of zero hours contracts, massive rises in homelessness and people unable to put a meal in front of their children without charit, our armed forces struggling to properly equip fewer personnel and much more.

    None of that matters and it does not have any effect how many charts and graphs or graphics or statistical analysis you back your point up with if the facts don't fit the recipients existing theory. We are conditioned to ignore or denigrate facts that challenge our accepted wisdom.

    We've all got it to one extent or another of course and yes, it does cut the other way too of course.
  • Fiiish
    Fiiish Posts: 7,998

    Addickted said:

    Edit as it's a stupid idea.

    I do find it amazing that the Tories have a run away lead in the opinion polls and seem to be increasing their share of the vote across the board, yet some very valid points are being made as to their failings - yet none of it seems to have the desired effect in changing the views of the 'silent majority' - with the exception of @Fiiish


    I think what we are seeing is our old friend Confirmation Bias at work.

    It doesn't matter that we've had 7 years of austerity that has failed to eliminate the deficit, all our public services systematically being dismantled, 100,000"s public sector jobs going, our health and care system teetering on collapse, our prisons on the point of exploding, our police struggling to cope with fewer and fewer officers, weak if any economic growth, stagnant wages and the rise of zero hours contracts, massive rises in homelessness and people unable to put a meal in front of their children without charit, our armed forces struggling to properly equip fewer personnel and much more.

    None of that matters and it does not have any effect how many charts and graphs or graphics or statistical analysis you back your point up with if the facts don't fit the recipients existing theory. We are conditioned to ignore or denigrate facts that challenge our accepted wisdom.

    We've all got it to one extent or another of course and yes, it does cut the other way too of course.
    So I'm immune from confirmation bias then?
  • razil
    razil Posts: 15,041
    The reason is fairly obvious mainly down to one thing, and that is leadership approval ratings - May's is stratospheric, Corbyn's subterranean, until that changes the Tories can and will get away with murder
  • Fiiish said:

    Addickted said:

    Edit as it's a stupid idea.

    I do find it amazing that the Tories have a run away lead in the opinion polls and seem to be increasing their share of the vote across the board, yet some very valid points are being made as to their failings - yet none of it seems to have the desired effect in changing the views of the 'silent majority' - with the exception of @Fiiish


    I think what we are seeing is our old friend Confirmation Bias at work.

    It doesn't matter that we've had 7 years of austerity that has failed to eliminate the deficit, all our public services systematically being dismantled, 100,000"s public sector jobs going, our health and care system teetering on collapse, our prisons on the point of exploding, our police struggling to cope with fewer and fewer officers, weak if any economic growth, stagnant wages and the rise of zero hours contracts, massive rises in homelessness and people unable to put a meal in front of their children without charit, our armed forces struggling to properly equip fewer personnel and much more.

    None of that matters and it does not have any effect how many charts and graphs or graphics or statistical analysis you back your point up with if the facts don't fit the recipients existing theory. We are conditioned to ignore or denigrate facts that challenge our accepted wisdom.

    We've all got it to one extent or another of course and yes, it does cut the other way too of course.
    So I'm immune from confirmation bias then?
    I'm still working on the assumption of alien abduction.
  • aliwibble
    aliwibble Posts: 26,290

    I'm the same. I cannot see how anyone could vote for a party that calls themselves socialists...and are actually proud of that as if socialism is actually a good thing.

    So what makes you think socialism _isn't_ a good thing Nick?
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,332


    Leuth said:

    Exercise in ideology? What about the Tories, are they not an exercise in ideology?

    If Corbyn had the looks of David Beckham and the gravitas of Obama then he could propose every single policy he is already proposing and SHG would be on board. Fact.

    Tories dont have an ideology. Or at least a core founding ideology. It's the reason they've existed for centuries and been able to adapt.
    Centuries?
  • McBobbin
    McBobbin Posts: 12,051
    Chizz said:


    Leuth said:

    Exercise in ideology? What about the Tories, are they not an exercise in ideology?

    If Corbyn had the looks of David Beckham and the gravitas of Obama then he could propose every single policy he is already proposing and SHG would be on board. Fact.

    Tories dont have an ideology. Or at least a core founding ideology. It's the reason they've existed for centuries and been able to adapt.
    Centuries?
    They have a lot in common with Henry VIII
  • Sponsored links:



  • NornIrishAddick
    NornIrishAddick Posts: 9,623
    edited May 2017
    Chizz said:


    Leuth said:

    Exercise in ideology? What about the Tories, are they not an exercise in ideology?

    If Corbyn had the looks of David Beckham and the gravitas of Obama then he could propose every single policy he is already proposing and SHG would be on board. Fact.

    Tories dont have an ideology. Or at least a core founding ideology. It's the reason they've existed for centuries and been able to adapt.
    Centuries?
    Well, the Whigs and Tories were around in the Seventeenth Century - Tory, interestingly enough (or perhaps not), was originally a term of abuse, derived from a term for an Irish highwayman (along with Rapparee, which is a word that I prefer).
  • Cordoban Addick
    Cordoban Addick Posts: 5,448

    Chizz said:


    Leuth said:

    Exercise in ideology? What about the Tories, are they not an exercise in ideology?

