Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Ownership clarify discretionary staff bonus situation

https://www.cafc.co.uk/news/view/5baa04522fa5b/ownership-clarify-discretionary-staff-bonus-situation


An article, which first appeared on the Daily Mail website on August 20th, said that staff were considering legal action against the owner for unpaid bonuses.
In June 2017 Charlton Athletic decided to give staff discretionary bonuses because the club covered operational losses with high income from player sales resulting in a profit of £1.4m ((EBITDA + £6m) during the 2016/17 season. In 2017/18 the operational losses grew and the player sales were much lower. This was mainly because of the ongoing sale of the club which caused our CEO to leave resulting in delayed player sales and delay in actions being taken to make the club more cost efficient. Last season the club lost £10m (EBITDA loss £5.5m) and as a consequence the decision was taken not to grant discretionary bonuses, all contractual bonuses are being paid. The ownership can confirm that to date no legal action has been taken against the club on the issue of discretionary staff bonuses.
In the meantime the club investigated how this issue became national news in the UK and beyond, a significant blow to the reputation of the club and owner and to the ability of the owner to sell the club.
On August 20th, before the decision not to pay a discretionary bonus was communicated to the employees, the article on the Daily Mail website appeared.
After the club confirmed on August 22nd that no bonuses will be granted for last season but contractual bonuses would be paid, the owner received an unsigned letter from “the administrative staff at The Valley” – there was no mention of the employees at the training ground. This letter was received at 4.35pm and was Tweeted out by CARD at 5.53pm. Their communication made it appear as if all employees were involved, that the bonuses were an obligation and that consequently the club was failing to fulfil its contractual obligations to its employees. An employee or small group tried to use the external pressure from the media to get their discretionary bonus despite the huge reputational damage to the club. It is unclear if a majority of the employees at The Valley supported the external communication of this letter, although it was written in their name, since nobody signed this letter to the owner. Although CARD has been very keen that the club’s management should always be accurate, the requirement does not seem to apply to their own communication.
The ownership believes the fans and the EFL deserve to know what really happened as the truth has been misrepresented.
Another recent example of the relativity of “truth” for CARD is when they recently wrote they “were disgusted to hear that Roland Duchatelet, our billionaire owner, is no longer willing to pay for academy players to drink water or eat breakfast at the club’s training ground".
The academy players still have access to water at all times, now they have refillable bottles rather than plastic water bottles. The ownership continues to invest £2.2m per year in the Academy, which is considerably more than the majority of League One clubs invest.
«1345678

Comments

  • seth plum
    seth plum Posts: 53,448
    Here we go.
  • Croydon
    Croydon Posts: 12,728
    Yet another official statement not being posted on the club's social media channels.
  • {.....}
  • Rubbershoes desperately trying to earn his keep?
  • Missed It
    Missed It Posts: 2,734
    "Discretionary" - the magic word.

    Has PR Tom been on holiday for a month though?
  • stonemuse
    stonemuse Posts: 34,002
    Missed It said:

    "Discretionary" - the magic word.

    Has PR Tom been on holiday for a month though?

    Had to do their ‘investigation’ first ... seems they didn’t find anyone to blame so decided to go for CARD instead.
  • cafc999
    cafc999 Posts: 4,967
    Just as the dust settles CAFC decide to resurrect the article.

    I thought Tom Rubbishow would know better
  • Rudders22
    Rudders22 Posts: 3,864
    Call me naive but if that is believable why has it taken up since August 20th to September 25th September to come up with that statement. If that was the truth why did they not publish it back then..
  • Sponsored links:



  • cafc999
    cafc999 Posts: 4,967
    No mention of the club telling lies about the EFL awaiting papers from the aussies though
  • stonemuse
    stonemuse Posts: 34,002
    ‘... significant blow to the reputation of the club and owner and to the ability of the owner to sell the club‘

    They still can’t admit it’s because the price is too high.
  • Rudders22
    Rudders22 Posts: 3,864
    Who has rattled that person's cage??

  • The timing is inexplicable. There's something afoot. TR is either very confident or absolutely desperate. Time will surely tell, and soon.
  • Rudders22
    Rudders22 Posts: 3,864
    stonemuse said:

    ‘... significant blow to the reputation of the club and owner and to the ability of the owner to sell the club‘

    They still can’t admit it’s because the price is too high.

    That's what got me...


  • Weird that they mention water and breakfasts being removed but only refute the water aspect.

    So what about the breakfasts? Have you stopped those or not?


    This is clearly getting to Duchatelet and it's clearly true as they haven't denied that the bonuses haven't been paid, only whinged about it being released to the media.

    Stop nit picking Henry, they just forgot to add the line saying the players have refillable Breakfast Bottles. :wink:
  • Rudders22
    Rudders22 Posts: 3,864
    Just as the club are doing well on the pitch it seems someone feels jealous that players, Bowyer, JJ, Gallen and the fans get recognition, they feel left out and have to have their say !!
  • Who let Sea Parkes loose on the club's website ffs.
  • Have you no shame Tom Rubbershoe???

    To let Duch do this twice. Really?!
  • Sponsored links:



  • LargeAddick
    LargeAddick Posts: 32,561
    ‘... significant blow to the reputation of the club ...'

    ha ha
  • In the meantime the club investigated how this issue became national news in the UK and beyond, a significant blow to the reputation of the club and owner

    Pissing myself laughing over this bit... Yeah because up until this stage everyone thought our owner was Mother Teresa!!
  • Bedsaddick
    Bedsaddick Posts: 24,738
    Duchatelet playing the Trump fake news card. Pathetic
  • stonemuse
    stonemuse Posts: 34,002


    The timing is inexplicable. There's something afoot. TR is either very confident or absolutely desperate. Time will surely tell, and soon.

    The timing is crazy ... going so well on the pitch yet they want to stir things up again.

    Definitely RD displaying his annoyance and frustration once again with CARD ... good to see it’s still getting to him.
  • cafcdave123
    cafcdave123 Posts: 11,491
    Sounds like a tired five year old who has been told he can’t have sweets as it’s bed time
  • Shame if it wasn't for CARD the club would have been sold ages ago , nothing to do with the ridiculous asking price then !
  • It has nothing to do with Rubashow - it's the ranting of a lunatic based in Belgium.

    The statement is full of holes of which the most egregious lie is the claim that the staff letter is CARD's communication. It's not.

    I'd say the style and content suggests it's been edited by someone more proficient in English than the last statement.

    Still bollocks, mind.
  • Rudders22 said:

    Call me naive but if that is believable why has it taken up since August 20th to September 25th September to come up with that statement. If that was the truth why did they not publish it back then..


    The timing is inexplicable. There's something afoot. TR is either very confident or absolutely desperate. Time will surely tell, and soon.

    There is a meeting with the EFL.

    That is who this statement is aimed at but it only raises the issues again in everyone's minds and shows that Duchatelet is rattled.
  • MrOneLung
    MrOneLung Posts: 26,853
    So was it a discretionary bonus or not ?