Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)
Comments
-
Charlton really is the club that keeps on giving and giving, you couldn't make this up0
-
mattinfinland said:Honestly, if you are on the teams, just leave . we can get updates on here via RICHARD and Airman, we don't need 125 fans there watching it
That occasion was good to experience what goes on in court0 -
jacob_CAFC said:It's not the fault of the people in the call, how could that be the case...................... it's the lobby being inundated because of how they have set this up. If there was too many fans in the actual call, they would kick people...7
-
Someone's still got their bloody mic on.0
-
I reckon Paul's on £500 per hour and Lauren £300 (plus VAT of course)
0 -
All I can hear is some making dinner1
-
golfaddick said:can anyone tell us what would happen in a normal "live" case. How many people would be allowed into an injunction hearing usually ? If physical presence was allowed.0
-
I hope I'm proven wrong but from a quick Google search it seems they have the better representative. Not looking forward to this.1
-
Can we stop worrying about the experience level of the Barristers.
It does not matter as much as you think. It doesn't alter the facts of the case which is what this is about.16 -
22 minutes of the two hour slot already wasted................... they will do well to get a judgement today at this rate.0
- Sponsored links:
-
Good to have a match thread back. Just waiting for the dreaded no-context 'FFS.'14
-
Paul looks very impatient
0 -
If I got in at 2.10 why couldn’t PE0
-
Surely the court can throw people out Teams if that's an issue1
-
Remember a high end law firm can afford to take on a losing case like this one, smaller ones can’t.1
-
FFS
(First one of the season)5 -
KentishAddick said:I hope I'm proven wrong but from a quick Google search it seems they have the better representative. Not looking forward to this.2
-
They seem to be waiting for the judge now. Elliott was probably not joining on purpose.0
-
Why does PE have to get in? He has no actual role in this process - surely he is just and interested party, like us?
0 - Sponsored links:
-
I dread to think what this delay costs both parties in barrister fees given they charge by the minute 😂1
-
Corner for the Addicks COYR5
-
Dippenhall said:If I got in at 2.10 why couldn’t PE
Is that Southall's opening statement?0 -
i have been booted out more times than Johnny Williams - gonna have to rely on everyone else - keep the commentary coming0
-
Judge can't get in either1
-
OFFS the judge can't join now!!
3 -
There's 1,100 people on Charlton Life right now. Can't we just have the hearing here instead?25
-
They're starting a new meeting with the relevant people, then letting the public join3
This discussion has been closed.