    If Corbyn had the looks of David Beckham and the gravitas of Obama then he could propose every single policy he is already proposing and SHG would be on board. Fact.

    Tories dont have an ideology. Or at least a core founding ideology. It's the reason they've existed for centuries and been able to adapt.
    Centuries?
    Well, the Whigs and Tories were around in the Seventeenth Century - Tory, interestingly enough (or perhaps not), was originally a term of abuse, derived from a term for an Irish highwayman (along with Rapparee, which is a word that I prefer).
    If the cap fits...
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 51,995
    bobmunro said:

    I might return to the UK with a bang and start up me own party, show em whats what.

    Who's with me?

    Colin
    Who the fucks Colin when hes at home? Is he proper militant who dont give two shits? Coz if he is, hes in and he can be my minister for education.

    Anyone else?
    A question that has often been asked but never satisfactorily answered.
    Colin Sams aka bexleyboy, who seems to live in an alternative reality.
  • Holdkneebomb
    Holdkneebomb Posts: 1,262
    Excellent piece by Andrew rawnsley today
  • PragueAddick
    PragueAddick Posts: 22,144

    Excellent piece by Andrew rawnsley today

    Agree. But then you read the comments below it and find the Corbynistas in complete denial.

  • Red_in_SE8
    Red_in_SE8 Posts: 5,961
    I have read this once. Need to read it again to fully grasp what it means. The observations are absolutely terrifying.

    https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/may/07/the-great-british-brexit-robbery-hijacked-democracy
  • Fiiish
    Fiiish Posts: 7,998
    edited May 2017

    Addickted said:

    Edit as it's a stupid idea.

    I do find it amazing that the Tories have a run away lead in the opinion polls and seem to be increasing their share of the vote across the board, yet some very valid points are being made as to their failings - yet none of it seems to have the desired effect in changing the views of the 'silent majority' - with the exception of @Fiiish


    I think what we are seeing is our old friend Confirmation Bias at work.

    It doesn't matter that we've had 7 years of austerity that has failed to eliminate the deficit, all our public services systematically being dismantled, 100,000"s public sector jobs going, our health and care system teetering on collapse, our prisons on the point of exploding, our police struggling to cope with fewer and fewer officers, weak if any economic growth, stagnant wages and the rise of zero hours contracts, massive rises in homelessness and people unable to put a meal in front of their children without charit, our armed forces struggling to properly equip fewer personnel and much more.

    None of that matters and it does not have any effect how many charts and graphs or graphics or statistical analysis you back your point up with if the facts don't fit the recipients existing theory. We are conditioned to ignore or denigrate facts that challenge our accepted wisdom.

    We've all got it to one extent or another of course and yes, it does cut the other way too of course.
    What will it take though? What will the breaking point be where common sense overrides confirmation bias?

    Governments need to change. In my memory there has been Major to Blair and Brown to Cameron. Major by comparison to May was an incredibly competent administrator, certainly not a sociopath hellbent on imposing her idyllic 1950s Oxfordshire village, WI & grammar school fantasy on the rest of the country.

    So what will it be for our voters to realise what a fucking disaster this lot of Tories are? How many more A&E departments need to fail? How many more schools need to descend into chaos? How many more poor, disabled and homeless need to die unnecessarily? How many more crimes? How much more corruption?

    I feel that social media is partly to blame. The echo chamber mentality and the fact that people rarely discuss politics face-to-face anymore means people become more resilient to facts that challenge their views and instead only imbibe opinions and mantras that reinforce their beliefs. This does go both ways for both Labour and Tories, and indeed for pro and anti Corbyn Labour voters as well.
  • stonemuse
    stonemuse Posts: 34,000

    I have read this once. Need to read it again to fully grasp what it means. The observations are absolutely terrifying.

    https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/may/07/the-great-british-brexit-robbery-hijacked-democracy

    That's certainly a conspiracy theory and a half.

    Far too much to grasp in one read but initial thoughts are that some of the 'links' are rather tenuous. Fascinating read though.
  • Sheepie1985
    Sheepie1985 Posts: 480
    aliwibble said:

    I'm the same. I cannot see how anyone could vote for a party that calls themselves socialists...and are actually proud of that as if socialism is actually a good thing.

    So what makes you think socialism _isn't_ a good thing Nick?
    I've been asking this question to anyone who disagrees with socialism, I'm yet to have a single reply...
  • kentaddick
    kentaddick Posts: 18,729
    edited May 2017

    aliwibble said:

    I'm the same. I cannot see how anyone could vote for a party that calls themselves socialists...and are actually proud of that as if socialism is actually a good thing.

    So what makes you think socialism _isn't_ a good thing Nick?
    I've been asking this question to anyone who disagrees with socialism, I'm yet to have a single reply...
    Well, it honestly depends on what you mean by socialism? Some socialist ideas are good when implemented into a capitalist system. That doesn't mean that all out socialism would be great, just like all out capitalism is not great.

    I'd just say that i don't believe our system of government should be tied rigidly to an ideology that was created 200 odd years ago by an average philosopher. Any ideology is doomed to fail with the passing of time and needs to be adapted.
  • Sponsored links:



  • smudge7946
    smudge7946 Posts: 4,131
    aliwibble said:

    I'm the same. I cannot see how anyone could vote for a party that calls themselves socialists...and are actually proud of that as if socialism is actually a good thing.

    So what makes you think socialism _isn't_ a good thing Nick?
    USSR
    Cuba
    Venezuela
    Chezchoslovakia
    East Germany
    Hungary
    Poland
    Albania
    North Korea
    China
    Romania
    Etc


  • bobmunro
    bobmunro Posts: 20,843

    aliwibble said:

    I'm the same. I cannot see how anyone could vote for a party that calls themselves socialists...and are actually proud of that as if socialism is actually a good thing.

    So what makes you think socialism _isn't_ a good thing Nick?
    USSR
    Cuba
    Venezuela
    Chezchoslovakia
    East Germany
    Hungary
    Poland
    Albania
    North Korea
    China
    Romania
    Etc


    So that's a list of current and former communist states - although not Markist that's for sure.

    If being left is communism then surely being right is fascism? Hang on - thinking about Saint Theresa you may have a point.
  • CharltonMadrid
    CharltonMadrid Posts: 5,091

    aliwibble said:

    I'm the same. I cannot see how anyone could vote for a party that calls themselves socialists...and are actually proud of that as if socialism is actually a good thing.

    So what makes you think socialism _isn't_ a good thing Nick?
    USSR
    Cuba
    Venezuela
    Chezchoslovakia
    East Germany
    Hungary
    Poland
    Albania
    North Korea
    China
    Romania
    Etc


    All communist, surely? Bit of a difference.
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,314

    I have read this once. Need to read it again to fully grasp what it means. The observations are absolutely terrifying.

    https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/may/07/the-great-british-brexit-robbery-hijacked-democracy

    Everyone should read this
  • soapy_jones
    soapy_jones Posts: 21,352
    The bit about the flesh eating aliens and city sized flying saucers was the best bit!
  • McBobbin
    McBobbin Posts: 12,051
    Are Scandinavian countries socialist? That's a model I'd like here. Decent public services which people are happy to contribute to.
  • ShootersHillGuru
    ShootersHillGuru Posts: 50,619
    I remember someone (Red_in_SE8 ?) suggesting that the troll whose name I can't remember who immediately vanished from this site post referendum was a paid employee of some leave supporting group. I thought at the time it was fanciful but I wonder.

    Was this vibrant and lively forum discussion picked up by online data scanning and targeted ?
  • PragueAddick
    PragueAddick Posts: 22,144
    edited May 2017

    I remember someone (Red_in_SE8 ?) suggesting that the troll whose name I can't remember who immediately vanished from this site post referendum was a paid employee of some leave supporting group. I thought at the time it was fanciful but I wonder.

    Was this vibrant and lively forum discussion picked up by online data scanning and targeted ?

    Charlton 1969, I think.

    Very odd intervention, wasn't it?

    I've got my doubts about the motives of another regular visitor, but cannot prove anything. Knowing what I know about Russian backed intervention in Czech social media - it is far more brazen than in the UK - I think we are right to be watchful.


  • ShootersHillGuru
    ShootersHillGuru Posts: 50,619

    I remember someone (Red_in_SE8 ?) suggesting that the troll whose name I can't remember who immediately vanished from this site post referendum was a paid employee of some leave supporting group. I thought at the time it was fanciful but I wonder.

    Was this vibrant and lively forum discussion picked up by online data scanning and targeted ?

    Charlton 1969, I think.

    Very odd intervention, wasn't it?

    I've got my doubts about the motives of another regular visitor, but cannot prove anything. Knowing what I know about Russian backed intervention in Czech social media - it is far more brazen than in the UK - I think we are right to be watchful.


    Can I just add what a fine job Mr. Bannon and Mercer are doing and in no way am I sceptical or concerned about their motives.

  • Addickted
    Addickted Posts: 19,456

    I remember someone (Red_in_SE8 ?) suggesting that the troll whose name I can't remember who immediately vanished from this site post referendum was a paid employee of some leave supporting group. I thought at the time it was fanciful but I wonder.

    Was this vibrant and lively forum discussion picked up by online data scanning and targeted ?

    Charlton 1969, I think.

    Very odd intervention, wasn't it?

    I've got my doubts about the motives of another regular visitor, but cannot prove anything. Knowing what I know about Russian backed intervention in Czech social media - it is far more brazen than in the UK - I think we are right to be watchful.


    You had him sussed fairly early on @PragueAddick. However, he did sometimes post the occasional gem amongst the piles of dross.

    Spill the beans on who else you believe is a plant?

This discussion has been closed.